| Course | HD440 Health Education Program Assessment and Planning |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 5 |
| Paper type | Goal and objective set |
| Length | About 620 words, 5 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Health and Wellness |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HD440 Unit 5
From a Priority to Measurable Statements: A Unit 5 Goal and Objective Set for Safer Roads in a Composite Rural County
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
HD440: Health Education Program Assessment and Planning
Unit 5 Goal and Objective Set
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Ridley County, its baselines and targets are composite; the planning text and the reviews of interventions cited are real.
Goal
Fewer Ridley County residents and visitors will be killed or injured in crashes involving a driver who has been drinking.
How the Objectives Are Built
Objectives move from the program's activities, through the changes those activities are meant to cause, to the health outcome. Process objectives describe what the program will do. Impact objectives describe changes in behavior, policy or environment. Outcome objectives describe the change in health. Each objective names who is counted, what changes, by how much, by when and the record that will show it (Issel & Wells, 2018).
Outcome Objectives
1. By December 31, 2030, alcohol-involved crashes with injury or death in Ridley County will fall from [75] in 2021 through 2025 to no more than [52] in 2026 through 2030, a reduction of about 30 percent. Source: state crash reports.
2. By December 31, 2030, the share of driving deaths in Ridley County involving alcohol will fall below the state average. Source: county health rankings, five-year period ending 2030.
Impact Objectives
3. By December 31, 2027, the share of county residents aged 21 and older who report driving after having perhaps too much to drink in the past 30 days will fall from a baseline measured in 2026 by at least a quarter. Source: a county survey added to the hospital's community survey.
4. By December 31, 2027, at least [80] percent of people ordered to install an ignition interlock by the county court will have one installed within 30 days of the order, up from about [35] percent. Source: court and probation records.
5. By December 31, 2027, at least [10] of the county's [14] bars and taverns will have all serving staff trained in responsible beverage service. Source: training rosters.
6. By December 31, 2027, at least [60] percent of residents surveyed will recall the county's enforcement campaign. Source: county survey.
Process Objectives
7. Each year from 2026 through 2030, the sheriff's office and highway patrol will conduct at least [12] publicized sobriety checkpoints or saturation patrols in the high-crash areas identified in the assessment. Source: enforcement logs.
8. Each year, the campaign will run radio, social media and print messages announcing enforcement before every holiday weekend and during summer festivals. Source: media schedule and reports.
9. By June 30, 2026, a safe ride program will provide rides home from participating bars on Friday and Saturday nights. Source: ride logs.
Every process objective is there because an impact objective depends on it, and every impact objective is there because the evidence links it to fewer crashes, so the set can be read from bottom to top as a chain of reasons.
Why These Targets
The 30 percent reduction in crashes draws on reviews showing that sobriety checkpoints and mass media campaigns combined with enforcement reduce alcohol-involved crashes (Shults et al., 2001; Elder et al., 2004). Ignition interlock reviews show that offenders with interlocks installed are rearrested for impaired driving less often while the devices are in place (Elder et al., 2011), which is why objective 4 focuses on installation, not just orders.
Notes on Measurement
The outcome objectives rely on small numbers, so they are measured over five-year periods. The behavior objective needs a baseline that does not yet exist, so it is set for measurement in 2026. Court and training records are reliable, but survey items depend on honest answers.
References
Elder, R. W., Shults, R. A., Sleet, D. A., Nichols, J. L., Thompson, R. S., & Rajab, W. (2004). Effectiveness of mass media campaigns for reducing drinking and driving and alcohol-involved crashes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27(1), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.03.002
Elder, R. W., Voas, R., Beirness, D., Shults, R. A., Sleet, D. A., Nichols, J. L., & Compton, R. (2011). Effectiveness of ignition interlocks for preventing alcohol-impaired driving and alcohol-related crashes: A Community Guide systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(3), 362-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.012
Issel, L. M., & Wells, R. (2018). Health program planning and evaluation: A practical, systematic approach for community health (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Shults, R. A., Elder, R. W., Sleet, D. A., Nichols, J. L., Alao, M. O., Carande-Kulis, V. G., Zaza, S., Sosin, D. M., & Thompson, R. S. (2001). Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 21(4 Suppl.), 66-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00381-6
HD440 Unit 5 instructions, in plain terms
In the fifth unit, the priority picked earlier becomes one goal plus objectives written at three levels, process, impact and outcome. A couple of pages is common. Marks follow a goal stated broadly but clearly, objectives that each specify population, change, amount, deadline and data source, a logical link from process to impact to outcome, and targets justified by baselines or evidence. Many sections reward explaining how small numbers affect measurement and noting where a baseline must be collected first. Write each objective as one sentence with all five elements. Support the format with the planning text, and the targets with published effects of similar programs.
How the HD 440 Unit 5 example is put together
The set states the goal in one sentence, then explains how objectives move from activities to changes to health, citing a planning text. Two outcome objectives use crash reports and county rankings over five-year periods. Four impact objectives cover self-reported drinking and driving with a baseline still to be set, interlock installation within thirty days, trained serving staff and campaign recall. Three process objectives cover enforcement operations, holiday media and a ride program. The highlighted sentence explains that the set reads as a chain of reasons from bottom to top. A section justifies the targets with reviews of checkpoints, media and interlocks, and a measurement note closes it.
HD440 Unit 5 rubric: what earns full points
Goal and objective sets are generally judged on the completeness of each objective, the logic linking levels, the realism of targets and attention to measurement. Completeness usually carries the most marks, since an objective missing a deadline or a data source cannot be evaluated. Logic earns credit when each process objective serves an impact objective and each impact objective serves the outcome. Realism rewards targets tied to baselines and published effects. Measurement points go to choosing periods long enough for small numbers and naming baselines still to be collected. A goal that is broad but clear, rather than a restatement of an objective, is also expected. Showing the baseline beside each target lets a grader judge ambition at a glance.
Common HD440 Unit 5 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Students often write objectives that describe activities, such as hold checkpoints, without a number or deadline. Another frequent problem is outcome targets set without any evidence of how much change is possible. Some sets mix levels, placing a behavior change among process objectives. Others leave out where the figure will come from, which makes the objective unverifiable. Using single-year counts for rare events can make a program look like it failed or succeeded by chance. If your priority is different, perhaps teen vaping or prenatal care, share the baseline figures you have, and the objectives can be built level by level. A goal that is just a longer version of an outcome objective adds nothing.
Get an HD440 Unit 5 example written to your instructions
The priority your HD440 plan targets and the population it serves are the starting inputs, along with the Unit 5 prompt, the rubric and any baseline figures you hold. In 24-48h you will have a first custom sample, at no charge, with one goal, a full objective hierarchy, and a baseline and source beside every objective. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More HD440 papers and BS in Health and Wellness samples
- HD440 Unit 1: Community Priorities Discussion Post
- HD440 Unit 2: Data Source Review
- HD440 Unit 3: Community Assessment Summary
- HD440 Unit 4: Priority Setting Matrix
- HD440 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- HD440 Unit 7: Intervention Selection Paper
- HD440 Unit 8: Resource and Partner Plan
- HD440 Unit 9: Program Plan Draft
- HD440 Unit 10: Planning Document
- HD420 Unit 5: Access Barrier Study
HD440 Unit 5 questions, answered
What is the difference between impact and outcome objectives?
Outcome objectives describe the health result the program ultimately aims at, such as fewer fall injuries, and usually take years to show. Impact objectives describe the intermediate changes expected to produce it: knowledge, confidence, behavior or environment. Many health education textbooks use this sequence, though some sections use short-term, intermediate and long-term instead; follow your prompt's terms.
How ambitious should targets be?
Ambitious enough to matter and realistic enough to reach. Base targets on published effects of similar programs and on how many people the program can actually serve. A ten percent reduction in fall injuries across a county is plausible only if enough older adults participate, so check that process and outcome targets are consistent with each other.
Do objectives need a data source?
Strong sets name one for every objective, because an objective nobody can measure cannot be evaluated. Outcome objectives typically draw on surveillance or hospital data, impact objectives on participant surveys or validated scales, and process objectives on program records. Naming the source now also shows whether the measurement is feasible within the program's budget.
Where can I find a free HD440 Unit 5 sample paper?
This page presents the complete Unit 5 goal and objectives for cutting drinking-driver crashes in a composite county.
Why measure crash outcomes over five years?
Because a small county has few crashes each year, so single-year counts swing by chance. Five-year periods give a steadier picture of change.