Screening scores kept alongside the man who produced them: PHQ-9, GAD-7, AUDIT-C and a housing item, with his words and a safety question documented as asked. Searches like "mn 552 unit 8 assignment example", "mn552 unit 8 sample" and "mn552 unit 8 example" land here.
Psychosocial Screening Write-Up: Scores, Context and Strengths for a 34-Year-Old Night-Shift Forklift Operator
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
MN552: Advanced Health Assessment
Unit 8 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Composite patient written as a model document. No real patient, employer or clinician is described.
Context
A composite 34-year-old man attended a new-patient appointment for lower back stiffness. He has worked nights as a forklift operator at a distribution warehouse for six years, on a schedule of four 10-hour shifts from 8 p.m. to 6 a.m. As part of the new-patient visit, I introduced the screening questionnaires as routine for every new adult patient, explained that the answers would stay in his record and asked whether he was willing to complete them. He agreed and completed them on a tablet in the examination room, then talked through his answers with me. Recording how screening was introduced matters, because answers given after a routine, nonjudgmental introduction are read differently from answers given after a pointed question.
How He Responded to Screening
He completed the four instruments in about eight minutes without asking for help. He paused longest on the PHQ-9 and asked whether "trouble sleeping" meant trouble falling asleep or staying asleep; I told him either counted. On the AUDIT-C he asked whether a "drink" meant a can of beer, and I confirmed that it did. When we reviewed the housing item he looked at the floor and said, "I didn't think a doctor's office asked about rent." He then described the reduced hours in detail and asked whether there was any help available. He did not ask to skip any question. When I asked how it felt to answer them, he said, "Fine. Nobody's asked me most of that before." I have recorded his questions and comments as he made them because they show which items needed clarification and which topic he had not expected to discuss, both of which are useful to the next clinician who repeats the screens.
Instruments and Scores
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), standard version, past two weeks: total 11. Published interpretation band: 10 to 14, moderate depressive symptoms (Kroenke et al., 2001).
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), standard version, past two weeks: total 8. Published interpretation band: 5 to 9, mild anxiety symptoms (Spitzer et al., 2006).
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C), three items: total 5. A score of 4 or more is the positive threshold for men in the validation study (Bush et al., 1998).
Accountable Health Communities health-related social needs screening, housing and utilities items: positive on the housing item. He is two months behind on rent. Negative on utilities and food items (Billioux et al., 2017).
PHQ-9 item 9, "Thoughts that you would be better off dead, or of hurting yourself in some way": answered "not at all." Follow-up question asked, in these words: "Have you had any thoughts of harming yourself or ending your life at any time recently, even if they didn't last?" He answered, "No, nothing like that. I've got my kids." Item 9 is recorded on its own line, with the exact wording of the follow-up, so the next clinician can see that it was asked and answered rather than inferring it from a low total.
What the Scores Mean in His Life
The scores describe symptoms; his account describes the life they come from. The PHQ-9 item he scored highest was sleep, at 3, "nearly every day." He sleeps about four hours after a shift, from about 7 a.m. to 11 a.m., then gets up to spend time with his wife before she leaves for work. Because night shift work by itself can raise this item, the total of 11 should be read with that caveat: part of the score may reflect his schedule rather than his mood. His other elevated items were low energy and "little interest or pleasure in doing things," both scored 2. He scored 0 on the items about moving or speaking slowly and about feeling a failure, and he said he still enjoys coaching and watching games with his brother, which suggests the loss of interest is tied to the weekday schedule rather than spread across his life.
He described his home life this way: "I feel like a ghost in my own house. My kids are asleep when I'm up and at school when I'm home." He has two children, ages 7 and 10. He misses their weekday evenings and says the weekends "go too fast." He described worry about rent as the main source of his anxiety: his hours were reduced for two months in the spring and he has not caught up.
He drinks four beers most days after his shift, "to wind down so I can sleep." He does not drink before or during work and has had no alcohol-related incidents at work or while driving. I have recorded the behavior as he described it rather than attaching a label to it.
Strengths
He coaches his nephew's youth soccer team on Saturday mornings and has done so for three seasons. He has not missed a shift in three years and was recently asked to train new operators. He describes his marriage as "solid, we just don't see each other enough." He has a brother nearby whom he talks with most days. These are recorded as findings because they are resources: they show where he has connection, routine and a sense of competence, and they will shape any plan that follows.
Summary
Positive screens: PHQ-9 of 11 (moderate band, with sleep item likely influenced by shift work), GAD-7 of 8 (mild band), AUDIT-C of 5 (positive for men), and housing insecurity (two months behind on rent). PHQ-9 item 9 negative, with follow-up question documented. These are screening results, not diagnoses; each identifies a risk that needs further assessment before any condition is named. His own stated priority, in his words: "If I could just sleep, I'd handle the rest." Strengths: coaching, work reliability, marriage and daily contact with his brother. The back stiffness that brought him in will be assessed separately.
Documentation Notes
Language in this record describes behavior rather than labels. It says that he drinks four beers most days after work, not that he abuses alcohol, and that he is behind on rent, not that he is unstable. Labels such as these carry judgment, travel from record to record and can shape how later clinicians approach a patient before meeting him. Each instrument is named with its version and its interpretation band is cited, because bands differ across instruments and populations and the next clinician should know which one was used. Finally, the record keeps the numbers and the narrative in separate sections and joins them in the summary. Numbers alone would describe a total; the narrative alone could not be compared with a future visit. Together they describe a person whose scores can be tracked over time.
References
Billioux, A., Verlander, K., Anthony, S., & Alley, D. (2017). Standardized screening for health-related social needs in clinical settings: The Accountable Health Communities screening tool. NAM Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.31478/201705b
Bush, K., Kivlahan, D. R., McDonell, M. B., Fihn, S. D., & Bradley, K. A. (1998). The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158(16), 1789-1795. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606-613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092-1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
How this MN552 Unit 8 example is structured
Numbers and narrative sit in separate sections and are then joined, the choice that stops the write-up flattening him. The table gives a reader the scores at a glance; the narrative explains what they measure in his particular life. Item-level detail appears only where it changes meaning. The sleep item scored highest, and the write-up notes that night shift work alone could raise it, so the total is read with that caveat. Strengths are recorded as findings, not as courtesy: he coaches his nephew's weekend team and has not missed a shift in three years. Stigmatizing shorthand is avoided; the record says drinks four beers most days after work, not alcohol abuse. The safety question appears with the exact wording used. No diagnosis is made, and the summary distinguishes positive screens from confirmed conditions.
Get an MN552 Unit 8 example written to your instructions
List the screening tools your MN552 Unit 8 prompt names, together with its rubric and case material, and the first write-up follows your own instructions at no cost. It arrives in 24-48h with each score set beside the person's own words, strengths recorded as findings, and the safety item documented on a line of its own. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
MN552 Unit 8 questions, answered
Which screening tools does the sample use?
PHQ-9 for depressive symptoms, GAD-7 for anxiety, AUDIT-C for alcohol use and one housing item from a social needs screen. Sections vary: some assign the Edinburgh scale for a postpartum case, the CAGE questions, or a full social determinants tool. The sample uses whichever instruments your prompt specifies, with versions and interpretation bands cited.
How should a positive self-harm item be documented?
Exactly as asked and answered, followed by the further questions and the action taken, in the order they happened. The sample's patient answered the item negatively, but it notes what a complete entry contains when the answer is positive. Any real screening, and any safety response, belong to the clinician on site and to your own clinical work.
Is it acceptable to quote the patient directly?
Usually, and it often strengthens the write-up. Short quotations preserve meaning a paraphrase would lose, especially for feelings and priorities. The sample quotes the composite patient twice and paraphrases everything else, keeping quotations brief so they illuminate the scores instead of replacing the clinical record around them.