| Course | HS440 Finance for Health Care |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 8 |
| Paper type | Break-even analysis |
| Length | About 550 words, 5 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Health Science |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HS440 Unit 8
Break-Even Just Beyond the Last Slot: A Unit 8 Break-Even Analysis of a Composite Endoscopy Center
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
HS440: Finance for Health Care
Unit 8 Break-Even Analysis
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The center, its payments, costs and options are composite; the finance texts cited are real.
Contribution by Payer
Each payer's contribution is its payment per case minus the 168 dollars of variable cost.
Commercial: 1,180 paid, 1,012 contribution. Medicare: 640 paid, 472 contribution. Medicaid: 380 paid, 212 contribution. Self-pay: 95 collected, minus 73 contribution.
Weighted by last year's mix of 1,960 commercial, 2,270 Medicare, 1,240 Medicaid and 350 self-pay cases, total contribution was 3,292,290 dollars across 5,820 cases, an average of 565.69 per case.
Break-Even Volume
Break-even cases equal fixed costs divided by average contribution per case (Pink & Song, 2020). Fixed costs last year were 3,410,000 dollars. 3,410,000 divided by 565.69 is 6,028 cases.
At twelve cases per room-day, 6,028 cases need 502.3 room-days. The center has 500.
The center cannot break even at last year's mix no matter how well it schedules, because the break-even point sits two and a third room-days past the last slot it owns.
The Same Calculation at the Prior Year's Mix
In the prior year, commercial cases were 2,252, Medicare 2,142, Medicaid 846 and self-pay 300, for an average contribution of 622.29 dollars. At that mix, break-even with the same fixed costs would have been 5,480 cases, about 91 percent of capacity. The rooms did not change; the mix moved break-even out of reach.
Three Ways Back Inside Capacity
Option 1: change the mix of self-pay patients. A financial counselor who helps eligible self-pay patients enroll in Medicaid turns a minus 73 contribution into plus 212. If 200 of last year's 350 self-pay patients had been enrolled, average contribution would have risen by about 9.79 dollars, to 575.48, and break-even would fall to 5,926 cases, inside capacity. The counselor's cost, about 35,000 dollars a year, must be added to fixed costs, which moves break-even back to about 5,986, still inside.
Option 2: add Saturday sessions. Opening one room on 50 Saturdays adds 600 slots and about 105,000 dollars of staffing. New fixed costs of 3,515,000 divided by 565.69 give break-even at 6,214 cases, inside the new capacity of 6,600 but requiring the center to fill 94 percent of all slots.
Option 3: recover commercial volume. Each 100 cases shifted from Medicaid back to commercial raises total contribution by 80,000 dollars, cutting break-even by about 140 cases. This depends on winning back the employer network the center lost, which is outside its direct control.
Limits
Break-even analysis assumes the mix, payments and variable cost stay constant across volume, which is rarely exact. It ignores timing and cash, and it treats fixed costs as truly fixed, though some, like staffing, are step costs. It is a planning tool, not a forecast (Cleverley & Cleverley, 2018), and its results should be read as ranges once uncertainty in mix and payment is considered (Finkler et al., 2019).
Conclusion
At last year's mix the center's break-even lies just beyond its capacity. Enrolling eligible self-pay patients is the cheapest step and alone brings break-even inside the rooms. Saturday sessions add room but demand high fill. Recovering commercial patients would help most but is least certain.
References
Cleverley, W. O., & Cleverley, J. O. (2018). Essentials of health care finance (8th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Finkler, S. A., Calabrese, T. D., & Smith, D. L. (2019). Financial management for public, health, and not-for-profit organizations (6th ed.). CQ Press.
Pink, G. H., & Song, P. H. (2020). Gapenski's healthcare finance: An introduction to accounting and financial management (7th ed.). Health Administration Press.
Reading the HS 440 Unit 8 instructions
Unit 8 usually asks for a break-even analysis of a service, often with several payers, and a discussion of what would change the result. Analyses commonly fill two to three pages. Marks follow a correct weighted contribution margin, correct break-even volume, comparison with capacity, and options priced with the same formula. Many sections reward converting break-even into an operational unit such as room-days or sessions, and comparing results under different payer mixes. State the method's assumptions and limits. Cite a finance text for the formula. Avoid options that would exclude patients by coverage, since those raise legal and ethical problems. Keep every option on the same footing, so the committee can compare them directly.
How the HS 440 Unit 8 example is put together
The analysis lists contribution by payer and weights it by last year's case counts. Break-even is computed from fixed costs and converted to room-days; the highlighted sentence explains why scheduling cannot close the gap. A section repeats the calculation at the prior year's mix to show how mix moved break-even. Three options follow, each with its effect on contribution or fixed cost and the new break-even: a financial counselor enrolling self-pay patients, one Saturday room on fifty weekends and recovery of commercial cases. A limits section notes constant mix and price assumptions, citing two finance texts, and the conclusion ranks the options by cost and certainty.
HS440 Unit 8 rubric: what earns full points
Break-even analyses are graded mainly on the correctness of the weighted contribution and break-even volume and on the quality of the options analysis. Correctness covers each payer's contribution, the weighting and the division. Comparison with capacity earns credit because it turns a number into a finding. Options are rewarded when each is priced through the same formula, including any added fixed cost. A comparison across payer mixes shows understanding of what drives the result. Stating limits, such as constant mix, adds credit. Clear arithmetic and plain conclusions make the analysis easy to follow and grade. Showing the prior-year comparison is a quick way to prove that mix, not efficiency, moved the result.
HS440 Unit 8 help from the desk
A typical error is computing break-even from average payment without subtracting variable cost. Another is forgetting to add an option's own cost, such as a counselor's salary or Saturday staffing, to fixed costs. Some students drop self-pay cases from the analysis to improve the result, which misstates reality. Others stop at the number of cases without comparing it with capacity. Ignoring how much the result depends on mix leaves the most important finding out. If your service has a single price and cost, share them, and break-even reduces to one division that can be worked through with you. Reporting break-even only in cases, without room-days or sessions, leaves a manager unable to see it on a schedule.
Get an HS440 Unit 8 example written to your instructions
The fixed costs, payer mix, payment rates and variable cost per case in the Unit 8 case decide the answer, so forward them along with whatever rubric the section grades against. Break-even is computed by payer-weighted contribution and set against capacity, and any option the case suggests is priced. A first request costs nothing; expect it back in 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More HS440 papers and BS in Health Science samples
- HS440 Unit 1: Payer Mix Discussion Post
- HS440 Unit 2: Financial Statement Review
- HS440 Unit 3: Cost Behavior Analysis
- HS440 Unit 4: Financial Ratio Analysis
- HS440 Unit 5: Operating Budget Build
- HS440 Unit 6: Variance Report
- HS440 Unit 7: Seminar Reflection on Adjustments
- HS440 Unit 9: Capital Request Memo
- HS440 Unit 10: Financial Management Report
- HS450 Unit 8: Change Readiness Assessment
- HS420 Unit 8: Privacy and Access Memo
- HS460 Unit 8: Risk Register
- HS345 Unit 8: Hypothesis Test Writeup
HS440 Unit 8 questions, answered
Why can't the center simply raise its prices?
Because most of its revenue comes from payers who set or negotiate the payment, not from the list price. Raising charges changes the chargemaster and little else; Medicare and Medicaid pay their own rates, and commercial contracts move only at renegotiation. That is why the analysis treats payment per case as given and looks at mix and volume instead.
Should the self-pay row be excluded to improve the result?
No. A self-pay case pays less than its supplies here, but excluding those patients from the analysis would misstate what the center actually faces, and nonprofit parents usually carry financial assistance obligations. The sample keeps the row, shows its negative contribution, and notes that screening self-pay patients for coverage is one of the few levers that improves it.
What if the problem gives a single price and a single variable cost?
Then break-even is fixed costs divided by that one contribution margin, and the payer weighting step is skipped. Many HS440 problems simplify this way at first. The sample follows whichever the case supplies, and when the data allow it, adds a sentence on how a change in mix would move the answer.
Where can I find a free HS440 Unit 8 sample paper?
The full Unit 8 break-even analysis is here, finding a composite endoscopy center's break-even just past its capacity and pricing three options.
How do you calculate break-even with several payers?
Weight each payer's contribution per case by its share of cases to get an average contribution, then divide fixed costs by that average.