Swimlanes by role carry this HI150 Unit 2 workflow map, which follows one inpatient record from the registration desk to the permanent file and names every handoff along the way. Searches like "hi 150 unit 2 assignment example", "hi150 unit 2 sample" and "hi150 unit 2 example" land here.
What a finished HI150 Unit 2 workflow map looks like
Drawn as swimlanes with a written walkthrough beside it, the map runs its lanes top to bottom: patient access, nursing and physicians, health information management, coding, and release of information. Each box is a verb and an object, such as search index or authenticate report, never a screen name. Decision diamonds appear where the path genuinely splits, the most important being whether the registration search finds an existing patient. Arrows crossing lanes are handoffs, and each carries a note about what travels, the identifier, the documentation, the abstract. Three boxes are shaded as error points: the index search, the discharge summary dictation, and the scanning of outside records. The walkthrough follows the diagram in order and keeps an actor named in every sentence, so the reader never loses track of who holds the record.
How a HI150 Unit 2 example is structured
Most sections ask for a diagram plus narrative, though some accept a table in place of drawn lanes. A short scope statement comes first, naming the encounter type and the start and end points. The diagram follows on its own page. The narrative then walks the lanes in time order: registration creates the identifier and the account, clinicians document during the stay, the record closes at discharge, analysis checks it for completeness, coding assigns and abstracts, and the chart reaches permanent status once deficiencies clear. A section on error points explains each shaded box, where the error is made, where it is usually discovered, and how far apart those two moments sit. A short close names the control that would move each discovery closer to the point of creation, with a role attached to each.
Scope and endpoints
Encounter type, first box and last box stated up front, so the map does not wander into billing or outpatient follow-up.
Lanes by role
Patient access, clinicians, analysis, coding and release, each lane holding only what that role actually does to the record.
Verbs in every box
Actions written as verb and object, search index or complete abstract, so the map describes work rather than software modules.
Three shaded error points
The index search, the dictated summary and outside scanning, each marked where the mistake happens rather than where someone finds it.
Controls at the source
For each error point, a check placed at that same step which would catch the problem before it travels downstream.
Where marks go in HI150 Unit 2
Tracing screens instead of people is the largest single loss, a sequence of module names with no one doing anything. Next comes a map without handoffs, where the record appears in each lane as if by magic. Blaming the desk that noticed a problem, coding or release, instead of the desk that caused it, usually registration or dictation, costs heavily because the fix then lands in the wrong place. Decision points drawn as ordinary boxes, or missing entirely, flatten the one branch that matters most, the index search. A narrative that contradicts its own diagram is marked down too. A map ending at discharge, before analysis and coding bring the record to permanent status, stops short of the part rubrics in this course most often examine.
Get a HI150 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Whatever workflow material came with Unit 2, a facility description, a screen sequence or nothing but the prompt, forward it alongside the instructions and rubric. Lanes, boxes and narrative are then drawn from that material, not from a generic hospital, and returned within 24-48h. A first sample costs you nothing.
HI150 Unit 2 questions, answered
What software should the diagram be drawn in?
Whatever your section accepts; the grading rests on content, not on the tool. The example uses simple lanes, boxes, diamonds and arrows that any drawing program or word processor can produce. Clarity matters more than polish: labels readable at normal size, arrows that do not cross needlessly, and a legend if shading marks the error points.
Should the map include coding and billing?
Coding, yes, because the record is not permanent until coding and abstracting finish and deficiencies clear. Billing usually falls outside the scope, and the example stops at the permanent file to keep the map on the record rather than on the claim. If your prompt defines different endpoints, the map follows the prompt instead.
How many boxes is too many?
When boxes describe keystrokes rather than tasks. The finished map holds roughly one box per meaningful action by a role, which keeps it readable on a single page. A map with dozens of boxes usually splits one task into screen steps, and the error points get lost among them, weakening the analysis the narrative depends on.