HS420 · Unit 3

HS420 Unit 3 workflow analysis example

Health Informatics Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Nobody at composite Wrenfield Family Clinic could say whether a patient sent to a specialist was ever seen, so an HS420 Unit 3 workflow analysis wrote down, step by step, what happens to a referral today. Across one composite month of [184] referrals, the process loses about [31] percent of them before any report comes back.

What this page holds

Of [184] referrals in a month, about [31] percent never returned a specialist's report; mapping today's process in HS420 Unit 3 shows where they went missing. Searches like "hs 420 unit 3 assignment example", "hs420 unit 3 sample" and "hs420 unit 3 example" land here.

What a finished HS420 Unit 3 workflow analysis looks like

A swimlane map carries the analysis, with lanes for provider, medical assistant, referral coordinator, specialist office and patient. The current process runs to [17] steps from the provider's order to a report filed in the chart, and each step is numbered to match a table beneath. Three kinds of marks sit on the map: a triangle wherever the same data is typed a second time, a clock where work waits in a queue, and a question mark where nobody owns the next step. Question marks cluster at the end, after the specialist's office has the referral and before any report returns. The table gives each step its actor, the system or paper used, the average wait and what happens when it fails. A second table counts where the [57] lost referrals stopped.

How a HS420 Unit 3 example is structured

Scope and method come first: one month, all outgoing referrals, data from the coordinator's spreadsheet and the record, plus interviews with the coordinator and two medical assistants. The current-state map follows, then its step table. Analysis is organized around the three marks, duplicate entry, waiting and unowned steps, and each gets a paragraph with counts. The central finding is placed after the evidence rather than before it: most losses occur because no system or person is assigned to notice a missing report. A brief section describes what a revised process would need to do, close the loop, remove one entry and assign ownership, without choosing a product or redrawing the map. A limits paragraph names what one month cannot show, such as seasonal volume and referrals the patient declined.

One month, every referral

Scope, data sources and interviews stated first, so the reader knows the map describes observed practice rather than written policy.

Seventeen steps across five lanes

The current process drawn in full, from order to filed report, with every step numbered to match the table.

Triangles, clocks, question marks

Duplicate entry, queued waiting and unowned steps marked on the map and counted, each discussed in its own paragraph.

Where [57] referrals stopped

A count of lost referrals by the step where they stalled, most of them after the specialist office received them.

What any fix must do

Three conditions for a revised process, stated without a product or a redrawn map, since those belong to later units.

Where marks go in HS420 Unit 3

The most expensive omission is a current state that is really a policy. A map drawn from the referral procedure in a manual shows a process that works; the observed one shows where it does not, and HS420 criteria typically reward the second. Proposals that arrive before the analysis also cost points, because documentation normally comes first in this unit and a fix without a baseline cannot be measured. Maps without numbers read as opinion. Counting waits, retyped fields and lost cases turns them into evidence. Weaker analyses stop when the referral leaves the building, missing the stretch where most losses happen. The patient's lane matters as well, since patients who never schedule are part of the process whether or not the clinic tracks them.

Get a HS420 Unit 3 example written to your instructions

Workflow analyses start from a process, so name the one assigned in Unit 3, or a process you intend to observe, then add the rubric and any mapping format required. The map, step table and counts are built on that process as it runs now. It is ready within 24-48h, and the first custom sample is free.

HS420 Unit 3 questions, answered

What mapping format does a workflow analysis use?

Swimlane maps are the most common because they show who does each step, but basic flowcharts and numbered step tables also appear in HS420 sections. The format matters less than consistency: every step on the map should appear in any table, with the same number. Free online diagram editors are adequate for coursework.

Can a current state include steps the staff admit they skip?

It should. A map that shows the documented procedure while staff skip two steps every day misrepresents the process being analyzed. The example records a skipped step as it happens, marked and explained, because skipped steps often point to the real problem. Keep individuals unnamed, and describe the step rather than the person.

Why not propose the fix in Unit 3?

Because a fix designed before the current state is understood tends to solve the wrong problem. The example lists what any fix must accomplish and stops there. In many courses a later unit asks for requirements and another for a recommendation, and a clean baseline makes both easier to argue and to grade.