| Course | HW320 Contemporary Diet and Nutrition |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 10 |
| Paper type | Nutrition analysis report |
| Length | About 1,100 words, 7 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Health and Wellness |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HW320 Unit 10
Three Diets in Two Years, One Report: A Unit 10 Nutrition Analysis Report Written for a Returning Client
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
HW320: Contemporary Diet and Nutrition
Unit 10 Nutrition Analysis Report
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The client, her record and her history are composite; the reference intakes, dietary guidelines, inpatient diet study and app accuracy study cited are real.
Summary for Rachel
You kept a three-day food record in your phone app, and this report compares it with the nutrition standards for women your age. Two things you are doing well: your protein and iron intakes meet the recommendations, and you eat breakfast every day. Two things worth working on: your potassium is below the recommended amount, and added sugars make up more of your calories than the guidelines suggest. One referral: because you mentioned frequent headaches and fatigue, please raise those with your physician, since a food record cannot explain them.
Background
Rachel, a composite 39-year-old elementary school librarian and mother of two, has tried three eating patterns in the past two years: a ketogenic diet for four months, a plant-based "reset" for six weeks and, most recently, "clean eating," which she describes as avoiding anything packaged. She dropped each because it was hard to keep up with a family. She asked for a report that tells her where she stands now, without a new diet.
Method and Reliability
Rachel recorded three days, two weekdays and a Saturday, in a free tracking app. Following the method from Unit 3, each entry was marked by how it was captured and where its values came from. Eleven of 16 entries were logged at the time from verified database entries; five were remembered later or relied on user-created entries, mainly weekend dinners. Tracking apps tend to give energy and macronutrient values close to research databases but can underestimate some nutrients, particularly when user entries are used (Griffiths et al., 2018). The averages below are estimates.
Intake Against the Standards
Following Unit 4, each nutrient is compared with the Dietary Reference Intake for women aged 31 to 50, not with label Daily Values.
1. Energy: about 1,950 calories a day, which seems consistent with her stable weight.
2. Protein: 78 grams, above the RDA of 0.8 grams per kilogram, about 54 grams at her weight (Institute of Medicine, 2005). Adequate.
3. Iron: 17 milligrams, near the RDA of 18 milligrams for women 31 to 50. Adequate.
4. Calcium: 1,020 milligrams, meeting the RDA of 1,000 milligrams.
5. Potassium: 2,100 milligrams, below the Adequate Intake of 2,600 milligrams for women (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine [NASEM], 2019). Intake below an Adequate Intake cannot be called deficient, but it suggests room for more fruits, vegetables, beans and dairy.
6. Added sugars: about 64 grams, roughly 13 percent of energy, above the guideline limit of less than 10 percent (U.S. Department of Agriculture & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2020). Most came from flavored coffee drinks and the granola bars she packs for her children and herself.
7. Sodium: 2,500 milligrams, a little over the 2,300 milligram level that the sodium report links to lower chronic disease risk (NASEM, 2019).
The Claims She Has Met
Following Unit 5, each of her three past patterns is described briefly by what the evidence supports.
Keto. Very low carbohydrate diets can produce weight loss, but they are not uniquely effective. In a tightly controlled inpatient study, adults ate more calories on an animal-based ketogenic diet than on a plant-based low-fat diet when both were offered freely (Hall et al., 2021). Rachel's experience, that keto was hard to sustain with a family, is common.
Plant-based reset. Diets built around vegetables, fruits, whole grains and beans are consistent with the guidelines and would help her potassium. The word "reset" has no scientific meaning.
Clean eating. Avoiding all packaged food is not required for a healthy diet, and the term has no definition. Some packaged foods, such as canned beans, frozen vegetables and plain yogurt, are useful and inexpensive.
None of Rachel's three diets was wrong in every respect, but each asked her to follow rules that did not fit her family's life, and the record shows she needs two small changes, not a fourth diet.
What the Record Says About Her Pattern
Looking across the three days, Rachel's meals follow a clear rhythm. Weekday breakfasts and lunches are planned and similar from day to day, built around eggs or yogurt, whole-grain bread and leftovers. Weekday afternoons bring a flavored coffee and a granola bar in the school library. Dinners vary with her children's activities, and Saturday was the least structured day, with a late brunch and takeout. Most of her added sugars arrived between two and four in the afternoon, and most of her sodium arrived at dinner on the busiest evenings. Vegetables appeared at only three of nine main meals.
That pattern matters more than any single number. It shows that the planned parts of her day already work well, and that the gaps sit in the unplanned parts: the afternoon slump and the rushed dinners. Any suggestion should fit those moments rather than reorganize her whole diet, which is what the three earlier patterns tried to do.
Suggestions Within My Scope
1. Potassium: add one serving of fruit at lunch and beans or lentils to two dinners a week.
2. Added sugars: switch the flavored coffee to a smaller size or unsweetened version most days, and compare granola bar labels for added sugars.
3. Keep what works: breakfast every day and her current protein foods.
Why Not a Fourth Diet
Rachel's history suggests that she does not lack willpower or information. Each pattern she tried asked her to follow a complete set of rules, and each failed when the rules collided with family meals, school schedules or cost. A report that handed her a new set of rules would likely meet the same end. The suggestions above are small on purpose: each changes one recurring moment in her week and leaves the rest of her eating, which mostly meets the standards, alone.
Where Her Questions Go Next
Her headaches and fatigue go to her physician, who can check for causes such as anemia, thyroid problems or sleep disorders that a food record cannot detect. If she wants help planning meals for the whole family, a registered dietitian could offer more individual guidance than a wellness report.
Limits
Three days estimate usual intake poorly, especially for nutrients that vary from day to day. Some entries were remembered rather than logged. No laboratory values were available.
References
Griffiths, C., Harnack, L., & Pereira, M. A. (2018). Assessment of the accuracy of nutrient calculations of five popular nutrition tracking applications. Public Health Nutrition, 21(8), 1495-1502. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980018000393
Hall, K. D., Guo, J., Courville, A. B., Boring, J., Brychta, R., Chen, K. Y., Darcey, V., Forde, C. G., Gharib, A. M., Gallagher, I., Howard, R., Joseph, P. V., Milley, L., Ouwerkerk, R., Raisinger, K., Rozga, I., Schick, A., Stagliano, M., Torres, S., . . . Chung, S. T. (2021). Effect of a plant-based, low-fat diet versus an animal-based, ketogenic diet on ad libitum energy intake. Nature Medicine, 27(2), 344-353. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-01209-1
Institute of Medicine. (2005). Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10490
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Dietary reference intakes for sodium and potassium. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25353
U.S. Department of Agriculture & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2020). Dietary guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025 (9th ed.). https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov
Reading the HW 320 Unit 10 instructions
The final report asks students to bring together recording, standards comparison, claim evaluation and client communication in one document for a described person. Prompts usually require a plain-language summary, the method and its reliability, intake compared with appropriate reference values, discussion of any diets or claims the client has encountered, suggestions within scope and referrals. Write the summary so the client could read it in a few minutes. Use reference intakes for the client's age and sex. Treat past diets as information, saying what evidence supports and what each asked of her life. Look for patterns across days, not only totals. Keep suggestions small and specific. Name what belongs to a physician or dietitian. Eight to ten pages is typical.
Inside the HW320 Unit 10 example
The summary page, addressed to Rachel, lists two strengths, two gaps and a referral for headaches and fatigue. Background describes her three earlier patterns and why she dropped each. A method section reports that eleven of sixteen entries were logged at the time from verified values. Seven numbered comparisons follow, flagging potassium and added sugars. A claims section reviews keto with an inpatient study, the plant-based reset and clean eating, and the highlighted sentence concludes she needs two changes, not a new diet. A pattern section locates sugars in the afternoon and sodium at busy dinners. Suggestions, an explanation of why a fourth diet would fail, referrals and limits close the report.
Reading the HW320 Unit 10 grading rubric
Final report rubrics in HW320 generally assess integration of the term's methods, accuracy of analysis, quality of client communication and appropriate scope. Integration is judged by whether recording reliability, standards comparison and claim evaluation work together. Accuracy covers reference values, calculations and evidence statements. Communication is scored on the summary, plain language and organization. Suggestions earn points when they are specific, realistic and tied to findings. Referral for questions outside the wellness role is assessed under scope. APA citations and a professional layout account for the rest. Reports that read like a lab write-up, or that hand the client a new diet plan, tend to lose communication points.
HW320 Unit 10 help from the desk
Final reports are often written for the instructor rather than the client, with dense methods sections and no readable summary. Another weakness is listing every nutrient without saying which matter. Students sometimes judge past diets harshly, which can alienate the reader, or endorse one uncritically. Patterns across the day are rarely examined, though they show where changes would fit. Suggestions tend to be either vague or a complete meal plan. Referrals for symptoms are frequently missing. If your earlier units are complete and you need to build them into a report for one person, send them with the client details, and a writer can help you integrate them around a summary she could read.
Get an HW320 Unit 10 example written to your instructions
Send the Unit 10 guidelines and rubric with the earlier work the report should draw on, whether your own record and analyses or a case your instructor supplied. The report is assembled for the client first and the grader second, figures rechecked and scope marked, and it comes back within 24-48h. The first sample is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More HW320 papers and BS in Health and Wellness samples
- HW320 Unit 1: Food Belief Post
- HW320 Unit 2: Macronutrient Analysis
- HW320 Unit 3: Dietary Intake Record
- HW320 Unit 4: Reference Standard Comparison
- HW320 Unit 5: Nutrition Claim Evaluation
- HW320 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- HW320 Unit 7: Food Label Analysis
- HW320 Unit 8: Special Population Guidance
- HW320 Unit 9: Client Nutrition Memo
- HW315 Unit 10: Wellness Model Portfolio
- HW310 Unit 10: Integrative Portfolio
- HD499 Unit 10: Capstone Document
- HD480 Unit 10: Communication Portfolio
HW320 Unit 10 questions, answered
How plain should the language be in a client-ready report?
Plain enough that an adult without science training could follow the main body on first reading. Define any necessary term once, prefer short sentences, and replace abbreviations such as RDA or AMDR with what they mean. Technical precision still belongs in the appendices and citations, where your instructor will look for it. Reading the summary aloud is a quick test of whether it works.
What should the report do with diets the client tried before?
Treat each one as information rather than as a mistake. Say what the evidence supports about the pattern, what it asked of her day to day, and why it may not have lasted, drawing on what the case tells you. A fair paragraph on each keeps the client reading, and graders in this course look for claims weighed rather than dismissed.
How long should the summary page be?
One page, and often less. It should give the main findings, the strengths and gaps, and the next step, in language the client could read quickly. If a finding cannot be put in a sentence or two without jargon, it probably belongs in the body with a plain opening line. The summary should introduce nothing the rest of the report does not support.
Where can I find a free HW320 Unit 10 sample paper?
This page presents a complete Unit 10 nutrition analysis report for a client who tried three diets, with a summary page, standards comparison, claims review, margin notes and APA references.
Why does the report avoid recommending a new diet?
Each of her three past diets failed when its rules collided with family life. Her record mostly meets the standards, so small changes at the two moments where gaps appear are more likely to last.