IT301 · Unit 6

IT301 Unit 6 project schedule example

Project Management I Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Launch day for the real-time arrivals rollout falls 142 working days after contract award, and this IT301 Unit 6 project schedule derives that figure from logic. Sixty-four linked activities pass through a forward and a backward calculation, and the critical path runs from hardware delivery through pilot installation, fleet installation and thirty days of prediction tuning.

What this page holds

Linked logic sets the 142-working-day critical path in IT301's Unit 6 schedule for the arrivals project, with both passes shown and float reported for all sixty-four activities. Searches like "it 301 unit 6 assignment example", "it301 unit 6 sample" and "it301 unit 6 example" land here.

What a finished IT301 Unit 6 project schedule looks like

Three artifacts in one document. An activity table lists all 64 activities with ID, WBS code, duration and predecessors, the relationship type marked on each link. Most links are finish-to-start; operator training starts five days after fleet installation starts through a start-to-start link with lag, and one two-day lead lets sign mounting overlap final foundation inspection. Early start, early finish, late start, late finish and total float fill the remaining columns. An activity-on-node network diagram follows, critical activities outlined in bold. The sign permitting chain carries nine days of total float and the training chain twenty-two. A Gantt chart closes the set, milestones drawn as diamonds at zero duration and the approved baseline saved beneath the bars for later comparison. A one-page narrative discusses the near-critical sign chain and the two garage bays available overnight.

How a IT301 Unit 6 example is structured

Logic comes before time. The activity list and its dependencies are presented first, then the two calculations that turn durations into dates: the forward pass for early dates, the backward pass for late ones. The network diagram precedes the Gantt chart because the diagram shows why activities follow one another while the chart shows when they happen. The critical path is identified by zero total float and traced activity by activity in a short paragraph. Two activities are used to distinguish total float from free float, since the difference matters when a delay is absorbed. Milestones mark the charter's six summary dates. Calendar assumptions are stated once: a five-day working calendar with agency holidays excluded, and overnight installation shifts counted as working days. A final paragraph declares the schedule baseline.

Dependencies typed on every link

Finish-to-start by default, one start-to-start with a five-day lag for training, and a single two-day lead, each marked where it occurs.

Forward and backward passes

Early and late dates computed for all sixty-four activities, with the arithmetic shown for the critical chain so the figures can be checked.

Network before Gantt

An activity-on-node diagram showing sequence, then a bar chart showing time, each doing the job the other cannot.

Total float and free float

Two activities used to show the difference: slack that delays the project if spent, and slack that delays nothing downstream.

Near-critical chains named

Sign permitting at nine days of float and training at twenty-two, identified as the paths most likely to become critical.

Baseline declared

The approved dates frozen as the reference that progress will be measured against once the project is executing.

Where marks go in IT301 Unit 6

Schedules in IT301 are graded on whether the logic holds together. Dangling activities, with no successor except the project end or no predecessor except its start, break the calculation and let the critical path skip them. Hard constraint dates applied to force bars into place override the network and hide the real finish. Lags used to stand in for work that deserves its own activity are another frequent comment. Linking summary tasks rather than activities confuses the passes. Critical paths identified by eye, as whichever bar looks longest, lose points when the float column disagrees. Milestones given duration, float values reported without the passes behind them, and resource conflicts ignored when only two garage bays exist overnight are the smaller deductions graders mention regularly.

Get a IT301 Unit 6 example written to your instructions

Schedules rest on the activities and durations estimated before them. Send your IT301 estimates or activity list with the Unit 6 prompt and rubric, naming the software if your section specifies one. Delivery of the linked schedule, network diagram and Gantt chart takes 24-48h. First custom samples are free.

IT301 Unit 6 questions, answered

What is the difference between total float and free float?

Total float is how long an activity can slip without delaying the project finish. Free float is how long it can slip without delaying the early start of any activity that follows it. An activity can have total float but no free float, meaning any slip pushes a successor later even though the finish date survives.

When is a start-to-start relationship appropriate?

When a successor can begin once its predecessor has started, rather than finished. Training operators after the first buses carry equipment is an example: sessions can begin a few days into installation. Adding a lag to the link sets that delay. Your section may ask you to justify any link other than finish-to-start, and the sample does so in a sentence.

Do I need a network diagram if I already have a Gantt chart?

Many IT301 rubrics ask for both, because they show different things. The Gantt chart displays timing, but dependencies can be hard to read on it; the network diagram displays logic and makes the critical path visible. If your instructions accept one, the sample follows that, but it keeps the dependency table either way.