HW450 Unit 3 Communication Strategies Analysis Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Applied Health Coaching Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Three sessions in which Teresa moved from guarded answers to describing nights she cries in her car before going in to her mother are examined in this HW450 Unit 3 communication strategies analysis. Each strategy is shown with her actual exchanges: an open question that surfaced her second goal, reflections such as "by six o'clock you've already given everything," affirmations of effort, summaries she corrected and information offered only with permission. One strategy failed, a closed question counting her wine, and an open apology repaired it. Miller and Rollnick's motivational interviewing, Wolever and colleagues' definition of coaching and the cultural humility concept from Tervalon and Murray-García frame the analysis. Purdue Global HW 450 asks BS in Health and Wellness students to analyze what builds a coaching relationship. Teresa's own view and two strategies deliberately held back complete the paper.

CourseHW450 Applied Health Coaching
UnitUnit 3
Paper typeCommunication strategies analysis
LengthAbout 1,180 words, 7 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Health and Wellness
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HW450 Unit 3

1

The Question I Should Not Have Asked About the Wine: A Unit 3 Analysis of Communication Strategies in Three Coaching Sessions

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

HW450: Applied Health Coaching

Unit 3 Communication Strategies Analysis

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The client, sessions and quotations are composite; the frameworks and studies cited are real.

What this part is doingNaming a failed question in the title and lead signals an analysis that tests strategies rather than celebrating them.
2

Why Communication Is the Intervention

In coaching, the conversation is not a vehicle for the intervention; it is the intervention. Wolever et al. (2013), reviewing how coaching has been defined across studies, describe a process that is patient-centered, involves goals set by the client, uses self-discovery and active learning and includes accountability, all delivered through a relationship. If the relationship fails, nothing else in the program reaches the client. That makes the analysis of communication a central part of applied coaching rather than a soft skill beside it.

Open Questions

In session one, I asked, "What would you like to be different in three months?" Teresa answered with both her goals, staying off medication and having more patience with her mother. A closed question such as "Do you want to lower your blood pressure?" would have produced a yes and missed the second goal, which turned out to matter more to her.

Open questions invite the client to choose what is important. Miller and Rollnick (2013) treat them as one of the core skills of motivational interviewing because they hand the direction of the conversation to the client.

Reflections

When Teresa said evenings were the hardest, I reflected, "By six o'clock you've already given everything you have." She paused and said, "Yes. That's exactly it." The reflection did not add information, but it showed I had understood, and she went on to describe the evening routine in detail: her mother's dinner, medications, bath and the hours of repeated questions.

Complex reflections, which add a guess about meaning, were the most powerful. When she mentioned the wine in session two, I reflected, "The glass of wine is the first moment of the day that's yours." She agreed and added that she knew it was not good for her blood pressure.

Affirmations

Teresa is hard on herself. When she reported a complete week of morning and evening home readings, I said, "You did that on top of everything else this week." Affirmations recognize effort and strengths rather than praising outcomes, and they seemed to lower her guard. She began bringing her log without being asked.

Summaries

At the end of each session, I summarized her own words and decisions and asked if I had them right. In session two she corrected my summary: I had said she would "cut back on takeout," and she said she had only agreed to try one home-cooked meal a week. The correction mattered. It showed that summaries let the client keep ownership of her decisions.

Teresa corrected my summary, and that correction was the best evidence that the goals in the plan were hers.

What this part is doingTreating the client's correction as a sign of success shows the writer understands the purpose of a summary.
3

Asking Permission

Before sharing information about sodium in frozen meals, I asked, "Would it help if I shared what some people find when they check the labels?" She said yes. Information offered with permission was received as help rather than criticism.

The Strategy That Failed

In session two, before the reflection about the wine, I asked a closed question: "How many glasses do you have on a typical night?" Teresa's tone changed. She said, "Not that many," and moved to another topic. A count felt like an audit, especially because she had worried at intake that her employer might see her information.

I repaired it later in the session. I said, "Earlier I asked you to count the wine, and I think that felt like being checked up on. I'm sorry. I'm more interested in what the evening is like for you." That apology and the reflection that followed reopened the subject. By session three she volunteered that she drank one or two glasses most nights and wanted to cut back to weekends.

The lesson is that a closed question about a sensitive behavior can be heard as judgment, and that naming the rupture openly can repair it.

Cultural Humility

Teresa's family is Mexican American, and caring for her mother at home rather than in a facility is, in her words, "what we do." Early in session one I nearly suggested looking into memory care. I did not, and instead asked what caring for her mother meant to her. The idea of cultural humility began in medical education as an alternative to treating culture as a list of facts to master; it asks the helper to keep examining their own assumptions and to let each client teach them what matters (Tervalon & Murray-García, 1998). Asking rather than assuming meant that later, when we discussed respite, she raised the idea of an adult day program herself, framed as a way to keep caring for her mother at home longer.

What this part is doingShowing how humility shaped a later decision demonstrates the strategy's effect rather than only its definition.
4

How Teresa Described the Sessions

At the end of session three I asked Teresa what had made the conversations useful so far. She said she had expected to be told to eat salad and walk more, and instead she had been asked what her evenings were like. She said the moment that mattered most was the apology about the wine question, because it showed her that I would notice when something felt wrong. That answer confirmed what the analysis suggests: what worked was whatever showed her she was being listened to, and the repair mattered as much as any technique.

Strategies Considered and Not Used

Two strategies were deliberately held back. I did not use confrontation or warnings about her father's stroke, though she had mentioned it, because fear-based messages tend to produce defensiveness when a client already feels judged. I also did not use detailed goal contracts in the first sessions, because she was still deciding what she wanted to change, and a contract would have committed her before she was ready. Both may have a place later, but not before the relationship could carry them.

What the Analysis Shows

Across three sessions, the strategies that built the relationship were those that handed control to Teresa: open questions, reflections that showed understanding, affirmations of effort, summaries she could correct and information offered with permission. The one that damaged it took control away. Cultural humility kept me from imposing a solution that would have conflicted with her values.

What I Will Do Differently

I will avoid counting questions about sensitive behaviors until trust is established, and when I need numbers, I will ask the client to track them herself and share what she chooses. I will also notice my own impulse to suggest solutions that reflect my assumptions about family and care.

Conclusion

Teresa's openness grew because the conversations followed her lead. Open questions, reflections, affirmations, summaries and permission built trust, a closed question about wine damaged it briefly and an honest repair restored it. Cultural humility shaped the most important decision of the early sessions by keeping her values, not mine, at the center.

5

References

Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Tervalon, M., & Murray-García, J. (1998). Cultural humility versus cultural competence: A critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 9(2), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2010.0233

Wolever, R. Q., Simmons, L. A., Sforzo, G. A., Dill, D., Kaye, M., Bechard, E. M., Southard, M. E., Kennedy, M., Vosloo, J., & Yang, N. (2013). A systematic review of the literature on health and wellness coaching: Defining a key behavioral intervention in healthcare. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 2(4), 38-57. https://doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2013.042

HW450 Unit 3 instructions, in plain terms

Unit 3 commonly asks students to analyze the communication strategies that build a coaching relationship, using examples from sessions. Expect to name each strategy, show it in an exchange and explain its effect on the client. Instructors look for analysis of failures as well as successes, because a strategy that went wrong, and how it was repaired, reveals as much as one that worked. Cultural humility is often expected, especially where the client's values about family, care or food differ from the coach's assumptions. Sources on motivational interviewing and coaching support the analysis. The client's own description of what helped, if available, strengthens the conclusions. Close with what the coach will do differently, so the analysis improves future practice.

How this HW450 Unit 3 example is built

The paper opens with why communication is the intervention, using Wolever and colleagues. Sections on open questions, reflections, affirmations, summaries and asking permission each quote Teresa's sessions and explain the effect, including a highlighted line about her correcting a summary. The failed strategy section reports the closed question about wine, her defensive reply and the apology that reopened the subject. A cultural humility section shows the coach holding back a memory care suggestion and asking what caring for her mother meant, which later led her to raise adult day care herself. Teresa's own account, two strategies deliberately not used, what the analysis shows, changes the coach will make and a conclusion close the paper.

HW450 Unit 3 rubric: what earns full points

Communication analyses are scored on evidence from sessions, accuracy about each strategy and reflection. Each strategy should be illustrated with an actual exchange and its effect. Graders reward honest analysis of a strategy that failed, with the repair. Cultural humility should be shown in a decision, not only defined. Sources should support the analysis rather than replace it. Including the client's perspective strengthens the conclusions. A concluding section on changed practice shows the analysis will be used. Miller and Rollnick's book, the Wolever review and the cultural humility article each need an APA 7 entry. A short note on strategies deliberately held back, and why, shows the coach chose techniques rather than collecting them.

Common HW450 Unit 3 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Analyses of coaching communication often define open questions and reflections without showing a single real exchange. Another common weakness is presenting only successes, which makes the analysis read like a sales pitch. Some writers confuse affirmations with praise of results. Cultural humility is frequently reduced to noting the client's ethnicity. Analyses that never say what the coach will change miss the purpose of reflective practice. Before writing, pick three moments from your sessions where the client's response changed, and identify what you said just before. Describe those moments to us, and we can help you analyze what made the difference. Writers also skip the repair after a misstep, which is where coaching skill shows most clearly.

Get an HW450 Unit 3 example written to your instructions

Send the coaching situation and the instructions with the rubric. A custom analysis shows which strategies were used and how they worked. The first is free, back within 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More HW450 papers and BS in Health and Wellness samples

HW450 Unit 3 questions, answered

Which strategies are usually analyzed?

Open questions, affirmations, reflective listening, summaries, asking permission and cultural humility.

Should the analysis include mistakes?

Yes. A strategy that did not work teaches as much as one that did.

What is cultural humility?

An ongoing stance of self-reflection and openness to learning from the client about their life and culture.

Where can I find a free HW450 Unit 3 sample paper?

The complete HW450 Unit 3 communication strategies analysis is published on this page, examining what built a coaching relationship with a caregiver over three sessions, including one failed question.

What strategy failed in the HW450 Unit 3 sample?

A closed question counting her glasses of wine, which felt like an audit; an open apology and a reflection about what the evening was like repaired the conversation.