For MT382 Unit 9, four site work bids leveled against one scope sheet leave bidder B low by 7,608 dollars, a ranking that rock quantities could reverse. Searches like "mt 382 unit 9 assignment example", "mt382 unit 9 sample" and "mt382 unit 9 example" land here.
What a finished MT382 Unit 9 subcontractor bid leveling looks like
At the center of five pages sits a leveling sheet: bidders across the top, scope items down the side, and each cell marked included, excluded or qualified. Base bids read 1,184,000, 1,097,500, 1,142,800 and 1,226,400 dollars. Plugs fill every gap at the estimator's own price: dewatering at 46,500, site lighting bases at 18,900 and a payment and performance bond at 1.1 percent for bidder B; storm pipe added by the second addendum, which bidder C did not acknowledge, at 27,400, and detention chamber installation at 38,600. Unit prices for rock and unsuitable soil are extended at the geotechnical report's 350 and 1,200 cubic yards. A summary gives leveled totals, 1,246,492 for B and 1,254,100 for A, and a sensitivity table tries rock at none and at double.
How a MT382 Unit 9 example is structured
The scope sheet is built from the drawings and specification before any bid is opened, so the comparison measures bidders against the job rather than against each other. Each exclusion is priced once, at the estimator's number, and applied to every bidder who excluded it, which keeps plugs consistent. The unacknowledged addendum is treated as a scope gap and flagged for a call, since a subcontractor may simply have missed it. Lump-sum and unit-price portions are kept apart because they carry different risks: the lump sum is fixed, while the unit prices pay for whatever rock and soft soil the excavation actually finds. That distinction drives the closing section. At the report's quantities B leads by 7,608 dollars; with no rock, A and B separate by 92; at 700 cubic yards, B leads by 15,308. The recommendation names B, subject to a scope review confirming dewatering and bond.
The scope sheet comes first
Erosion control, excavation, dewatering, storm and sanitary lines, detention chambers, lighting bases, testing and bond each get a row before any bidder's number is entered.
Three gaps in the low bid
Bidder B excluded dewatering, lighting bases and bond. Priced back in at 46,500, 18,900 and 12,792 dollars, they turn a 45,300-dollar lead into a narrow one.
An addendum nobody acknowledged
Bidder C's bid does not reference the second addendum, which added storm pipe. The sheet plugs 27,400 dollars and flags a call to confirm whether the omission was deliberate.
Unit prices extended
Rock runs from 96 to 142 dollars a cubic yard, unsuitable soil from 22 to 31. At 350 and 1,200 cubic yards, unit-price exposure ranges from 67,950 to 76,100.
A ranking that depends on the ground
With no rock, A and B separate by 92 dollars. At double the report's quantity, B's low rock price widens its lead to 15,308, and the recommendation states that sensitivity.
Where marks go in MT382 Unit 9
Ranking bids by their face totals before confirming that every bidder priced identical work is the error this unit most often sets out to catch. Credit follows a scope sheet drawn from the documents, every exclusion and qualification recorded, and each gap priced consistently across bidders. Plugs set at different values for different bidders, or left blank, distort the ranking. Unit prices ignored because they sit outside the lump sum understate a bidder's real cost wherever quantities are uncertain; extending them at a stated quantity, and testing that quantity, earns credit. Addenda not acknowledged, bonds excluded and alternates left unpriced are classic traps in prompts. Recommending the low leveled bidder without noting how narrow the margin is, or what scope must be confirmed, leaves the decision less informed than it should be.
Get a MT382 Unit 9 example written to your instructions
Leveling works from the bids themselves plus the scope they answer. From the Unit 9 prompt, send the subcontractor bids, the specification sections or scope, any addenda and the rubric. The sheet that comes back, free on a first request and ready in 24-48h, prices every gap the same way for every bidder and tests the ranking.
MT382 Unit 9 questions, answered
What does it mean to level a bid?
To adjust competing bids so they cover identical scope before comparing them. Each exclusion, qualification or missing item is priced, most often at the estimator's own figure, and added to the bids that lack it. The leveled totals then compare like with like, which raw bid prices rarely do.
How should unit prices be compared?
Extend each bidder's unit prices at the same assumed quantity, typically drawn from the geotechnical report or the estimator's takeoff, and add the result to the lump sum. Then test other quantities, because a bidder with low unit prices gains as quantities rise. State the quantity you used and where it came from.
What if a bidder did not acknowledge an addendum?
Treat the addendum's scope as missing from that bid and price it, then flag the bidder for clarification. On subcontract bids to a general contractor it may be an oversight the bidder can confirm. On public prime bids, failing to acknowledge an addendum can make a bid nonresponsive, so check the rules your scenario sets.