IT333 · Unit 1

IT333 Unit 1 emerging technology definition post example

Emerging Technologies and the Future Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

A newer model of yard crane and a remote-operated ship-to-shore crane sit on the same composite container port's purchase list, and only one of them counts as an emerging technology. This IT333 Unit 1 definition post uses that pair to test a five-attribute definition from the research literature, and ends by admitting where the line blurs.

What this page holds

Two cranes at one port, one emerging and one simply newer, are sorted by Rotolo, Hicks and Martin's five attributes in this IT333 Unit 1 discussion post. Searches like "it 333 unit 1 assignment example", "it333 unit 1 sample" and "it333 unit 1 example" land here.

What a finished IT333 Unit 1 emerging technology definition post looks like

About 420 words of initial post and a reply of roughly 150 make up the example. The post opens with its thesis in one sentence: newness describes a product, while emergence describes a technology whose effects are still uncertain. It then summarizes the definition proposed by Rotolo, Hicks and Martin in Research Policy in 2015, radical novelty, relatively fast growth, coherence, prominent impact, and uncertainty and ambiguity, and scores both cranes against the five in a compact table. The newer yard crane fails on novelty and uncertainty; remote operation of ship-to-shore cranes, established in parts of Europe and Asia and still contested in North America, arguably meets all five. Its last paragraph argues that emergence is relative to place and time. The reply questions a classmate's example.

How a IT333 Unit 1 example is structured

Testing, not listing, is how the post argues. A definition from a peer-reviewed source comes first, because prompts in many sections ask what separates emerging technologies from new ones, and an unsourced definition reads as opinion. Each attribute becomes a question a manager could answer about a specific machine, and the two cranes answer it. Contrast does the arguing: the newer yard crane is faster and cheaper to run, but its effects on work, cost and safety are well understood, so it counts as improvement rather than emergence. Remote operation changes who works and from where, with a disputed productivity record. A final qualification earns credit: a technology routine at a large European terminal can still be emerging at a smaller North American one. Its reply presses a classmate on which attributes a new phone model satisfies.

Thesis in one sentence

Newness belongs to products and emergence to technologies whose consequences are unsettled, a distinction the post commits to before offering any example.

Five attributes from the literature

Radical novelty, fast growth, coherence, prominent impact, and uncertainty and ambiguity are summarized from Rotolo, Hicks and Martin and cited in APA style.

Two cranes scored

A compact table rates the faster yard crane and remote-operated quay cranes against each attribute, with a one-line reason in every cell.

Emergence depends on where

Remote crane operation is routine at some European and Asian terminals, yet at this port it would still change jobs, costs and safety in ways nobody can yet measure.

Reply on phone releases

A classmate's claim that each phone release is an emerging technology is met with one question per attribute, conceding growth and coherence while disputing novelty.

Where marks go in IT333 Unit 1

Examples offered without a definition, artificial intelligence or quantum computing named as emerging with nothing said about what makes them so, lose the most here. A definition drawn from a dictionary or a vendor blog, rather than scholarship or the course text, draws comments where sources are required. Treating emerging as a synonym for recent or popular is the conceptual slip this unit tends to probe. Posts that praise a technology instead of classifying it read as enthusiasm rather than analysis. Missing uncertainty is a quieter weakness: a technology whose outcomes are already known is, by most definitions, no longer emerging, and graders credit posts that say so. A reply offering agreement alone, with no question, source or counterexample, earns little, and posts outside the requested length lose the formatting line.

Get a IT333 Unit 1 example written to your instructions

Unit 1 prompts in IT333 vary: some supply a list of technologies to classify, others ask for your own example and a source. Send the exact discussion prompt and grading rubric, plus any assigned reading you are expected to cite, and a custom post modeled on them arrives within 24-48h, free as your first sample.

IT333 Unit 1 questions, answered

Is artificial intelligence still an emerging technology?

It depends on which part and where. Some machine learning uses, such as fraud scoring or image recognition, are widely deployed and well understood, while others remain uncertain in cost, reliability and effect. Many IT333 posts argue that AI is a family of technologies at different stages. Stating which application you mean, and dating your evidence, makes the claim defensible.

Do I need a scholarly source for a discussion post?

The rubric decides. Many IT333 discussion rubrics require at least one credible source, and a definition from peer-reviewed work or the course text is safer than a vendor page or an encyclopedia entry. The sample cites Rotolo, Hicks and Martin because their definition is widely used in research on the subject, but your course reading may offer another.

How is emerging different from disruptive?

Emerging describes a stage: novel, growing, uncertain. Disruptive, in Clayton Christensen's sense, describes a competitive effect, where a simpler or cheaper offering starts at the low end of a market and eventually displaces established firms. A technology can be emerging without being disruptive, and a disruptive product can rely on mature technology. Keeping the terms apart sharpens a definition post.