Keep the cage-free promise, restate its date openly and write it into franchise agreements: that is the position one composite MT313 Unit 2 paper defends against shareholder primacy. Searches like "mt 313 unit 2 assignment example", "mt313 unit 2 sample" and "mt313 unit 2 example" land here.
What a finished MT313 Unit 2 position paper looks like
Roughly six pages divided into five parts, one of them a cost table. The introduction states the position in its second sentence and gives the numbers behind it: [54] percent of eggs cage-free system-wide, [71] percent at company-operated restaurants against [44] percent at franchised ones, and a premium of about [five] cents an egg. The cost table prices completion at roughly [$4.6 million] a year, [$1.1 million] of it at company-operated restaurants and about [$8,700] for each franchised location still buying caged eggs, set against system sales near [$1.7 billion]. A section on reliance lists who acted on the 2016 promise. Friedman's 1970 case against corporate social spending gets the longest section, followed by the reply. Recommendations close the paper with a franchise amendment and a quarterly disclosure.
How a MT313 Unit 2 example is structured
The paper argues from reliance rather than sentiment. Its first move shows that a public commitment, repeated in nine annual reports, changed what other people did: egg suppliers built cage-free barns on the strength of it, advocacy groups ended a campaign, and investors read it among the risk disclosures. Walking away quietly would breach expectations the company itself created. Costs come before the objection, so the objection meets real numbers. Friedman's essay appears in its strongest form, as the claim that executives spending owners' money on social goals are taxing them without consent, and the reply accepts that premise while disputing the application: the money was committed in public, with owners informed, as part of the brand they hold. A second objection, franchisee hardship, is met with a phased schedule. Avian influenza since 2022 explains the delay without excusing the silence.
Position in sentence two
Keep the pledge, restate the date as the end of 2028, and require it in franchise agreements rather than leaving it to encouragement.
What finishing costs
A premium near [five] cents an egg, about [174,720] eggs per restaurant each year, and roughly [$4.6 million] annually to close the remaining gap.
Who relied on the promise
Suppliers that financed new barns, advocates who stopped campaigning, investors reading risk factors, and customers told about it on tray liners.
Friedman answered on his terms
His objection to spending owners' money without consent weakens when owners were told year after year and the promise sits inside the brand they own.
Franchisees and the flu
A three-stage schedule for franchised restaurants, a purchasing credit to share the premium, and avian influenza treated as grounds for delay, never for silence.
Where marks go in MT313 Unit 2
Graders reward a position paper that declares its side early and then earns it. The familiar weak version admires cage-free housing for a page, never prices it, and treats the objection as a formality. Here the objection section runs longest because the argument criterion depends on it, and Friedman drawn as a cartoon of greed costs as much as leaving him out. Figures carry weight too. A commitment called expensive without a per-egg premium, a volume and a share of sales cannot be weighed against anything. Papers also slip by confusing the pledge with its achievement, reporting [54] percent as though the target had been met. A recommendation that the company try harder has no mechanism, whereas the franchise amendment and a quarterly figure give a reader something to audit later.
Get a MT313 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Forward the Unit 2 prompt with the side you were assigned, or leave the side open for the writer to choose, along with the rubric and readings. Within 24-48h the paper returns with its position stated early, a cost table, the opposing view argued honestly and then answered, and a recommendation somebody could audit. No cost attaches to a first custom sample.
MT313 Unit 2 questions, answered
Does a position paper have to take the popular side?
No. Several MT313 prompts assign a side, and a paper defending shareholder primacy can score as well as one defending a pledge, provided it answers the best version of the other view. The example keeps the promise because reliance gave it a concrete argument; your assigned side gets the same treatment, with its own costs admitted openly.
Where do the cost figures come from?
In the example they are composite, marked in brackets, built from a plausible premium per egg and one restaurant's daily use. For a real company, sources include USDA egg market reports, the company's filings and trade coverage of supply contracts. Whatever the source, the paper shows its arithmetic so anyone can alter a single input and trace what happens to the total.
Is it fair to judge a 2016 pledge by today's costs?
The paper argues it is fair to judge the silence rather than the delay. Costs changed after avian influenza reduced flocks, and a company can restate a date for that reason. What reliance rules out is letting a public promise lapse without saying so. Your paper may weigh that distinction differently, as long as the reasoning shows why disclosure matters more than the date.