One named population, one measurable change: HPV vaccine initiation for sixth and seventh graders in one composite district, proposed with evidence and a measurement plan in MN505's final unit. Searches like "mn 505 unit 10 assignment example", "mn505 unit 10 sample" and "mn505 unit 10 example" land here.
Raising HPV Vaccine Initiation From 54 to 66 Percent Among Sixth and Seventh Graders: A Population Intervention Proposal
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
MN505: Epidemiology and Health Promotion
Unit 10 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The school district, practices and figures are composites written as a model document. No real district or registry data are shown.
Population
The population is the 4,300 students enrolled in sixth and seventh grade in a composite suburban school district, identified through the state immunization information system by date of birth and residence in the district's attendance zone. According to the registry, 54 percent have received at least one dose of HPV vaccine and 38 percent have completed the series. The population is narrow on purpose: two grades in one district, identified in one registry, so that the denominator at follow-up is defined exactly as it was at baseline. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends routine HPV vaccination at age 11 or 12, with a two-dose schedule for adolescents who start before their 15th birthday (Meites et al., 2016), which makes these grades the natural target.
Objective
By the end of the second school year, HPV vaccine initiation among sixth and seventh graders in the district will rise from 54 to 66 percent, measured in the state immunization information system. That is about 516 additional students. Completion of the series is a secondary measure. For context, the Healthy People 2030 target is for 80 percent of adolescents to receive the recommended doses (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, n.d.); this proposal's objective is a step toward that target, sized to what three interventions in one district can reasonably achieve.
Interventions Matched to Barriers
Three barriers explain most missed initiation in the district: families forget or postpone appointments, clinicians miss opportunities to vaccinate at visits for other reasons, and some families rarely see a clinician at all. Each intervention addresses one barrier and was chosen from reviewed evidence rather than preference.
Reminder and recall for forgotten appointments. The county health department will use the registry to send text, mail and telephone reminders to families of students with no HPV dose, and recall messages to those overdue for a second dose. Patient reminder and recall systems increase immunization rates across ages and settings (Jacobson Vann et al., 2018).
Standing orders for missed opportunities. The district's two main pediatric practices, which see about 70 percent of students, will adopt standing orders that allow nurses and medical assistants to offer HPV vaccine at any visit, including sick visits and sports physicals, without a separate provider order. Standing orders are recommended by the Community Preventive Services Task Force to increase vaccination (Community Preventive Services Task Force, n.d.).
School-located clinics for families with limited access. The county health department will hold vaccination clinics at each middle school twice a year, in October and March, with written parental consent collected in advance. School-located vaccination programs are also recommended by the task force, particularly when combined with other components such as reminders.
Consent and Equity
All school-located vaccinations require written consent from a parent or guardian, and no student will be vaccinated without it. Consent forms will be available in the district's three most common home languages. Registry data show initiation below 45 percent at two of the district's five middle schools, both with the highest proportions of students eligible for free school meals. School clinics will begin at those two schools, and reminder calls there will be made by bilingual staff, because an intervention delivered evenly to an unequal population can widen the gap it is meant to close.
Implementation
Months 1 to 3: registry reminder system set up; standing order protocols written and approved by both practices' medical directors; school clinic dates set with the district. Month 4: first reminder wave; standing orders begin. Month 5: first school clinics. The same cycle repeats each school year, with reminder waves in August and January.
Evaluation Plan
The county health department's epidemiologist will pull registry data every quarter for the defined population. Primary outcome: proportion of sixth and seventh graders with at least one HPV dose. Secondary outcome: series completion. Process measures, one per intervention so that a shortfall can be traced to its cause: proportion of families reached by at least one reminder; proportion of practice visits by eligible students at which the vaccine was offered, audited from a monthly sample of charts; and number of doses given at school clinics. Success is initiation of 66 percent or higher in the final quarter of the second school year. If initiation rises but falls short, the process measures will show which intervention underperformed.
Risks and How They Will Be Managed
Three risks could keep the proposal from reaching its objective. Registry completeness is the first: doses given out of state or at pharmacies that do not report would make initiation look lower than it is, so the evaluation will compare registry data with a sample of school health records each year. Vaccine hesitancy is the second: some families decline because of safety concerns, and reminders alone will not change that. Clinicians at both practices will receive brief training in presumptive recommendation, introducing HPV vaccine alongside the other adolescent vaccines rather than as an optional extra. Consent return is the third: school clinics depend on forms coming back. Forms will be sent home twice, available online and accepted at the clinic door when a parent attends.
Budget
Reminder and recall: staff time and messaging, about 18,000 dollars over two years. Standing orders: training and chart audits, about 6,000 dollars. School clinics: nursing staff, supplies and consent processing, about 22,000 dollars. Vaccine for eligible students is supplied through the Vaccines for Children program or billed to insurance. Estimated two-year total: about 46,000 dollars.
References
Community Preventive Services Task Force. (n.d.). Vaccination programs [Task force findings]. The Community Guide. https://www.thecommunityguide.org/topics/vaccination.html
Jacobson Vann, J. C., Jacobson, R. M., Coyne-Beasley, T., Asafu-Adjei, J. K., & Szilagyi, P. G. (2018). Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018(1), CD003941. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003941.pub3
Meites, E., Kempe, A., & Markowitz, L. E. (2016). Use of a 2-dose schedule for human papillomavirus vaccination: Updated recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 65(49), 1405-1408. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6549a5
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.). Increase the proportion of adolescents who get recommended doses of the HPV vaccine (IID-08). Healthy People 2030. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/vaccination/increase-proportion-adolescents-who-get-recommended-doses-hpv-vaccine-iid-08
How this MN505 Unit 10 example is structured
A proposal of this kind persuades only if the change it promises can be counted, so the objective comes before the interventions and the measurement plan uses the same source as the baseline. The population section is narrow on purpose: two grades in one district, identified in one registry, with no room for a denominator that shifts between baseline and follow-up. Interventions are chosen from the Community Preventive Services Task Force findings rather than from preference, and each is paired with the barrier it addresses: forgotten appointments, missed opportunities at visits, and access for families who rarely see a clinician. Consent and equity get their own paragraph, noting which schools have the lowest initiation. The evaluation plan names who pulls registry data, how often, and what counts as success, then adds one process measure per intervention so a shortfall can be traced to its cause.
Get an MN505 Unit 10 example written to your instructions
Name the population your Unit 10 proposal targets and the change in view, or leave that choice to be drawn from your earlier units, and include the prompt and your rubric. A free first custom sample is written to those instructions in 24-48h, with the objective, evidence and measurement plan aligned. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
MN505 Unit 10 questions, answered
Why target initiation when the national goal concerns completion?
Because a series cannot be finished until it is started, and initiation is where this district loses the most students. The Healthy People 2030 objective of 80 percent refers to adolescents with all recommended doses, far above the district's 38 percent completion. The example raises initiation first, tracks completion as a secondary measure, and explains why that order is realistic for two school years.
Does the objective have to use registry data?
Not always, but it should use a source that measures the behavior directly and matches the baseline. State immunization information systems record doses given, which makes them stronger than parent surveys. Where registry completeness is a concern, the proposal should say so and describe how missing records are handled, as the example does in a short limitations note.
Can a proposal include more than one intervention?
Yes, as long as they serve one objective and each addresses a stated barrier. The example combines three because different families miss vaccination for different reasons. What weakens a proposal is a list of unrelated activities with no link to the objective, or interventions chosen without evidence. Tracking each separately also shows which one is working.