Endorsement terms come before the deal in the MT358 Unit 7 plan, which pays three knitting designers and writes FTC disclosure, monitoring and review rules into each contract. Searches like "mt 358 unit 7 assignment example", "mt358 unit 7 sample" and "mt358 unit 7 example" land here.
What a finished MT358 Unit 7 influencer and disclosure plan looks like
Seven pages in three parts: partners, obligations and monitoring. Three independent designers are chosen, and each must knit the sample herself. Compensation is itemized: yarn worth about $150, a $600 fee and a ten percent code. Obligations follow, citing the FTC's Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising, revised in 2023: disclosure that is hard to miss and, on social media, unavoidable; placed at the start of captions and spoken in videos; not left to a platform's paid-partnership label alone. A table then applies the FTC's 2024 rule on consumer reviews and testimonials: no free yarn conditioned on positive reviews, staff reviews disclosed, no suppression of critical reviews, no purchased followers. Monitoring closes the plan, with every post checked within 24 hours.
How a MT358 Unit 7 example is structured
Partners are chosen before obligations are written, because the plan's first protection against a disclosure problem is an endorser whose opinion is genuine. Each obligation then cites its source, the Guides or the 2024 rule, with the date of the text consulted, and states the concrete behavior it requires, so a designer could follow the contract unaided. Material connections are listed exhaustively, since free yarn alone creates one; the commission code is flagged as the one most often forgotten. Disclosure placement is specified per format: caption opening, spoken line in video, text on the pattern page. The reviews table stands apart because it governs the studio's own site as much as the designers. Monitoring and correction follow, with named responsibility and a removal clause. A final note calls the plan a course document, not legal advice, and lists what counsel should review.
Designers who knit the yarn
Each partner must knit her sample from the studio's yarn before posting about it. Two sources support the rule: the community's stated suspicion of endorsers who have not used the yarn, and the Guides' expectation that endorsements reflect honest use.
Every connection listed
Free yarn, the $600 fee and the ten percent code each count as a material connection. The plan lists all three in the contract and requires disclosure of the relationship, not merely of the discount code.
Where the disclosure goes
Captions open with the disclosure rather than burying it after hashtags; videos say it aloud and show it on screen; pattern pages note the yarn support. The plan does not rely on a platform's paid-partnership label by itself.
The 2024 reviews rule, applied
No yarn or discount is conditioned on a positive review, staff and designer reviews on the studio's site are labeled, critical reviews stay published, and nobody buys followers or views. Each rule is tied to a line in the contract or site policy.
Checked within a day
The community manager reviews each partner post within 24 hours. A missing disclosure prompts a same-day correction request; a second lapse ends the partnership. Records of every check are kept for the campaign's length plus a year.
Where marks go in MT358 Unit 7
Influencer plans that pick partners by follower count and mention disclosure in a final sentence fall well short of what MT358 asks in this unit. Better plans cite the governing texts by name and date and translate each into a behavior a partner can follow. Treating free product as a material connection, and disclosing commission codes as relationships, shows a precise reading of the Guides. Reliance on a platform's built-in label alone draws comment. Papers that also address reviews, testimonials and follower counts under the 2024 rule tend to score higher, as do plans with monitoring and consequences. Claiming legal certainty weakens the work; a course plan should say that counsel would review the contract before anyone signed it. Stating what follows a lapse, correction then removal, shows realism.
Get a MT358 Unit 7 example written to your instructions
Share the brand, the partners or type of creator your Unit 7 prompt describes, and how they would be compensated, whether yarn, fees or commission codes, plus the rubric. A first plan comes back free in 24-48h, listing every material connection, placing each disclosure by format and citing the FTC texts by name and date.
MT358 Unit 7 questions, answered
Does free product count as a material connection?
Generally yes. Under the FTC's Endorsement Guides, a connection that might affect how the audience weighs an endorsement should be disclosed, and free product, payment, commissions and family or employment ties all can. Check the current text and the FTC's guidance pages, note the date you consulted them, and list every connection your partners have.
Is a platform's paid-partnership label enough?
Not necessarily. The FTC's guidance has cautioned that built-in platform tools may not be sufficient on their own, depending on how visible they are. A plan usually strengthens the label with a clear disclosure at the start of the caption and, in video, a spoken and on-screen statement. Say which you require and why.
What does the 2024 FTC reviews rule add?
It targets specific practices around reviews and testimonials, including fake or AI-generated reviews, compensation conditioned on a review's sentiment, undisclosed insider reviews, suppression of negative reviews and buying fake followers or views. An influencer plan that also governs reviews should show how each prohibited practice is avoided. Cite the rule and the date you read it.