| Course | MT296 Supply Chain Management Applications |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 3 |
| Paper type | Inventory model application |
| Length | About 860 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MT296 Unit 3
Three Hundred Five Bags or a Full Truck: A Unit 3 Inventory Model Application for Potato Flakes
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
MT296: Supply Chain Management Applications
Unit 3 Inventory Model Application
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The pierogi maker, its supplier, prices and costs are composite and illustrative; the sources cited are real.
Assumptions
The plant uses dehydrated potato flakes in its pierogi filling at a steady rate year round, because filling is made daily and stored frozen in batches; the seasonal swing in finished pierogi is absorbed in the plant's production schedule, not in flake purchases. That makes flakes a good fit for the economic order quantity model, which assumes demand for the item is constant and known, that each order arrives all at once, that ordering cost per order and holding cost per unit are constant and that there are no stockouts.
The inputs come from the purchasing and accounting records.
Annual use: 6,720 bags of 50 pounds
Price: $71 a bag
Ordering cost: $118 per order, covering the buyer's time to place the order, receiving and the moisture test the plant runs on each lot
Carrying rate: 24 percent a year of the item's value, covering capital, dry storage space, insurance and spoilage, which gives $17.04 per bag per year
Calculation 1: The Economic Order Quantity
Plugging the plant's figures into the formula gives the square root of (2 × 6,720 × $118) ÷ $17.04, about 305 bags.
At 305 bags, the plant would order about 22 times a year, roughly every 16.6 days. Annual ordering cost is about $2,600 and annual holding cost about $2,599, for a total of $5,198. At the optimum the two are equal, which is a check on the arithmetic. Jacobs and Chase (2020) point out that the total cost curve is shallow around its lowest point, so an order a little larger or smaller than the formula's answer barely changes the bill.
Calculation 2: Rounding to Pallets
The supplier ships on pallets of 40 bags, so 305 bags is not a practical order. Eight pallets, 320 bags, is the nearest full-pallet quantity. At 320 bags, ordering cost falls to about $2,478 and holding cost rises to about $2,726, for $5,204, only $6 a year more than the exact formula.
Calculation 3: The Truckload Discount
The supplier offers a 2 percent discount, $69.58 a bag, for full-truckload orders of 800 bags. The formula alone cannot weigh this, because it assumes a constant price. Silver et al. (2017) describe the standard approach for an all-units discount: compute the total annual cost, purchase price included, at each price break and choose the lowest. The comparison has to include purchase cost.
Eight-pallet orders: purchase $477,120; ordering and holding $5,204; total $482,324
Truckload orders: purchase $467,578; ordering $991 for about 8.4 orders a year; holding $6,680, since the average inventory doubles to 400 bags at a slightly lower value per bag; total $475,248
The truckload raises ordering and holding cost from about $5,200 to about $7,671, but cuts purchase cost by $9,542. The net saving is about $7,076 a year against eight-pallet orders, or $7,070 against the exact formula quantity.
The formula finds the cheapest way to hold flakes; the discount makes it cheaper to hold more of them.
How Sensitive Is the Answer?
Two inputs carry the most uncertainty. The carrying rate of 24 percent includes an estimate for spoilage that the plant has never measured closely. If the true rate were 30 percent, the truckload's holding cost would rise by about $1,670 and the eight-pallet option's by about $680, so the saving would fall to about $6,100, still clearly positive. The carrying rate would have to exceed roughly 67 percent before the truckload lost its advantage, a rate no reasonable estimate of spoilage and capital cost supports for a dry ingredient. The ordering cost of $118 includes the moisture test; if the lab could test a truckload with one sample rather than two, the truckload's advantage would grow slightly. In both directions the recommendation holds, because the discount is large relative to the change in holding and ordering costs.
Can the Plant Hold 800 Bags?
The truckload only works if the plant can store it. At 800 bags delivered and used over about 43 days, the dry storage room must hold up to 800 bags at once, 20 pallets. The room holds 26 pallets, but it also stores flour, so the warehouse lead confirmed that 20 pallets of flakes fit if flour deliveries move to weekly. Flakes keep well for many months in dry storage, so 43 days of supply raises no quality concern. Chopra (2019) notes that quantity discount decisions often depend on storage and shelf life as much as on price.
Recommendation
The plant should buy potato flakes by the full truckload of 800 bags, saving about $7,000 a year, and move flour deliveries to weekly to make room. Purchasing should confirm the supplier's discount in writing for at least a year, since the saving depends entirely on it. If storage becomes tight, eight-pallet orders are the fallback, costing almost exactly what the formula predicts.
References
Chopra, S. (2019). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (7th ed.). Pearson.
Jacobs, F. R., & Chase, R. B. (2020). Operations and supply chain management (16th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Silver, E. A., Pyke, D. F., & Thomas, D. J. (2017). Inventory and production management in supply chains (4th ed.). CRC Press.
The Purdue Global MT296 Unit 3 instructions
The third unit asks students to apply an inventory model, usually the economic order quantity, to a real or composite item and judge whether its answer should be used. State the model's assumptions and check that the item fits them, then document each input with its source. Show the calculation, including annual ordering and holding costs at the optimum. Practical constraints, such as pallet or truck sizes, and quantity discounts usually change the answer, so compare total annual cost, purchase price included, at each option. Ask what happens to the answer if the least certain input is wrong, and check physical limits such as storage. Four pages with a comparison table, citing the course text in APA 7, is a common format.
Inside the MT296 Unit 3 example
The application explains why flakes fit the model's assumptions and lists four inputs with their sources. The first calculation gives 305 bags and equal ordering and holding costs, with Jacobs and Chase on the shallow cost curve. The second rounds to eight pallets for $6 more, under a margin note on the flat bottom. The third compares pallet and truckload orders on total cost, citing Silver and colleagues on all-units discounts, and the highlighted line says the discount makes holding more worthwhile. A sensitivity section shows the truckload stays ahead until the carrying rate passes about 67 percent. A storage check with Chopra confirms 20 pallets fit, and the recommendation names a fallback.
MT296 Unit 3 rubric: what earns full points
Inventory applications are marked on correct use of the model, documented inputs, accurate arithmetic and judgment about practical limits. Checking the item against the model's assumptions before calculating shows understanding. Instructors reward inputs with stated sources, especially ordering and carrying costs, which students often guess. Comparing options on total annual cost, including purchase price, is required whenever a discount exists. A sensitivity test on the least certain input, and a check of storage or shelf life, show the writer is thinking about implementation. A clear recommendation with a fallback, a tidy comparison table and correct citations complete the rubric. Showing that ordering and holding costs are equal at the optimum is a quick arithmetic check graders appreciate.
MT296 Unit 3 help: mistakes that cost points
The most common error is stopping at the formula's answer when the supplier ships in fixed units or offers a discount. Another is leaving purchase price out of the comparison, which makes discounts invisible. Some papers use carrying rates with no basis, or apply the model to seasonal items. Others forget to check whether the larger order fits in storage. Recompute ordering and holding at each option rather than scaling. Share the item's usage, prices and costs, and a writer can run the formula, compare the practical options and test the result.
Get an MT296 Unit 3 example written to your instructions
What item does Unit 3 want modeled, and under what ordering setup? Send its demand, order cost and holding figures if given, the assignment text and the grading rubric. The worked sample states its assumption before any formula, tests any quantity discount, and is free as a first custom sample, delivered 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More MT296 papers and BS in Business Administration samples
- MT296 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- MT296 Unit 2: Demand Forecast Exercise
- MT296 Unit 4: Safety Stock Calculation
- MT296 Unit 5: Supplier Scorecard
- MT296 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- MT296 Unit 7: Transportation Mode Comparison
- MT296 Unit 8: Facility Location Analysis
- MT296 Unit 9: Sales and Operations Plan
- MT296 Unit 10: Applied Supply Chain Report
- MT282 Unit 3: Foundation Method Selection
- MT281 Unit 3: Drawing and Specification Review
- MT262 Unit 3: Communication Failure Analysis
- MT260 Unit 3: Role and Structure Paper
MT296 Unit 3 questions, answered
When does the economic order quantity not apply?
When demand is lumpy or seasonal, when the item spoils within the order cycle, when orders are one-time rather than repeated, or when quantity discounts change the price. In those cases the formula can still be a starting point, but the paper should say which assumption fails and what replaces it, such as a total cost comparison.
How is a quantity discount handled?
Compute total annual cost, purchase price included, at the formula's quantity and at each discount break. The basic formula ignores price, so it cannot choose between price levels on its own. Whichever quantity gives the lowest total wins, provided it fits storage and shelf life. A small table showing each candidate keeps the comparison easy to check.
What belongs in ordering cost?
Costs triggered by placing and receiving an order, whatever its size: purchasing time, receiving labor, inspection or lab testing, and any fixed delivery charge. Freight that scales with quantity does not belong. If your case gives no figure, estimate it from the steps involved and say so, since the order quantity moves with the square root of this number.
Where can I find a free MT296 Unit 3 sample paper?
This page holds the complete MT296 Unit 3 inventory model application. It sizes potato flake orders with the economic order quantity, then shows why a discounted truckload of 800 bags costs about $7,000 less a year.
How is the quantity discount handled in the MT296 Unit 3 sample?
Total annual cost, including purchase price, is computed for eight-pallet orders and truckload orders. The truckload's extra holding cost is outweighed by $9,542 of purchase savings.