| Course | HS200 Diseases of the Human Body |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 3 |
| Paper type | System disorder profile |
| Length | About 840 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Health Science |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HS200 Unit 3
Sight Lost From the Edges Inward: A Unit 3 System Disorder Profile of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, Cause First
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
HS200: Diseases of the Human Body
Unit 3 System Disorder Profile
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The illustrative patient is composite; the review, screening statement and textbook cited are real.
Normal Structure and Function
The front of the eye is filled with a clear fluid called aqueous humor, made continuously by a structure behind the iris. The fluid flows forward through the pupil and drains out of the eye through a spongy tissue called the trabecular meshwork, which sits in the narrow corner formed by the colored iris and the clear front window of the eye. The balance between production and drainage sets the pressure inside the eye. At the back of the eye, about a million nerve fibers from the retina gather at the optic nerve head, where they leave the eye and carry visual signals to the brain.
What Glaucoma Is
Glaucoma is a group of diseases in which the optic nerve is progressively damaged, producing a characteristic pattern of vision loss. In the open-angle form, which accounts for most cases in the United States, the drainage angle looks open on examination, yet the nerve fibers die over years. Raised eye pressure is the main known risk factor and the only one that treatment can change, but some people develop damage at normal pressures and others tolerate high pressures without damage (Weinreb et al., 2014).
Causes and Risk Factors
The exact cause is not fully known. Contributing factors include increased resistance to outflow in the trabecular meshwork, which raises eye pressure; susceptibility of the optic nerve head to mechanical stress; and possibly reduced blood flow to the nerve. Risk rises with age, with a family history of glaucoma and with African or Hispanic ancestry. Thinner corneas and nearsightedness are also associated with higher risk.
Mechanism of Damage
Higher pressure inside the eye pushes on the optic nerve head, where the nerve fibers bend as they exit through a sieve-like plate. Over time, this stress, together with other factors, damages the fibers and their cell bodies in the retina, which die through a process of programmed cell death. As fibers are lost, the optic nerve head develops a deepened, hollowed appearance called cupping, visible to an examiner.
Presentation: Why It Is Silent
The fibers lost first usually carry signals from the edges of the visual field, not from the center. The brain fills in small gaps, and the other eye covers for the affected one, so a person notices nothing. Central vision, used for reading and recognizing faces, is often preserved until late. By the time someone notices bumping into objects or missing things to the side, a large share of the nerve may be gone, and that loss cannot be recovered.
Glaucoma takes vision from the edges inward, and the brain hides the gaps so well that the person is often the last to know.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis rests on three kinds of evidence gathered by an eye care professional: the appearance of the optic nerve head, often imaged with optical coherence tomography, which measures the thickness of the nerve fiber layer; visual field testing, which maps blind spots; and measurement of eye pressure. Pressure alone does not diagnose glaucoma, since some people with damage have normal pressures.
Treatment
All current treatment lowers eye pressure, the one modifiable factor. Eye drops either reduce fluid production or increase drainage. Laser treatment of the trabecular meshwork can improve outflow and is sometimes used first. Surgery creates a new drainage path when other measures fail. Treatment slows or stops further loss but does not restore lost vision (Weinreb et al., 2014).
Prevention and Screening
Because the disease is silent and the damage permanent, early detection is the main protection. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force concluded in 2022 that evidence was insufficient to recommend for or against screening adults without symptoms in primary care (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2022). In practice, people at higher risk, such as older adults, those with a family history and people of African ancestry, are commonly advised to have regular comprehensive eye examinations.
Illustrative Patient
A composite 63-year-old man whose mother went blind from glaucoma has never had a dilated eye examination. At a vision screening for a new driver's license, he misses targets in his left visual field. An eye examination shows cupping of both optic nerves, raised pressure and early field loss in both eyes, worse on the left. He begins pressure-lowering drops and will be followed with regular field tests and imaging. His children are advised to start regular eye examinations earlier than usual because of the family history, and he is taught that skipping drops, which cause no change he can feel, allows the silent loss to continue.
Summary
Open-angle glaucoma links a drainage problem and a vulnerable optic nerve to slow, painless loss of side vision. Its silence explains its danger, and its single modifiable factor explains its treatment (Rogers, 2023).
References
Rogers, J. L. (Ed.). (2023). McCance & Huether's pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (9th ed.). Elsevier.
US Preventive Services Task Force, Mangione, C. M., Barry, M. J., Nicholson, W. K., Cabana, M., Chelmow, D., Coker, T. R., Davis, E. M., Donahue, K. E., Epling, J. W., JaƩn, C. R., Krist, A. H., Kubik, M., Li, L., Ogedegbe, G., Pbert, L., Ruiz, J. M., Simon, M. A., Stevermer, J., & Wong, J. B. (2022). Screening for primary open-angle glaucoma: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 327(20), 1992-1997. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.7013
Weinreb, R. N., Aung, T., & Medeiros, F. A. (2014). The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: A review. JAMA, 311(18), 1901-1911. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.3192
The Purdue Global HS200 Unit 3 instructions
The third unit commonly asks students to choose a disorder within the body system being studied and profile it in a set order, often cause, mechanism, signs and symptoms, diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Profiles of three to five pages are typical. Instructors look for normal structure and function explained first, so that the disorder can be understood as a departure from normal. Each section should connect to the mechanism rather than stand alone. Treatment is usually a section rather than the focus, since the course centers on disease processes. Many prompts reward an illustrative case. Current reviews and screening guidance, cited with year, are commonly expected alongside the textbook.
How the HS 200 Unit 3 example is put together
The profile explains how fluid is made and drained and how nerve fibers form the optic nerve. It defines glaucoma and notes that some people are damaged at normal pressures. Causes and risk factors precede the mechanism of nerve stress, cell death and cupping. The presentation section explains why side vision goes first and why people do not notice; the highlighted sentence captures this. Diagnosis covers imaging, visual fields and pressure. Treatment explains drops, laser and surgery as ways to lower pressure. Prevention cites the 2022 screening statement, and a composite case and summary close the profile. Each section opens with a sentence tying it back to the drainage and pressure explained at the start.
HS200 Unit 3 rubric: what earns full points
Disorder profiles are generally graded on completeness of the required sections, accuracy, the link between mechanism and each later section, use of current sources and writing. Linking mechanism to presentation and treatment usually carries the most weight, because it distinguishes understanding from a summary of facts. Completeness rewards following the prompt's order. Accuracy matters for risk factors, diagnostic tests and the role of pressure. Sources earn credit when current reviews and guidance are cited with dates. An illustrative case that applies the profile can lift the grade. Clear headings, plain explanations of technical terms and APA style complete the score. A profile that would let a reader predict which patients are at highest risk usually stands out.
HS200 Unit 3 help: mistakes that cost points
The most frequent weakness is a profile that treats each section as a separate list, so the mechanism never explains the symptoms or treatment. Another is defining glaucoma simply as high eye pressure, which is inaccurate. Some students skip normal structure, leaving readers unable to follow the mechanism. Others devote most of the paper to treatment. Outdated screening advice weakens the prevention section. If you were assigned a different system or disorder, perhaps the kidney and polycystic kidney disease or the skin and psoriasis, send the prompt, and we will write the profile in the order your section requires. Copying a screening recommendation without its year can mislead readers when guidance changes.
Get an HS200 Unit 3 example written to your instructions
Tell us the system and disorder set for Unit 3, or whether any system may be chosen, and include the instructions plus a rubric listing the required headings. That heading order is kept exactly in a profile ready within 24-48h. Your first custom sample costs nothing, and any case detail stays composite. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More HS200 papers and BS in Health Science samples
- HS200 Unit 1: Finding Versus Disease Discussion Post
- HS200 Unit 2: Inflammation and Immunity Paper
- HS200 Unit 4: Sign and Symptom Worksheet
- HS200 Unit 5: Case Scenario Analysis
- HS200 Unit 6: Differential Comparison
- HS200 Unit 7: Seminar Reflection
- HS200 Unit 8: Diagnostic Test Rationale
- HS200 Unit 9: Risk and Prevention Brief
- HS200 Unit 10: Pathophysiology Case Report
- HS140 Unit 3: Dosage Calculation Practice Set
- HS111 Unit 3: Integumentary System Glossary
- HS499 Unit 3: Problem Statement
HS200 Unit 3 questions, answered
Can the profile cover a disorder from any system?
Usually within whatever system the unit is teaching, which varies by section. Where the choice is open, disorders with a clear chain from cause to sign are the most rewarding to profile: osteoporosis, hypothyroidism, peptic ulcer disease, asthma. Conditions with an unknown cause can work too, provided the profile says what is known about mechanism and marks the gap honestly.
How much should the profile say about treatment?
A section, not the bulk of the paper. HS200 is about disease processes, so management appears to show that each intervention acts on a step already explained. Dosing and prescribing detail belong to other courses and usually earn nothing here. One sentence naming a drug class and the mechanism it targets is worth more than a paragraph of brand names.
Is a table of risk factors acceptable?
Often, if the prompt allows tables and the text still explains them. A table listing each risk factor beside the side of remodeling it affects can save space and make the logic visible. What loses points is a table standing in for the mechanism section, with the connecting explanation left out because the grid seemed to cover it already.
Where can I find a free HS200 Unit 3 sample paper?
The complete Unit 3 profile of open-angle glaucoma is posted here, written in cause-first order with an illustrative case.
Why does glaucoma go unnoticed for years?
It destroys nerve fibers carrying side vision first, the brain fills in small gaps and the other eye compensates, so central vision feels normal until damage is advanced.