One composite man's tardive dyskinesia, from recognition to a supported apartment, runs through all six documents of the MN667 Unit 10 portfolio, each addressed to whoever reads it next. Searches like "mn 667 unit 10 assignment example", "mn667 unit 10 sample" and "mn667 unit 10 example" land here.
What a finished MN667 Unit 10 capstone case portfolio looks like
Six documents, about ten pages, joined by a two-page cover memo. The evaluation note records the movements, the AIMS at [14], his antipsychotic history and a diagnosis of tardive dyskinesia. A consultation page explains why neurology was asked about one atypical feature, a neck movement, and what came back. The management plan weighs the two VMAT2 inhibitors approved in 2017, valbenazine and deutetrabenazine, against lowering or changing his antipsychotic, citing the American Psychiatric Association's 2020 schizophrenia guideline, and every regimen stays bracketed. A transition plan covers his move from the group home to a supported apartment. A plain-language communication tells the new support staff what the movements are. The cover memo closes with a practice-level note: [three] years of AIMS entries missing from his chart.
How a MN667 Unit 10 example is structured
The cover memo is the portfolio's spine, because a capstone is judged on whether its pieces make one case rather than six assignments. It states the thread in a paragraph, then maps each document to the decision it records. Every document is written for its own reader and passes the test used across the course: could that reader act without the author? The evaluation is filed as a note, not an essay. The consultation page shows the scope line and why one atypical feature crossed it. Its management plan keeps a record of options considered and rejected, including stopping the antipsychotic outright, set aside because his psychosis relapsed the last time. The staff communication tests the whole portfolio from outside the profession, and the practice note asks why [three] years passed without the scale that would have caught this sooner.
A cover memo as the thread
Two pages link six documents to one story and to the decision each records. A reader starting with the memo knows where to find the consultation, the plan or the move, and why each one exists.
Stopping the antipsychotic, set aside
Discontinuation is weighed openly and rejected, because his last trial off medication ended in an admission. The plan records that history as the reason and keeps dose reduction or a change of agent as questions for later.
Two approvals from 2017
Valbenazine and deutetrabenazine are compared on dosing schedule, interactions and monitoring, with regimens bracketed. The plan chooses on fit with his daily routine rather than on novelty, and names the other agent as a fallback.
Movements explained to support staff
The communication tells the apartment staff what the movements are, that he is not making them on purpose, and what change should prompt a call. Pitched at a plain reading level, it is the portfolio's test of clarity outside the clinic.
Three years without a scale
His chart holds no AIMS between [2021] and [2024]. The practice note traces the gap to a template that dropped the field, and proposes restoring it, turning one patient's delay into a correction for others.
Where marks go in MN667 Unit 10
Coherence across the portfolio is what the capstone rewards: six documents that share a patient but not a thread read as a folder of earlier assignments, and they score that way. Each piece is also judged against its own reader, so an evaluation written as an essay or a staff letter written in jargon costs credit even when the clinical reasoning is sound. The management plan must address the antipsychotic itself, not only the added treatment, because the guideline frames both. Rejecting discontinuation needs its reason from his history. VMAT2 inhibitors should be described accurately, approval year and monitoring included. A transition without owners, a consultation with no stated question and a practice note that blames individuals rather than the system draw comment. Smaller points: the AIMS repeated without a schedule, and any regimen outside brackets.
Get a MN667 Unit 10 example written to your instructions
Capstone prompts in MN667 Unit 10 often build on earlier units, so gather anything you wrote before about this patient, along with the Unit 10 case and rubric. The first custom portfolio is free within 24-48h, joined by a cover memo and written document by document for the next reader.
MN667 Unit 10 questions, answered
How should a capstone portfolio reuse earlier coursework?
Draw on it, then revise it for the portfolio's thread. Earlier assignments were written to show understanding; the capstone expects documents that work in practice and fit together. Update facts that changed, cut explanation aimed at a grader and add the links between pieces. A cover memo mapping each document to its decision makes the connections visible.
Does a portfolio need a practice-level section?
It is often required at the capstone, and where it is optional it usually strengthens the work. Step back from the patient to the system that shaped the case, such as a monitoring gap or a scheduling barrier, and propose one correction. Keep it brief, describe causes rather than blame, and strip out anything tying it to an actual practice or colleague.
Can the portfolio include my own clinical hours or site documents?
No. The sample portfolio uses a composite case and covers written work only: evaluations, plans, communications and analysis. Your practicum hours and logs, real encounter records and every form a preceptor attests to remain yours and your site's. Your own portfolio will draw on your coursework; a sample shows the form and reasoning, not your clinical record.