One charity 5K, four linked files: this IT133 Unit 9 integration sample merges runner letters from Access data and links one Excel chart into Word and PowerPoint. Searches like "it 133 unit 9 assignment example", "it133 unit 9 sample" and "it133 unit 9 example" land here.
What a finished IT133 Unit 9 cross-application integration project looks like
A single project folder holds five files named to one pattern. The Access database stores 85 composite registrants with name, address, distance and pledge total, and a query selects runners who raised at least $100. The Excel workbook imports that query's results, totals pledges by distance, and charts them as a bar chart. The Word summary report, two pages, contains that chart pasted as a link, so a change in the workbook appears in the report after an update, along with an embedded Excel table of the top ten fundraisers. A Word letter main document holds merge fields for first name, distance and pledge amount, connected to the Access query, and a merged output document sits beside it with one letter per qualifying runner. The PowerPoint recap slide carries the same linked chart.
How a IT133 Unit 9 example is structured
The project is organized around a single source for each kind of data, and every other file points back to it. Registrant details live only in Access; the letters read them through a mail merge rather than a pasted list, so fixing a misspelled name at the source fixes every letter once the merge runs again. Pledge figures live in Excel, and the chart that appears in Word and PowerPoint is linked, not pasted as a picture, which is the distinction many integration rubrics test directly. The embedded top-ten table is a deliberate contrast: it travels inside the report and no longer follows the workbook, and a note says why that suits a fixed snapshot. A one-page integration map in the folder lists each connection, its type, linked, embedded or merged, and the file at each end.
Access as the registration source
Eighty-five composite runners in one table, and a saved query selecting those who raised at least $100. Both the merge and the Excel import read that query, so the qualifying list is defined once.
Excel pledges and chart
The imported results are totaled by distance with SUMIF and drawn as a bar chart. This chart is the one object that appears in three files, and it is edited only here.
Word report, linked and embedded
Two pages summarizing the event, holding the chart as a linked object that updates from the workbook and a top-ten table embedded as a frozen snapshot, each captioned to say which it is.
Merged letters of thanks
A main document with merge fields for first name, distance and pledge, connected to the Access query, and the merged result: one letter per qualifying runner, each correctly addressed with no field codes showing.
Recap slide and integration map
A PowerPoint slide carrying the same linked chart, and a one-page map listing every connection in the folder by type, source and destination, so each link can be verified without hunting for it.
Where marks go in IT133 Unit 9
Integration projects lose the most when the connection itself is missing. A chart pasted as a picture looks identical to a linked one until the grader changes a figure in the workbook and the report stays the same; that single test settles the integration row in many sections. Mail merges fail in two familiar ways: merged letters with visible field codes or blank names, or a set of letters typed individually with no data source attached. Links broken by moving files between folders, so the report asks for a missing workbook on opening, cost points even when every file is otherwise correct. Submitting only the output documents, without the source files the links depend on, leaves nothing to verify. The highest marks go to projects whose every connection can be traced from source to destination and survives an update.
Get a IT133 Unit 9 example written to your instructions
Send the full Unit 9 project instructions and rubric, which should show which applications your IT133 section wants connected and whether a mail merge is required, plus the data set if one was supplied. The sample folder mirrors those connections file for file, with an integration map, and is delivered within 24-48h. No fee applies to the first custom sample.
IT133 Unit 9 questions, answered
What is the difference between linking and embedding?
A linked object stays connected to its source file, so changes made in the workbook appear in the Word or PowerPoint copy after an update. An embedded object is a full copy stored inside the destination file; it can still be edited, but it no longer follows the source. Integration rubrics often ask for one of each, and graders test the difference directly.
Why do my links break when I submit the files?
Links store the path to the source file, so moving the files into a different folder, or uploading only the Word document, leaves the link pointing at nothing. Keeping every file of the project in one folder before linking, and submitting the whole set together, avoids most of it. Your instructions may also ask for a single compressed folder.
Does a mail merge count as integration?
In most IT133 sections, yes. A merge connects a Word document to a data source in Excel or Access, which is exactly the kind of cross-application link the unit is about. What graders check is that the merge fields are real fields tied to the source, and that the finished letters contain the right data with no field codes or blanks showing.