| Course | MT207 Starting a Business |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 4 |
| Paper type | Competitor analysis |
| Length | About 880 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MT207 Unit 4
A Chimney Sweep, a Duct Franchise, a Handyman and an Appliance Shop: A Unit 4 Competitor Analysis
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
MT207: Starting a Business
Unit 4 Competitor Analysis
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Clearline Vent Care, its competitors, prices and lead times are composite and illustrative; the sources cited are real.
How the Competitors Were Studied
The founder called each competitor as a prospective customer, once as a homeowner and once as a property manager asking about a 120-unit community, and recorded the quoted price, the earliest available date, what the visit would include and what the customer would receive afterward. Online reviews from the past two years added evidence on weaknesses. Porter (2008) argued that rivalry is only one of several competitive forces, and that substitutes, such as a resident cleaning the lint trap and calling it done, can cap what an industry can charge. Both appear below.
Competitor One: The Chimney Sweep
A long-established chimney sweep company based about twenty minutes from the founder serves most of the apartment communities that clean vents at all. It quoted [$129] per home and [$55] per apartment unit, with the earliest date about [seven] weeks out in October, because fall and winter are chimney season. It cleans the full vent run but does not measure airflow and sends no written report. Its weakness is timing: vents compete with chimneys for the same crews in the same months, and several reviews complain about rescheduled visits.
Competitor Two: The Air Duct Cleaning Franchise
A national air duct cleaning franchise has a location forty minutes away. It quoted [$149] per home, usually as an add-on to whole-house duct cleaning, and declined to quote for apartments, saying multifamily work was handled by a separate commercial division that did not return the call. Lead time was about three weeks. Its strength is brand recognition and advertising. Its weakness for this market is focus: dryer vents are an upsell, not the core service, and the apartment segment appears unserved.
Competitor Three: The Handyman Service
A two-person handyman business quoted [$90] per home and offered to do apartments at [$35] a unit. It cleans the section behind the dryer and the outside hood with a brush kit but does not reach long vent runs through walls or roofs, and it has no camera or airflow meter. It can usually come within a week. Its weakness is depth: on the long runs common in newer apartment buildings, a partial cleaning leaves most of the lint in place.
Competitor Four: The Appliance Repair Shop
A local appliance repair shop cleans the vent behind the dryer for a [$75] add-on when it is already repairing the machine. It does not sell vent cleaning on its own. It matters because it reaches customers at the moment they notice a problem, when the dryer stops drying, and because a homeowner who has paid a repair technician may believe the vent is now clean.
The Substitute
The most common substitute is doing nothing, or cleaning the lint screen and assuming that is enough. For homeowners, that is the main competitor. For property managers, the substitute is waiting for the chimney sweep's next opening.
What the Comparison Means for Entry
Barringer and Ireland (2019) suggest that a new firm look for the gap between what competitors offer and what customers value, and then ask whether competitors can close it quickly. The chimney sweep is the most dangerous rival, because it already has the apartment relationships and the equipment. It is also the least able to respond on timing, since its crews are committed to chimneys every fall and winter. The franchise could add a multifamily program, but its commercial division did not return a call from a 120-unit prospect, which suggests the segment is not a priority. The handyman and the appliance shop lack the equipment for long runs and are unlikely to buy it for a sideline.
Comparison
On price, the handyman is cheapest and the franchise most expensive, with the chimney sweep in between. On lead time, the handyman and the franchise are fastest and the chimney sweep slowest in the months that matter. On thoroughness, the chimney sweep and the franchise clean full runs while the handyman and appliance shop do not. On what the customer receives afterward, none of the four provides an airflow reading or a photo report, which is what property managers say their owners and insurers would like to see.
No competitor shows the customer that the vent is actually clear.
Positioning
Clearline Vent Care would sit between the chimney sweep and the handyman on price, using the Unit 3 rates, with a booking date within ten days all year and a full-run cleaning with an airflow reading before and after and a photo report sent the same day. For apartments, it would offer what nobody currently does: an annual schedule, building by building, with a report the manager can forward to the owner.
Scarborough and Cornwall (2019) advise small firms to compete on a dimension competitors neglect rather than on price alone. Here that dimension is proof. The chimney sweep can match the cleaning but would have to change its season to match the timing, and none of the four currently sells evidence.
References
Barringer, B. R., & Ireland, R. D. (2019). Entrepreneurship: Successfully launching new ventures (6th ed.). Pearson.
Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78-93.
Scarborough, N. M., & Cornwall, J. R. (2019). Essentials of entrepreneurship and small business management (9th ed.). Pearson.
MT207 Unit 4 instructions, in plain terms
In Unit 4 the job is to name and study every rival the venture would face. Most prompts want every business a buyer could use today, including indirect competitors and substitutes, compared on price, service, location, lead time and weaknesses. Evidence should come from published rates, booking pages, reviews and, where your section allows, calls made openly as a researcher or prospective customer. The analysis should explain each competitor's weakness with something specific, not a general claim. Many sections ask how quickly a competitor could copy your advantage, which tests whether a gap will last. A positioning statement closes the paper, stating where your venture will compete and why buyers will choose it. Sections usually expect a few pages plus a side-by-side grid in the version you submit, and cite strategy or entrepreneurship sources in APA 7.
Inside the MT207 Unit 4 example
The analysis explains the method first: two calls to each competitor, one as a homeowner and one as a property manager, plus recent reviews, with Porter on why substitutes cap what an industry can charge. Each competitor gets its own section with price, lead time, what it cleans and its weakness. The chimney sweep's vents compete with chimneys every fall, the franchise never returned the multifamily call, the handyman cannot reach long runs and the appliance shop cleans only behind the dryer, which a margin note flags as an add-on that still shapes buyer beliefs. A substitutes section names doing nothing. A section on entry, citing Barringer and Ireland, asks how fast each rival could close the gap, with a second note on that step. The comparison sets all four side by side, the highlighted line states that nobody shows proof, and the positioning uses the Unit 3 prices.
MT207 Unit 4 rubric: what earns full points
Competitor analyses are usually graded on completeness, evidence and the logic of the positioning. Including indirect competitors and substitutes, not only businesses with the same name, shows the writer understands how buyers actually solve the problem. Each weakness earns credit when it rests on evidence, such as a quoted lead time or a pattern in reviews. A comparison across the same dimensions for every rival makes the analysis fair. Graders often reward a section on how quickly competitors could respond, since an advantage that can be copied next month is not much of a position. The positioning statement should follow from the gaps found and name specific prices and service levels. Methods matter too: openly made calls and public information are appropriate, while misrepresentation is not. The reference list should hold Porter's five forces article and the two entrepreneurship texts in APA 7.
Common MT207 Unit 4 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Competitor analyses often fall short by listing two or three similar businesses and ignoring substitutes. Another common issue is weaknesses stated as opinions, such as poor service, with no evidence. Some writers position their venture as cheaper and better at everything, which rarely survives the financial units. Others never ask whether competitors could copy the advantage. Watch for analyses that describe large national chains in detail while missing the local operator who holds most of the customers. If you find no direct competitors, examine why, since an empty market sometimes means no demand. Calling competitors is fine when you are honest about the reason. Send our writers the venture and the area it serves, and they can help identify every rival and substitute, gather evidence and write a positioning statement that follows from the gaps.
Get an MT207 Unit 4 example written to your instructions
Which rivals exist depends entirely on place, so name the town or county and attach the Unit 4 instructions and rubric. Competitors are identified from public listings there, prices sourced where published, and weaknesses tied to evidence a grader could check. Allow 24-48h; nothing is charged for the first custom sample. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More MT207 papers and BS in Business Administration samples
- MT207 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- MT207 Unit 2: Business Idea Brief
- MT207 Unit 3: Market Research Summary
- MT207 Unit 5: Feasibility Study
- MT207 Unit 6: Legal Structure Memo
- MT207 Unit 7: Startup Cost Worksheet
- MT207 Unit 8: Funding Proposal
- MT207 Unit 9: Seminar Reflection
- MT207 Unit 10: Business Plan
- MT203 Unit 4: Selection Method Comparison
- MT202 Unit 4: Sales Call Plan
- MT140 Unit 4: Organizational Structure Exercise
- MT106 Unit 4: Time Management Plan
MT207 Unit 4 questions, answered
Can I contact competitors directly for prices?
Many students do, openly, as someone researching the field. Published rate sheets, online booking pages and invoices a customer is willing to share are also fair sources. What sections tend to mark down is a price with no stated origin. Posing as a customer to extract a quote raises its own questions, so the sample relies on published or openly shared figures and names each one.
What if there are no local competitors at all?
Then the analysis examines substitutes and asks why nobody serves the market. Buyers may be traveling to a neighboring city, doing the work themselves, or skipping it altogether. Each possibility changes the plan. A market with no rivals sometimes means no demand, and MT207 graders reward a paper that tests that explanation before celebrating the gap.
Where can I find a free MT207 Unit 4 sample paper?
This page contains a complete MT207 Unit 4 competitor analysis for a dryer vent cleaning startup. It compares four rivals and the main substitute on price, lead time and service, tests how fast each could respond and states a positioning, with margin notes.
How many competitors should the analysis include?
Enough to cover every way a buyer could solve the problem today, usually three to five. For this venture that meant a chimney sweep, an air duct franchise, a handyman, an appliance shop and the substitute of doing nothing.
Which competitor does the sample see as the biggest threat?
The chimney sweep, because it already has the apartment relationships and full-run equipment. Its weakness is timing, since its crews are committed to chimneys every fall and winter, the months when managers want vents done.