MT209 Unit 8 Growth Analysis Example

Reviewed by Chester Goodwin, MBA Small Business Management Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

The MT209 Unit 8 growth analysis on this page tests a three-year district apparel contract for fourteen schools, worth about $180,000 a year, against the adopted Boise print shop's capacity. Purdue Global MT 209 asks in Unit 8 whether a growth opportunity builds the business or breaks it, and the sample finds that about 70 percent of the work would arrive in August and September. Three tests follow. The press would need a second shift and two seasonal operators, the rerun cash projection would push the September draw about $50,000 to $60,000 past the line, and the owner has no fall hours left. Four alternatives are weighed, and the recommendation is to bid on the spring lot only, with three conditions for a future fall bid. Churchill and Mullins, Penrose and Churchill and Lewis are cited. It belongs to the BS in Business Administration.

CourseMT209 Small Business Management
UnitUnit 8
Paper typeGrowth analysis
LengthAbout 1,120 words, 7 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Business Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MT209 Unit 8

1

Fourteen Schools in Six Weeks: A Unit 8 Growth Analysis of a District Apparel Contract

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

MT209: Small Business Management

Unit 8 Growth Analysis

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

Northfork Print and Stitch, the school district, the contract and every figure are composite and illustrative; bracketed figures stand where the bid documents and the shop's records would supply the numbers; the sources cited are real.

What this part is doingNaming the size of the opportunity against the size of the shop in the lead makes the scale of the question clear.
2

The Opportunity

The district's request for bids covers three years of team and spirit apparel for its fourteen middle and high schools. The district estimates annual purchases of about [$180,000], or roughly 28 percent of Northfork's current sales. Bids are accepted by lot: a fall lot covering football, cross-country, volleyball, soccer and homecoming, about [70] percent of the volume, and a spring lot covering track, baseball, softball and graduation, about [30] percent. The district pays by purchase order on its standard terms, which the shop's experience puts at about fifty-two days.

Winning the contract would also make Northfork the default supplier for coaches and booster clubs at schools it does not currently serve, a benefit the owner values as much as the contract itself. The district's bid documents also require a performance bond of [$10,000] for each lot, proof of general liability coverage of at least [$1 million] and delivery to each school's athletic office rather than pickup at the shop. Delivery alone would add a van route the shop does not currently run, about [two] hours a day during the fall rush.

When the Work Arrives

The district's past orders, published with the bid, show that about [70] percent of the volume arrives in August and September, with most orders due within three weeks of approval. That timing matters more than the total. Spread evenly, [$180,000] a year would be about [$15,000] a month, which the shop could absorb. Concentrated, it adds about [$63,000] of work to each of the two busiest months.

Capacity Test One: The Press

The job log shows the automatic press booked for nearly nine of every ten available hours in September. The fall lot would add roughly [180] press hours across August and September, more than the press has free. Meeting it would require a second shift for about eight weeks, with two seasonal operators at about [$19] an hour, plus the senior operator's time to train them and to mix school colors for both shifts.

The second shift is possible but fragile. Seasonal operators would need about two weeks of training before they could run the automatic press without close supervision, which means hiring them in July, before the work arrives. The Unit 3 interview found that only the senior operator can mix custom school colors, and a second shift would either run without him or require him to work both.

Capacity Test Two: The Cash

The Unit 5 projection showed the shop drawing about [$40,000] of its [$50,000] credit line at the end of September. Rerunning it with the fall lot added, blanks for the district orders, about [$29,000] across August and September, would be paid before the district paid for the finished shirts, and seasonal payroll for the second shift would add about [$12,000]. The September draw would reach about [$100,000], roughly [$50,000] past the line, and about [$60,000] past it in the worst week.

Churchill and Mullins (2001) showed that a company's ability to fund its own growth depends on how long cash is tied up in each sales cycle, and that firms with long cycles can be pushed into a cash crisis by growth alone. Northfork's cash is tied up for about eighty days on school work, from buying blanks to receiving payment, which is why a profitable contract would empty its account.

What this part is doingRerunning the earlier cash projection with the new work turns a general warning about growth into a specific figure for this shop.
3

Capacity Test Three: The Owner

The operations review found the owner working over sixty hours a week in the fall, with about eighteen of them on quotes and approvals. The district contract would add fourteen schools' worth of art approvals, size changes and delivery coordination in the same weeks. Even with the order coordinator planned in Unit 6, the owner would also have to recruit and supervise a second shift. Penrose (1959) argued that a firm's growth is limited by the managerial capacity available to plan and carry it out, since experienced managers cannot be hired and made effective overnight. In Northfork's case, the managerial capacity is one person.

The contract is worth $180,000 a year, and almost all of it would arrive in the six weeks the shop has no press time, no cash and no owner hours to spare.

Alternatives

Four options are realistic. The first is to bid on both lots and take the full contract. It brings the most revenue but fails all three capacity tests in its first fall. A failed first season would also be public: fourteen athletic directors would see late shirts at the same games, and the district could end the contract for poor performance.

The second is to bid on the fall lot only with a partner shop, subcontracting about half the printing to a larger shop across town. That solves the press problem but not the cash problem, since Northfork would still buy blanks and wait for payment, and it shares the margin.

The third is to bid on the spring lot only. The spring lot, about [$54,000] a year, arrives in March through May, when the press runs at about half capacity and the shop's cash is at its strongest. It would use idle capacity, cost no new shift and test the shop's ability to serve a district contract. It would also place Northfork in front of all fourteen schools' coaches.

The fourth is to decline both lots this cycle and prepare to bid in three years, after the order coordinator, the cash changes and a documented color process are in place.

Recommendation

Northfork should bid on the spring lot only. It adds about [$54,000] in annual sales at the shop's existing margin, uses capacity that sits idle in spring, adds no fall cash strain and builds the relationships that make a future fall bid credible. Before the next three-year cycle, the shop should complete three conditions that would make a fall bid feasible: an order coordinator trained and handling quotes, a documented color mixing process that a second operator can follow, and a larger credit line or deposit terms that cover a fall draw of about [$100,000].

Churchill and Lewis (1983) described the decision to grow beyond the owner's direct control as a turning point in small firm development, one that requires delegation and systems before the growth arrives. The spring lot lets Northfork build those systems on smaller, slower work.

What this part is doingRecommending a partial bid with conditions for the full one shows the analysis can say not yet without saying no.
4

References

Churchill, N. C., & Lewis, V. L. (1983). The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 30-50.

Churchill, N. C., & Mullins, J. W. (2001). How fast can your company afford to grow? Harvard Business Review, 79(5), 135-143.

Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley.

The Purdue Global MT209 Unit 8 instructions

Unit 8 usually asks you to analyze a specific growth opportunity for the business you adopted. Most prompts want the opportunity described, its demands on the business measured, alternatives compared and a recommendation made. A capacity test is central, covering equipment, people, cash and the owner's time, since small firms usually fail on one of these before demand runs out. Rerun the earlier cash projection with the new volume rather than estimating, because seasonal growth often fails on cash first. Alternatives should include partial or delayed versions of the opportunity, not only yes or no. Bid requirements such as bonds, insurance and delivery terms belong in the analysis. A recommendation can be a partial yes with conditions, provided the evidence supports it. Expect about five pages, with a demand calendar in your own version, and cite growth research in APA 7.

Inside the MT209 Unit 8 example

The analysis describes the district's bid by lot, the payment terms and the extra requirements of a bond, liability coverage and delivery to each school. A demand calendar shows the fall concentration, and a margin note explains why timing matters more than the total. The press test uses the job log to show the need for a second shift and the training it would require. The cash test reruns the Unit 5 projection with the fall lot, adding blanks and seasonal payroll, and a second note marks the rerun. Churchill and Mullins explain the cash cycle, and Penrose explains why managerial capacity limits growth. The highlighted line names the six weeks with no press time, cash or owner hours. Four alternatives are weighed, from the full contract to declining, and the recommendation bids on the spring lot, with Churchill and Lewis on building systems before growth arrives.

Where the points sit in the MT209 Unit 8 rubric

Growth analyses are generally graded on the rigor of the capacity tests and the judgment of the recommendation. Describing the opportunity with its timing, not just its size, shows the writer understands seasonal businesses. Testing press, cash and owner capacity separately earns credit, especially when each test uses figures from earlier units. Rerunning the cash projection rather than estimating demonstrates method. Including bid requirements such as bonds and delivery shows attention to real costs. Alternatives should be realistic and fairly compared, and graders reward partial options that fit the evidence. A recommendation with conditions for a fuller version later shows strategic thinking. Research on growth, such as the cash cycle and managerial limits, should explain the findings rather than sit beside them. The two Churchill articles and Penrose need complete APA 7 entries.

Common MT209 Unit 8 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Growth analyses often go wrong by treating any large opportunity as good news and calculating only added revenue. Another frequent issue is testing capacity on an annual basis when the work arrives in a few weeks. Some writers skip the cash test or estimate it loosely, though cash is usually where seasonal growth breaks. Others ignore the owner's time, assuming new work can be managed by the same person who already works sixty hours a week. Alternatives are often limited to accept or decline. Bid requirements are frequently left out. If your business has no specific opportunity, a realistic option such as a second location or a large customer can be analyzed the same way. Send our writers the opportunity and your earlier figures, and they can help run the capacity tests and frame a recommendation with conditions.

Get an MT209 Unit 8 example written to your instructions

Describe the growth option your adopted business faces, or the one your Unit 8 prompt proposes, with any figures and the MT209 instructions and rubric. The analysis tests press, staff, owner and cash separately, reruns earlier numbers where they exist and costs a middle option. First custom sample free, returned within 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More MT209 papers and BS in Business Administration samples

MT209 Unit 8 questions, answered

What if my adopted business has no specific growth opportunity?

Many sections let the analysis examine a plausible option, such as a second location, a new product line or a larger customer, and ask what it would demand. The owner interview often surfaces one. The sample's district contract came from the owner's own account; if nothing comes up, the custom version builds the analysis around the option your instructions suggest.

Why rerun the cash flow projection instead of estimating?

Because growth in a seasonal business usually fails on cash before it fails on capacity. Rerunning the earlier projection with the new volume shows exactly when and by how much the credit line is exceeded, which a rough estimate cannot. It also shows graders that the term's units connect, which many MT209 rubrics reward directly.

Is recommending a partial bid a way of avoiding the question?

Not when it follows from the evidence. The sample shows the full contract exceeds the shop's cash and hours in exactly the months it would arrive, while the spring lot fits both. That is a decision with reasons attached. A recommendation to take everything, or nothing, would need the same analysis, and here the analysis points to the middle.

Where can I find a free MT209 Unit 8 sample paper?

This page holds a full MT209 Unit 8 growth analysis of a district apparel contract for a print shop. It tests press, cash and owner capacity, weighs four alternatives, recommends a spring-only bid and includes margin notes.

What conditions does the sample set for a future fall bid?

A trained order coordinator handling quotes, a documented color mixing process a second operator can follow, and a credit line or deposit terms large enough to cover a fall draw of about $100,000.