Every contract, and every missing one, on a composite medical office project is drawn before a single clause is read in the Unit 2 diagram for MT383. Searches like "mt 383 unit 2 assignment example", "mt383 unit 2 sample" and "mt383 unit 2 example" land here.
What a finished MT383 Unit 2 contract chain diagram looks like
One page of diagram and three pages of notes keyed to it. At the top sit the owner, Sorrel Creek Medical Properties LLC, its construction lender and its architect, each joined to the owner by a solid line. Below the owner, the general contractor holds a $14.6 million contract on AIA A101-2017 with the A201-2017 general conditions. Six first-tier subcontractors hang from the contractor, including Northgate Glass, the curtain wall and glazing firm, at $1.38 million, and beneath Northgate an aluminum extrusion supplier and a glass fabricator form the second tier. A float glass maker selling to the fabricator sits alone at the third tier. The surety's A312 payment bond appears as a box beside the contractor, with dashed lines running from it to every claimant it protects.
How a MT383 Unit 2 example is structured
Tiers organize the page, and the legend does the analytical work: solid for a signed contract, dashed for a right that exists without one, and a hollow marker for a party with no route to anyone above its immediate buyer. Notes follow the diagram line by line. Each contract line cites its form and the clause that blocks third-party claims, such as A201's statement that the contract documents create no contractual relationship between the architect and the contractor. Each dashed line names its source, a lien statute [bracketed for Harwick], the payment bond or a flow-down clause. The float glass maker's hollow marker gets the longest note: as a supplier to a supplier it likely falls outside both the lien statute and the bond [depending on Harwick's tier limits]. Lines that later units will test are listed last.
Solid, dashed, hollow
The legend defines three marks and uses no others. At one look the page shows the owner holding contracts with only three parties, and most of the people who built the Pavilion reaching the owner, if at all, through dashed lines.
Architect and builder, unsigned
No line joins the architect to the general contractor. The note quotes the A201 language disclaiming any contractual relationship between them and explains why a contractor's complaint about drawings still runs through the owner.
Two tiers under the glazing firm
Northgate buys aluminum extrusions from one supplier and insulated glass units from a fabricator. Both are second-tier parties, and the note records which lien and bond rights each likely holds [under Harwick's tier rules].
The bond's dashed lines
The lender required an A312 payment bond. It runs from the contractor and surety to the owner, yet claimants who never signed it are its intended beneficiaries, and the diagram shows each one with a dashed line to the surety.
Alone at the third tier
The float glass maker sold to the fabricator and to nobody else on the project. The note concludes it probably has no lien or bond claim [if Harwick follows the common tier limits] and must collect from its buyer.
Where marks go in MT383 Unit 2
Diagrams that show only the owner, the contractor and a row of trades earn little in MT383; the unit wants every tier, down to the suppliers of suppliers. Credit follows the legend. A drawing that distinguishes signed contracts from statutory or bond rights lets a reader answer the course's central question, who can claim against whom, while one that joins everyone with identical lines hides the answer. Notes matter as much as the page, and each line should cite its source, whether a form clause, a statute or a bond. Graders commonly flag diagrams that give the architect a contract with the builder, or the owner one with a subcontractor, since the standard forms disclaim both. Parties with no route upward, marked and explained, show the writer understands where remedies end.
Get a MT383 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Share the project facts or contract list the Unit 2 prompt provides, even if the parties appear only in prose. Add the rubric plus any required diagram format. The free first custom diagram, ready in 24-48h, draws every tier, marks rights that exist without a contract and keys each line to its source.
MT383 Unit 2 questions, answered
What software should I use for the contract chain diagram?
Whatever your section accepts; drawing tools, presentation software and even a clean hand sketch scanned at good resolution all appear. Clarity matters more than polish. Use a legend, keep lines from crossing where possible, and make sure every box is labeled with the party's role, since graders read the diagram for relationships rather than design.
Should the diagram include insurers and sureties?
Include a surety whenever a payment or performance bond exists, because the bond creates rights for claimants who are not parties to it. Insurers are optional unless the prompt raises insurance, though additional insured arrangements can matter for later indemnity work. Mark each with the instrument that connects it, such as the bond form or policy, rather than a plain contract line.
How do I show a right that exists without a contract?
Use a distinct line style, such as a dashed line, and define it in the legend. Label each one with its source, a lien statute, a bond or a third-party beneficiary clause, and note any condition, such as a preliminary notice, that must be met to preserve it. That distinction is often the point of the whole assignment.