| Course | HR410 Talent Development and Learning |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 7 |
| Paper type | Transfer of training plan |
| Length | About 880 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Business Administration (Human Resources) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HR410 Unit 7
The Monday After the Last Session: A Unit 7 Transfer of Training Plan for Other-Coverage Updates
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
HR410: Talent Development and Learning
Unit 7 Transfer of Training Plan
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Ridgemont Health Plan, its staff and every date are composite and illustrative; the sources cited are real.
Why Transfer Needs a Plan
Baldwin and Ford (1988) described transfer of training as depending on three things: the trainee, the design of the training and the work environment the trainee returns to. The Unit 5 design addresses the second. This plan addresses the third, which the gap analysis showed is where tenured representatives' errors come from. A recent hire who leaves the final session able to split a coverage period, and then meets a screen default, a handle-time scorecard and a team lead who never asks, is likely to lose the skill within weeks.
The Matrix
Rows are people. Columns are before, during and after the program.
Team lead. Before: meets each recent hire for ten minutes to agree on what the program is for and which cases the representative finds hardest. During: releases the representative for every session and covers the queue. After: reviews five audited updates per representative within the first ten working days, giving feedback within one working day of each.
Representative. Before: brings two live cases from the last month that caused trouble. During: writes a short plan naming the three case types most likely to arise on shift and how to handle each. After: uses the job aid on every other-coverage update for thirty days and flags any case the job aid does not cover.
Quality analyst. Before: sets the baseline error rate for each representative from the last three months. During: grades the final check. After: audits all of each recent hire's other-coverage updates for thirty days, rather than the usual sample, and sends results to the team lead daily.
Peer champion. Before: one senior representative per site is named champion and joins the session 3 dry run. During: helps coach in session 2. After: sits at a desk near the recent hires for two weeks and takes questions on hard cases.
Membership systems team. Before: removes the coverage-period default, so the old single date no longer fills in on its own. During: keeps the practice system's data current. After: reviews any screen issue the representatives flag within a week.
Supports in the First Thirty Days
A handle-time exception code. For thirty days, other-coverage updates are excluded from each representative's handle-time score. After thirty days, operations sets a revised target based on the average time for correct updates.
The job aid at every desk. One laminated page of the rules for which plan pays first and the reason codes, plus the same page pinned in the membership system's help panel.
Two follow-up cases. The day 5 and day 15 cases from the Unit 5 design arrive in each representative's queue.
A trained skill survives on the floor only when the people around the representative ask for it, measure it and stop rewarding the shortcut.
The Barriers Table
Barrier: team leads too busy for reviews. Response: reviews limited to five updates, scheduled in each lead's calendar before the program starts.
Barrier: handle-time pressure returns after thirty days. Response: the revised target is set before the exception ends.
Barrier: few split-period cases arrive on the job. Response: the follow-up cases guarantee at least four practice cases.
Barrier: the champion is pulled back to the phones. Response: the champion's queue time is reduced by a third for two weeks, approved by the operations manager.
The Evidence Behind the Plan
Pooling transfer studies, Blume et al. (2010) linked stronger transfer to backing from supervisors and peers and to a workplace climate that expects new skills to be used. Grossman and Salas (2011), sorting the research for practitioners, put manager backing, real chances to use the skill and follow-up near the top of their list. Each row of the matrix applies one of these.
What Team Leads Will Be Told
Team leads will receive a one-page brief two weeks before the program. It explains what the recent hires are learning, why the exception code exists and what a good review looks like: the lead opens each audited update with the representative, asks which plan pays first and why, and names one thing to keep doing and one to change. The brief also explains that the leads' own handle-time scores will not be penalized for the exception period, since a lead who fears that penalty will quietly discourage the slower, correct updates the program teaches.
When the Plan Ends
Most supports end at thirty days, and the peer champion's role at two weeks. The job aid stays permanently. If any recent hire's error rate at thirty days is still above twice the standard, the team lead and quality analyst extend the full audit and review for that representative for another thirty days and request targeted coaching from the training team.
How Transfer Will Be Checked
At thirty days, the quality analyst reports each recent hire's error rate on other-coverage updates against the baseline. At ninety days, the Unit 9 evaluation measures behavior and results across both sites.
References
Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x
Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Huang, J. L. (2010). Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36(4), 1065-1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352880
Grossman, R., & Salas, E. (2011). The transfer of training: What really matters. International Journal of Training and Development, 15(2), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2011.00373.x
HR410 Unit 7 instructions, in plain terms
Unit 7 in HR410 turns to what happens after the sessions end, when learners return to the job. Explain why transfer needs a plan, using a model of transfer. Build a matrix with the people involved as rows and before, during and after the program as columns, giving each person a specific, dated action in each column. Fix environmental obstacles before training where possible. Describe supports for the first weeks, such as exceptions to measures, job aids and follow-up cases. Build a barriers table with a response to each barrier. Explain what managers will be told and when supports end. Link each part of the plan to research on what predicts transfer. Say how transfer will be checked. About four pages arranged as a matrix of time against people is common for this plan.
How this HR410 Unit 7 example is built
The sample explains, with Baldwin and Ford, why the environment decides transfer. A matrix gives five roles actions before, during and after, with a margin note on fixing the screen first. Supports include a thirty-day exception code, a job aid and two follow-up cases, and the highlighted sentence states what keeps a skill alive. A barriers table answers four obstacles. Blume and colleagues and Grossman and Salas support each row, with a margin note linking rows to research. Sections cover the brief to team leads, including protection of their own scores, and what happens when supports end. Checks at thirty and ninety days close the plan.
Where the points sit in the HR410 Unit 7 rubric
The HR410 transfer plan is graded on whether it changes the environment learners return to. Instructors expect a model of transfer to frame the plan. The matrix should give every role specific, dated actions in each period. Fixing obstacles before training earns substantial credit. Supports should be concrete and time-limited. Barriers should have practical responses. Preparing managers shows awareness of who controls the environment. Linking actions to transfer research shows grounding. A plan for ending supports and checking transfer completes the work. Dates should line up with the program design and the evaluation plan, and transfer research should carry APA 7 citations.
HR410 Unit 7 help from the desk
Many HR410 transfer plans list good intentions, such as manager support, without saying who does what and when. Others start after training and miss obstacles that should be fixed first. Students often forget the measures that reward the old behavior. Barriers are listed without responses. Supports have no end date or no check. Frame the plan with a transfer model, build a dated matrix for every role, fix obstacles first, add time-limited supports, answer each barrier, brief managers, link actions to research and check transfer. Share your program design, and our team can help build the matrix row by row, starting with the obstacles to fix first.
Get an HR410 Unit 7 example written to your instructions
A program design from earlier work, or simply the case itself, is enough to plan transfer around; include the rubric and anything said about supervisors. The plan dates each role and pairs each barrier with a countermeasure, and it is back inside 24-48h. First samples cost nothing, and the contact center in them is composite. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More HR410 papers and BS in Business Administration (Human Resources) samples
- HR410 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- HR410 Unit 2: Needs Assessment
- HR410 Unit 3: Performance Gap Analysis
- HR410 Unit 4: Learning Objectives Set
- HR410 Unit 5: Program Design Outline
- HR410 Unit 6: Delivery Method Comparison
- HR410 Unit 8: Seminar Reflection
- HR410 Unit 9: Evaluation Design
- HR410 Unit 10: Development Strategy Report
- HR400 Unit 7: Candidate Evaluation Memo
HR410 Unit 7 questions, answered
Which transfer model does the example use?
Baldwin and Ford's, which groups the influences on transfer into trainee characteristics, training design and the work environment. The example applies it briefly and gives the environment most of the room, since that is where the composite center's obstacles sit. A section naming another model, such as Holton's, can be matched while keeping the time-by-people matrix.
Why fix the screen before training rather than after?
Because a representative who learns the correct split and then meets a screen defaulting to the wrong period will be corrected by the system every day. Training would lose that contest. The example makes the fix a precondition of delivery, and says so in the before column, so the environment supports the skill from the first live call.
Where can I find a free HR410 Unit 7 sample paper?
This page carries a full HR410 Unit 7 transfer of training plan with a dated matrix of roles before, during and after an other-coverage program.
What does the peer champion do in this plan?
One senior representative per site joins the sessions, then sits near recent hires for two weeks to answer hard cases without waiting for a team lead.
Why give handle time an exception for thirty days?
A correct update takes longer than the old shortcut. Removing it from handle-time scoring for a month keeps the measure from punishing the behavior the program teaches.