MT433 Unit 8 Nearshoring Proposal Example

Reviewed by Chester Goodwin, MBA Global Supply Chain Management Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Moving a composite importer's hotel towel line, about 30 percent of standard volume, from Faisalabad to a mill in Puebla is proposed to the owner in this MT433 Unit 8 nearshoring proposal. On the same cost rows, Puebla lands a towel at $5.28 against $4.91, a premium near $33,905 a year on 92,400 towels. Monthly partial truckloads, zero duty if the towels qualify under the trade agreement and two weeks of carrying replace 52 days of transit. Three avoided air expedites at $11,000 and $19,000 of hotel fill-rate credits recover about $52,000, netting about $18,095, with about $72,000 of inventory freed as one-time cash. Fisher on responsive supply chains and Ghemawat on distance frame the split. Purdue Global MT 433 assigns this proposal in the BS in Business Administration.

CourseMT433 Global Supply Chain Management
UnitUnit 8
Paper typeNearshoring proposal
LengthAbout 1,160 words, 7 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Business Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MT433 Unit 8

1

Thirty-Seven Cents Dearer, About $18,000 Better: An MT433 Unit 8 Nearshoring Proposal for Hotel Towels

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

MT433: Global Supply Chain Management

Unit 8 Nearshoring Proposal

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

Catawba Linen Supply, the Puebla mill, the hotel contracts and every cost are composite, as of one quote date; duty-free entry depends on the towels qualifying under the trade agreement, and the sources cited are real.

What this part is doingPricing both the premium and the offsets in the lead shows the proposal treats speed as a cost question.
2

Summary for the Owner

The hotel line, 92,400 towels a year, is the part of the business where lateness costs the most. Moving it to Puebla raises the landed cost from $4.91 to $5.28 a towel but cuts the lead time from about 52 days to about a week. That speed removes, on recent experience, three air shipments and $19,000 of hotel penalty credits a year, for a net gain of about $18,095. It also frees about $72,000 of inventory as one-time cash. The gain depends on one condition: the towels must count as originating goods under the trade agreement with Mexico and Canada. If they fail that test, Unit 9 shows the duty would erase the gain several times over.

Landed Cost on the Same Rows

The comparison uses the same cost rows for both sources, since adding carrying cost to one side and forgetting it on the other would flatter the result.

From Faisalabad, as in Unit 2, the towel costs $3.47 at the mill and lands at $4.91 after ocean freight, drayage, duty at 9.1 percent, the 19 percent surcharge recorded on the quote date, entry fees and 73 days of carrying cost at sea and in safety stock.

From Puebla, the mill quotes $4.90 a towel delivered to its dock. Twelve partial truckloads a year of 7,700 towels each cost about $2,600 per truck to Charlotte, 33.8 cents a towel. Duty is zero if the towels qualify under the agreement, and qualifying goods are also exempt from the merchandise processing fee. Carrying cost falls to about a week in transit and a week of safety stock, 4.0 cents a towel. Landed cost is $5.28.

The difference is about 37 cents a towel, or about $33,905 a year on 92,400 towels.

What Speed Is Worth

The hotel contracts require Catawba to keep each property's par stock filled within five days of an order. With 52 days of lead time from Pakistan, a demand spike or a late vessel leaves Catawba short, and it has two choices: fly towels in, or pay the contract's fill-rate credit to the hotel.

Over the past year, three air expedites were needed, at about $11,000 each, and $19,000 of fill-rate credits were paid. With a one-week truck lane, an unexpected order can be covered by the next truck, and the analysis assumes both costs fall to near zero. Those two lines total $52,000.

Net of the $33,905 premium, the move is worth about $18,095 a year.

Proximity earns its keep here only because late towels are already costing Catawba $52,000 a year.

What this part is doingTying the case to an existing cost keeps the proposal from praising nearness for its own sake.
3

The One-Time Cash Release

The shorter lane also releases inventory. At 73 days of pipeline and safety stock from Pakistan against 14 from Mexico, the hotel line would carry about $72,000 less inventory at any time. That is reported separately as one-time cash, not as annual savings, since it is freed once and not again each year. Fisher (1997) argued that products with unpredictable demand need a responsive supply chain rather than the lowest-cost one, and hotel replenishment, with demand that spikes with occupancy and renovations, fits that description better than the retail line does.

The Origin Condition

The whole case rests on duty-free entry. Under the agreement's textile rule for towels, the yarn must be formed in the region, a rule often called yarn forward, and only a small share of non-originating yarn, measured by weight, is allowed (Office of the United States Trade Representative, 2020). The Puebla mill weaves and finishes in Mexico, but its standard terry uses pile yarn from several countries. If the pile yarn comes from outside North America, the towels do not qualify, they pay the 9.1 percent duty and, under the 2025 measures, an additional duty on Mexican goods that do not qualify, recorded on the quote date at 25 percent. At that point Mexico would land at well over $6 a towel.

The proposal therefore asks the mill to confirm, before the first order, which of its yarns are spun in Mexico or the United States, and to sign a certification of origin for each blanket period.

Why Not Move Everything

If proximity is worth so much on the hotel line, a natural question is why not move the retail line too. The answer is that the retail line has none of the costs proximity removes. Its orders are planned eight to twelve weeks ahead, there are no fill-rate credits in the retail contracts, and no retail order has needed an air shipment in two years. Moving it would add about 37 cents a towel, about $79,100 a year on 215,600 towels, with nothing to offset it. The proposal therefore splits the business by the cost of being late, not by a target share.

Other Conditions

Two further conditions apply. The Puebla mill has not yet produced towels to the hotel specification, so a trial order should be inspected before the contract is signed. And the truck lane through the Laredo crossing can be delayed by inspections and border congestion; Chopra and Meindl (2019) note that a shorter but more variable lead time can require nearly as much safety stock as a long, steady one, so delivery times should be tracked for the first six months.

What Stays in Pakistan

The retail line, about 70 percent of standard towel volume, stays in Faisalabad. Its demand is steadier and planned weeks ahead, so the long lead time costs little, and Faisalabad's lower landed cost is worth more there than speed. Ghemawat (2001) warned against treating distance as a single cost; here it matters a great deal for one line and very little for the other.

How Success Will Be Measured

The trial and the first year will be judged on four figures: the share of hotel orders filled within the five-day contract window, the number of air expedites, the fill-rate credits paid and the landed cost per towel as actually invoiced. If the first two improve as expected and the landed cost stays within five cents of $5.28, the move has worked. If fill rates do not improve, the premium is buying nothing and the line should return to Pakistan at the next contract year.

Recommendation

Approve a trial order of one truckload from Puebla for the hotel line, conditional on written confirmation of yarn origin and a signed certification of origin. If the trial towels meet specification and origin is confirmed, move the hotel line to Puebla for the next contract year and keep the retail line in Faisalabad.

What this part is doingMaking the approval conditional on origin confirmation turns the proposal's main risk into its first step.
4

References

Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2019). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (7th ed.). Pearson.

Fisher, M. L. (1997). What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Business Review, 75(2), 105-116.

Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137-147.

Office of the United States Trade Representative. (2020). Agreement between the United States of America, the United Mexican States, and Canada: Chapter 6, textile and apparel goods.

MT433 Unit 8 instructions, in plain terms

Unit 8 asks students to propose moving some sourcing closer to the market and to price the trade-off. Instructors expect proximity priced rather than praised: the landed cost of both sources on the same rows, the value of faster delivery in dollars and any one-time inventory release reported separately from annual savings. The conditions the case depends on should be stated, above all whether goods qualify for preferential entry under a trade agreement, which for textiles usually means a yarn-forward rule. Risks specific to the near source, such as border delays or a mill new to the specification, should be named. Many sections expect the proposal to say why some volume stays with the distant source. The audience is usually the owner, so a short summary should come first.

Inside the MT433 Unit 8 example

A one-paragraph summary for the owner opens the sample. The landed cost section sets both sources on identical rows. A section prices what speed is worth from last year's air expedites and fill-rate credits, under a highlighted line that proximity pays here only because lateness already costs money. Freed inventory is reported as one-time cash, with Fisher on responsive supply chains. The origin condition is explained with the agreement's textile rule and what failure would cost. Further conditions cover the mill's first production and border variability, citing Chopra and Meindl. Sections explain why the retail line stays in Pakistan, with Ghemawat on distance, and how success will be measured. The recommendation approves a trial order on conditions.

MT433 Unit 8 rubric: what earns full points

Nearshoring proposals are usually graded first on whether proximity is priced. A paper saying a nearer source is faster and therefore better, with no dollar value on that speed, leaves the central trade-off unargued. Rubrics expect the same cost rows on both sides, since adding carrying cost to one source and forgetting it on the other flatters the result. Origin is where many proposals lose marks: naming the trade agreement without its textile rule, or assuming goods made in a member country qualify automatically, draws comment. Credit goes to separating one-time inventory release from annual savings. Explaining what stays with the distant source shows a portfolio view. An owner's summary and measurable success criteria support the recommendation.

MT433 Unit 8 help: mistakes that cost points

The usual weak nearshoring paper lists the benefits of Mexico, shorter transit, similar time zones and the trade agreement, without a single cost line. Another common error compares a delivered Mexican price with a Pakistani factory price, leaving freight and duty out of one side. Students often add the freed inventory to annual savings, which counts it every year. Many assume duty-free entry because the goods cross from Mexico. Some propose moving all volume without asking where speed is worth paying for. Before submitting, list every cost that disappears with the shorter lane and point to where it appears in last year's records. Any saving you cannot find in a past invoice or credit memo is a hope, and the proposal should label it that way.

Get an MT433 Unit 8 example written to your instructions

Share both quotes, near and far, from the Unit 8 materials, with volumes, transit times and any service penalties the buyer pays, plus the rubric. The first custom proposal is free and lands in 24-48h, with identical cost rows for both sources, a break-even price and origin treated as a condition, not a given. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More MT433 papers and BS in Business Administration samples

MT433 Unit 8 questions, answered

Why move only part of the volume?

Because speed is worth most where a late shipment is most expensive. In the example, hotel replenishment carries fill-rate credits and air expedites, while retail programs are ordered months ahead and gain little from a shorter lane. Moving everything would pay the Mexican premium on towels that do not need speed, which is why Faisalabad keeps the retail line.

Is duty-free entry from Mexico automatic?

No. Goods enter duty-free under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement only if they meet its rules of origin, and textiles face some of the strictest, generally requiring regional yarn, fabric and assembly. A towel woven in Mexico from imported yarn is Mexican for marking purposes yet may not qualify for the preference, so the example makes qualification its first condition.

How should freed inventory appear in the numbers?

As one-time cash released, kept apart from the annual comparison. The carrying cost of that inventory is already counted inside each source's landed cost, so adding the freed value to annual savings would count the same benefit twice. The example reports about seventy-eight thousand dollars released once, beside an annual net figure that stands on its own.

Where can I find a free MT433 Unit 8 sample paper?

The complete MT433 Unit 8 proposal is here, moving a towel importer's hotel line to Puebla and pricing the premium against avoided air freight and credits.

What condition does the MT433 Unit 8 sample proposal depend on?

The towels must qualify for duty-free entry under the agreement's yarn-forward rule; if the pile yarn is not North American, duty erases the gain.