MT236 Unit 5 Inventory Analysis Example

Reviewed by Chester Goodwin, MBA Introduction to Supply Chain Management Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This MT236 Unit 5 inventory analysis finds that three slow items at Alamo Ridge, a composite Texas sauce bottler, 14 percent of annual volume at cost, hold about 28 percent of its finished stock. Purdue Global MT 236 covers inventory in Unit 5, and the sample ranks nine items by ABC on annual dollar volume, about $478,600 in total, with four A items at 68 percent. Weeks of supply and turns show the A items at eight to eleven weeks and a holiday gift pack at thirty-eight. Minimum batch sizes and a once-a-year gift run explain the excess, and carrying it at 25 percent costs about $7,800 a year. For the five-ounce glass bottle, a reorder point of about 19,300 and an order of about 35,000 match the new supplier's minimum. Silver and colleagues, Zipkin and Chopra and Meindl are cited for the BS in Business Administration.

CourseMT236 Introduction to Supply Chain Management
UnitUnit 5
Paper typeInventory analysis
LengthAbout 890 words, 6 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Business Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MT236 Unit 5

1

A Gift Pack That Sits for 38 Weeks: A Unit 5 Inventory Analysis for a Hot Sauce Maker

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

MT236: Introduction to Supply Chain Management

Unit 5 Inventory Analysis

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

Alamo Ridge Pepper Co., its items, values, stock levels and costs are composite and illustrative; bracketed figures stand where the company's inventory records would supply the numbers; the sources cited are real.

What this part is doingOpening with the mismatch between volume and stock tells the reader the analysis will find inventory in the wrong places.
2

ABC Classification

The nine finished items are ranked by annual volume at cost, the units sold times the cost to make each. Four A items lead: green jalapeno five-ounce at about [$103,680], red habanero five-ounce at [$86,400], chipotle five-ounce at [$72,000] and original red twelve-ounce at [$63,360]. Together they are about 68 percent of the [$478,588] total. Two B items, verde twelve-ounce at [$48,000] and smoked garlic five-ounce at [$38,146], add about 18 percent. Three C items, ghost pepper five-ounce at [$29,800], habanero twelve-ounce at [$24,602] and the holiday gift pack at [$12,600], make up the last 14 percent.

Silver et al. (2017) describe ABC classification as a way to focus management attention, with tight control and frequent review for the few items that make up most of the value and simpler rules for the many that make up little.

Where the Stock Sits

Finished stock on hand tells a different story. The A items hold between eight and eleven weeks of supply each, about [$59,000] together. The B items hold twelve to fourteen weeks, about [$21,300]. The C items hold far more relative to what they sell: the ghost pepper about twenty weeks of supply, the twelve-ounce habanero about twenty-two weeks and the gift pack about thirty-eight weeks. Together the C items hold about [$31,100], about 28 percent of the [$111,500] in finished stock.

Turns tell the same story. The A items turn about five to six and a half times a year, the B items about four, and the C items between one and a half and two and a half times. The gift pack turns about 1.4 times a year.

What this part is doingComparing each class's share of sales with its share of stock shows exactly where inventory is out of proportion.
3

Why the C Items Pile Up

Two causes explain most of the excess. The bottling line runs each flavor in a minimum batch of about [200] cases because changeovers take half a shift, and for slow sellers a single batch can last five months. And the gift pack is assembled once a year in October for the holiday season, then the leftovers sit until the next October. Neither cause is a forecasting error; both come from production decisions made without considering inventory cost.

The Cost of Carrying

Carrying cost includes the money tied up in stock, warehouse space, handling, insurance and the risk that product passes its best-by date. Alamo Ridge's accountant estimates it at about 25 percent of inventory value a year. On the [$31,100] held in C items, that is about [$7,800] a year, for items that bring in only 14 percent of the volume. Hot sauce keeps well, but the label's best-by date is about eighteen months, so slow items held for many months also face write-off risk.

The gift pack spends nearly three quarters of every year waiting for December.

Recommendations for Finished Goods

For the C items, Alamo Ridge should run smaller batches less often by pairing slow flavors with a similar fast one on the same day to reduce changeover time, aim for no more than twelve weeks of supply, and assemble gift packs in two smaller runs in October and November based on early orders. It should also consider whether the twelve-ounce habanero, its slowest item, is worth keeping. For the A items, current stock levels are reasonable, though they should be reviewed monthly against the forecast from Unit 4.

A Reorder Rule for the Five-Ounce Bottle

Empty five-ounce bottles are the company's most important purchased input, used by six of the nine items. The company uses about [290,000] a year, or about [5,580] a week; week-to-week use varies with a standard deviation near [900]. After the Unit 3 decision, bottles come from the Pennsylvania plant with a three-week lead time.

The reorder point is the expected use during the lead time plus safety stock. Expected use over three weeks is about 16,740 bottles. Safety stock for a 95 percent cycle service level uses a z value of 1.65 times the weekly standard deviation times the square root of three weeks, about 2,570 bottles. The reorder point is therefore about 19,300 bottles: when stock on hand plus bottles on order falls to that level, a new order goes out.

The order quantity follows the economic order quantity. With an ordering and receiving cost of about [$150] per order and a carrying cost of 25 percent of the [$0.28] bottle price, or about [$0.07] a bottle a year, the formula gives about 35,000 bottles, which matches the plant's half-truckload minimum. Zipkin (2000) shows that total cost changes little near the economic order quantity, so rounding to the supplier's minimum costs almost nothing. Chopra and Meindl (2019) note that safety stock should be revisited whenever lead time or demand variability changes, and a switch of suppliers is exactly such a change. Alamo Ridge should therefore recheck the reorder point after the first three Pennsylvania deliveries, since the plant's actual lead time may differ from its quote.

What this part is doingShowing that the formula lands on the supplier's minimum makes the order rule easy to adopt without argument.
4

References

Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2019). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (7th ed.). Pearson.

Silver, E. A., Pyke, D. F., & Thomas, D. J. (2017). Inventory and production management in supply chains (4th ed.). CRC Press.

Zipkin, P. H. (2000). Foundations of inventory management. McGraw-Hill.

The Purdue Global MT236 Unit 5 instructions

Unit 5 commonly asks for an inventory analysis of a company's items, often with ABC classification, a look at stock levels and a reorder rule for one item. Rank items by annual volume in dollars, units times unit cost, not by units alone. Then compare each class's share of volume with its share of stock, using weeks of supply or turns, to find where inventory is out of proportion. Explain the causes, which often lie in batch sizes or production schedules rather than forecasting. State a carrying cost rate and what it includes. For the reorder rule, show expected demand during lead time, safety stock at a stated service level and the order quantity, adjusted for supplier minimums or pallet sizes. Recommendations should address the causes found. Expect about five pages with a few tables in your own version, citing inventory texts in APA 7.

How the MT 236 Unit 5 example is put together

The analysis lists the nine items with their annual volume at cost and groups them into A, B and C classes, citing Silver and colleagues on using ABC to focus attention. Stock on hand and turns are then given for each class, and a margin note explains why comparing shares of volume and stock reveals the problem. A section explains the minimum batch and the annual gift pack run as the causes. Carrying cost is defined and applied to the C items, with best-by risk noted, and the highlighted line describes the gift pack's year. Recommendations pair slow flavors on the line, cap supply at twelve weeks and split the gift run. The bottle section computes the reorder point from three-week demand and a 95 percent safety stock, sets the order quantity with the economic order formula, cites Zipkin on the flat cost curve and Chopra and Meindl on revisiting safety stock, with a second note.

Reading the MT236 Unit 5 grading rubric

Inventory analyses are typically scored on correct classification, insight into stock imbalances and an accurate reorder calculation. ABC classes should be based on dollar volume, and the cumulative percentages should add up. Comparing each class's share of stock with its share of volume earns credit because it turns a classification into a finding. Explaining causes, such as batch minimums, shows understanding beyond the formulas. Carrying cost should be defined and applied. The reorder point needs lead-time demand plus safety stock with a stated service level, and the order quantity should be reconciled with supplier minimums. Recommendations should target the causes. Clear tables and labeled figures help. Silver and colleagues, Zipkin and the Chopra and Meindl text belong in the reference list.

Common MT236 Unit 5 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Inventory papers most often go wrong by classifying items by units sold, which ranks a cheap item above an expensive one. Another frequent problem is computing ABC and stopping there, without comparing stock levels. Some writers state a carrying cost with no explanation of what it covers. Others compute safety stock without saying what service level it gives. The economic order quantity is sometimes reported without checking whether the supplier will sell that amount. Recommendations often ask for better forecasting when the excess comes from production rules. Watch arithmetic in weeks of supply, which graders check against annual volume. Send us your item list with annual volumes and stock on hand, and our writers can help classify the items and set a reorder rule.

Get an MT236 Unit 5 example written to your instructions

Send the stock counts and volumes the Unit 5 case gives, or describe the items of a business you know, together with the rubric. ABC classes, turns, carrying cost and a reorder rule come back in a first custom sample, free and ready within 24-48h. Every formula appears with its units so the arithmetic can be checked line by line. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More MT236 papers and BS in Business Administration samples

MT236 Unit 5 questions, answered

Should ABC classes use units or dollars?

Dollars, in almost every course: annual units multiplied by unit cost. Classifying by units alone tends to put cheap, fast items in class A and expensive, slower ones in C, which reverses where control effort should go. If your data lacks costs, say so and use the best available proxy, such as selling price, labeled clearly as a proxy.

What does an inventory carrying cost include?

The cost of the money tied up in stock, storage space, insurance, and the risk that goods spoil, age or become obsolete. Rates between 20 and 30 percent of inventory value a year are common in textbooks, but a stronger paper builds its rate from components. Food products carry an aging component that, for instance, hardware would not.

Is the economic order quantity still used in practice?

As a starting point, yes. Real orders are then adjusted for pallet sizes, supplier minimums, price breaks and storage space, which is what the example does with its bottles. The formula's value lies in showing how ordering and holding costs trade against each other, and the total cost curve is flat near the optimum, so rounding to a practical quantity costs very little.

Where can I find a free MT236 Unit 5 sample paper?

A complete MT236 Unit 5 inventory analysis appears on this page. It classifies nine hot sauce items by ABC, compares volume with stock, prices carrying cost, sets a reorder rule for glass bottles and includes margin notes.

Why do the C items hold so much stock?

The bottling line runs each flavor in batches of about 200 cases, which last months for slow sellers, and the gift pack is made once a year in October, so leftovers wait nearly a year for the next season.