| Course | HI570 Legal and Ethical Issues in Health Information |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 3 |
| Paper type | Release of information decision |
| Length | About 800 words, 5 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | MS in Health Informatics |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HI570 Unit 3
At the Bedside but Not the Executor: A Unit 3 Release of Information Decision on a Daughter's Request for Her Father's Record
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
HI570: Legal and Ethical Issues in Health Information
Unit 3 Release of Information Decision
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Larchmere Health, the patient, his family and every date are composite; the regulations and sources cited are real.
Memorandum
To: Release of Information File
From: Privacy and Release Supervisor, Health Information Management
Date: April 22
Re: Request for the record of a deceased patient by his daughter
The Request
On April 21, the daughter of a patient who died on April 10 on a Larchmere medical unit submitted a written request for his complete medical record. She states that she wants to understand what happened in his last two weeks and may consider a claim. The record lists her as the emergency contact, and nursing notes describe her at the bedside on twelve of the fourteen days of the admission. Her brother is the named executor of the estate. She has no letters of administration or other appointment.
Authority, Part One: Is She a Personal Representative?
The Privacy Rule gives a dead patient's rights to whoever state law empowers to handle his affairs, usually an executor or court-appointed administrator (45 C.F.R. § 164.502, 2024). A personal representative stands in the patient's shoes and holds his right of access to the full designated record set. The daughter is not the executor and holds no other appointment. She is not his personal representative, and she cannot exercise his right of access.
Authority, Part Two: Does Another Provision Allow Disclosure?
A second route exists for relatives who helped with care or bills while the patient was alive: the hospital may share with such a relative whatever bears on the part they played, unless doing so is inconsistent with a prior expressed preference of the decedent that the entity knows about (45 C.F.R. § 164.510, 2024). This provision is permissive, not a right, and its scope is limited to what relates to her involvement.
The daughter was involved in his care throughout the admission. The provision therefore permits disclosure of information relevant to that involvement.
Her presence at the bedside opens the part of the record she lived through, not the whole history of the patient.
Search for a Contrary Preference
Before releasing anything, the record was searched for any objection the patient had expressed. No restriction request, no note limiting family communication and no advance directive language on confidentiality were found. His admission note records that he wanted his daughter "kept in the loop." The release is consistent with his known preferences.
Decision
Released: documentation from the April admission, from the emergency arrival on March 27 through the death note on April 10, including physician and nursing notes, medication administration records, laboratory and imaging results, and the discharge and death summaries. This is the period in which she was involved in his care, and it is the information relevant to that involvement.
Withheld: records of earlier encounters, including a 2023 outpatient behavioral health visit and his primary care records from before the admission. These are outside her involvement. She may obtain them through the executor, who as personal representative holds the right of access, or through a later request by an appointed administrator.
Implementation
The released records will be provided electronically through the secure portal within ten business days. A cover letter will explain that the release covers the admission period under the provision for family members involved in care, that earlier records may be requested by the executor, and how to reach the patient relations office if she has questions about his care. The letter does not interpret the record or comment on a possible claim. A copy of the cover letter and this memo will be filed with the request.
Ethical Note
The decision also reflects the AHIMA Code of Ethics, which asks health information professionals to respect the confidentiality of information and to apply judgment when the law leaves room for it (American Health Information Management Association, 2019). The daughter's grief and her need to understand his last days deserve a timely and generous answer within the limits of authority, and the cover letter is written with that in mind. Privacy protection for a decedent's information lasts fifty years after death under the Privacy Rule, so these records will remain protected long after this request is closed.
Release Log Entry
Date received: April 21. Requester: daughter, not personal representative. Authority: involvement in care before death. Scope: March 27 to April 10 admission. Withheld: earlier encounters, referred to executor. Contrary preference search: none found; admission note supports involvement. Decided by: privacy and release supervisor. Reviewed by: privacy officer, April 22. Delivered: secure portal.
References
American Health Information Management Association. (2019). AHIMA code of ethics. AHIMA.
45 C.F.R. § 164.502 (2024). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-C/part-164/subpart-E/section-164.502
45 C.F.R. § 164.510 (2024). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-C/part-164/subpart-E/section-164.510
HI570 Unit 3 instructions, in plain terms
The third unit commonly asks you to decide a release of information request and document your reasoning in memo form. Expect to summarize the request, analyze the requester's authority, determine scope, check for anything that would block disclosure, state the decision and describe implementation. Three pages plus a log entry is typical. Start with authority, because it determines everything else: is the requester a personal representative or acting under another provision? Draw scope from the words of the provision you rely on. Document any search for a patient's contrary wishes. Explain what is withheld and where the requester can go for it. A cover letter that is clear and kind, without interpreting the record, is often expected.
Inside the HI570 Unit 3 example
The memo summarizes the request, the requester's relationship and her stated purpose. Authority is analyzed in two parts: first, whether she is a personal representative, which she is not; second, whether the provision for relatives involved in care applies, which it does, within limits. The highlighted sentence states that her presence opens only the part of the record she lived through. A short section documents the search for a contrary preference and finds support for involvement. The decision releases the admission records and withholds earlier encounters, referring her to the executor. Implementation covers the portal, timing and the cover letter. An ethical note and a release log entry naming who decided and who reviewed close the memo.
HI570 Unit 3 rubric: what earns full points
Release decisions are usually scored on accuracy of the authority analysis, appropriate scope, documentation and communication. Authority analysis carries the largest share: graders check that the requester's status is correctly identified and that the provision relied on is applied accurately. Scope earns credit when it follows the provision's own limits. Documentation is rewarded when the memo shows the steps taken, such as a search for contrary preferences, and records who decided. Communication matters, so a cover letter that explains the partial release without interpreting the record adds points. Correct citations complete the rubric. Decisions that release the full record to any relative, or deny everything without considering the involvement provision, tend to lose points.
HI570 Unit 3 help from the desk
The most common mistake in this unit is treating any next of kin as a personal representative. Another is releasing the entire record under a provision that allows only what relates to the relative's involvement. Some students forget to check for the patient's own wishes before death. Decisions are often recorded without a reviewer or date. Cover letters sometimes comment on the care, which invites dispute. A spouse, an estate lawyer or the parent of a teenager would each change the authority analysis, so name the requester your prompt uses and the memo will be rebuilt around that status.
Get an HI570 Unit 3 example written to your instructions
Share the release scenario your section assigns, including who is asking, their relationship and any documents they supplied, plus the rubric and the memo format. A first sample, free and back within 24-48h, names the authority for each part of the decision, draws the scope and shows the log entry and signature. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More HI570 papers and MS in Health Informatics samples
- HI570 Unit 1: Discussion Board Argument
- HI570 Unit 2: Case Brief
- HI570 Unit 4: E-discovery Memo
- HI570 Unit 5: Ethical Dilemma Analysis
- HI570 Unit 6: Secondary Use Evaluation
- HI570 Unit 7: Liability Risk Analysis
- HI570 Unit 8: Seminar Reflection
- HI570 Unit 9: Policy Revision
- HI570 Unit 10: Legal and Ethical Position Paper
- HI560 Unit 3: Descriptive Statistics Report
- HI555 Unit 3: Front-End Process Map
- HI550 Unit 3: Org Structure Analysis
- HI501 Unit 3: Structured Data Memo
HI570 Unit 3 questions, answered
How long does HIPAA protect a deceased patient's information?
Fifty years after the date of death, under the definition of protected health information as amended in 2013. After that, the information is no longer protected health information under the Privacy Rule, though state law or organizational policy may still limit release. Within the fifty years, the personal representative generally holds the decedent's rights.
Who counts as a decedent's personal representative?
An executor, administrator or other person with authority under applicable law to act for the decedent or the estate. State law decides who that is when no executor is appointed, and some states give next of kin specific rights to records. The memo should cite the documents showing appointment, such as letters testamentary, rather than assume authority from family relationship.
What should the letter to the daughter say?
What is released, what is withheld and why, in plain language, and how the executor can request the full record for the estate. A sentence acknowledging her loss belongs there too. The letter should not suggest she has no right to anything, since part of the request was granted. Like the memo, it models coursework on the 2026 federal rule, not legal advice.
Where can I find a free HI570 Unit 3 sample paper?
The whole Unit 3 decision memo, with its log entry, is posted on this page, granting a daughter part of her father's record and explaining why.
Can a family member get a deceased patient's records without being the executor?
Sometimes, in part. A relative involved in the patient's care before death may receive information relevant to that involvement, unless the patient had objected.