HA545 Unit 9 Rural Residency Advocacy Plan Example

Reviewed by Chester Goodwin, MBA Health Policy Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This HA545 Unit 9 administrator advocacy plan gives a composite health system's vice president for government relations one legislative session to win state Medicaid payments for a new rural family medicine residency. It was written for Purdue Global HA 545, Health Policy, in the Master of Health Administration (MHA). The rural county has four family physicians for 31,000 residents, and Medicare funding will cover only part of the program's cost because of the residency caps set in 1997. The goal is narrow: a per-resident Medicaid payment for new rural family medicine residents in the next budget. Targets, messengers, channels and a timeline follow, tied to the state's budget calendar, along with answers to likely objections and the lobbying limits that apply to a nonprofit system.

CourseHA545 Health Policy
UnitUnit 9
Paper typeAdministrator advocacy plan
LengthAbout 880 words, 6 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramMaster of Health Administration (MHA)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HA545 Unit 9

1

Six Residents a Year for a County With Four Family Physicians: An Administrator Advocacy Plan for a Composite Health System's Vice President of Government Relations Seeking State Medicaid Payments for a New Rural Family Medicine Residency in One Legislative Session

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

HA545: Health Policy

Unit 9 Administrator Advocacy Plan

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The health system, the state, the officials and every figure are composite and bracketed for the writer's own data; federal rules described are real.

What this part is doingThe goal is stated narrowly and operationally first, because every later choice in the plan is tested against it.
2

Goal

In the next state budget, the Medicaid program adds graduate medical education payments of [$95,000] per resident per year for new family medicine residents training at least half their time in rural counties, starting with the system's program in [year].

Background

Medicare pays more toward residency training than any other public source, but most hospitals' funded positions were capped at their 1996 resident counts by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. A hospital that has never trained residents can build a cap during its first five years of a new program (42 C.F.R. § 413.79, 2024). Congress added [1,000] new Medicare-funded positions in 2020 law, with priority for rural and underserved areas, but competition for them is high. Most states also pay for residency training through Medicaid, at their own choice and in their own amounts. This state does not, which leaves new rural programs short of funds. Research has long found that physicians tend to practice near where they completed residency (Seifer et al., 1995), so where residents train shapes where physicians stay.

The System's Evidence

The rural county has [four] family physicians for [31,000] residents. The system's urban internal medicine program sees [41] percent of graduates practice within [100] miles. At full size, with [18] residents, the rural program's annual budget comes to roughly [$2.9] million; expected Medicare funding covers about [$1.2] million once the cap is built. The state payment would close most of the gap: [18] residents at [$95,000] is [$1.71] million, about [$0.6] million of it state money after the federal Medicaid match. The request is small in the state budget and decisive for whether the program opens at all.

Targets

Medicaid director: decides how GME payments would be structured; can propose them in the agency's budget request. Timing: the agency's request is due in [September]. Chair of the House appropriations health subcommittee: controls the budget line. Timing: hearings in [February]. Governor's health policy adviser: shapes the governor's budget. Timing: [November]. State rural health association: an ally, with members in every rural district.

Messengers

For the Medicaid director: the system's chief medical officer, who can speak to program design and federal matching. For the subcommittee chair: a resident who grew up in a rural county, and the county's hospital board chair, who lives in the chair's district. For the governor's adviser: the rural hospital's chief executive with the rural health association director. Messengers are chosen for credibility with each target, not by rank.

What this part is doingMatching each messenger to one target uses the system's people where they carry the most weight.
3

Channels

Meetings with each target; testimony at the budget hearing; a two-page brief; a letter of support from [12] county commissions; local news coverage of the rural physician shortage; and formal comments if the Medicaid agency proposes payment rules.

Anticipated Objections and Answers

Why should the state pay for training that Medicare is supposed to fund? Because Medicare's caps leave new programs short, and most states already supplement Medicare through Medicaid; this state would be catching up, not leading. Will residents stay? Not all will, but rural training tracks in other states retain a meaningful share of graduates nearby, and the system will report where each graduate practices. Why one system's program? The payment would be open to any new rural family medicine residency that meets the criteria, so the request is framed as a state program, with the system's residency as the first user. Will the cost grow? The payment is capped per resident and limited to rural training, so growth follows only new rural programs.

Timeline

[August]: brief written; meeting with the Medicaid director before the agency's request. [October]: rural health association adopts the issue. [November]: meeting with the governor's adviser. [January]: county letters collected; meetings with subcommittee members. [February]: testimony at the budget hearing. [April]: final budget; follow-up with the agency on payment rules.

Limits on Lobbying

As a nonprofit under Section 501(c)(3), the system may lobby only as an insubstantial part of its activities (26 U.S.C. § 501, 2024). It will track staff time and costs spent on legislative lobbying and keep them well within that limit. Comments to the Medicaid agency on how to implement payments, and educational briefings, are generally treated differently from legislative lobbying, but the system's counsel will review all materials. No system funds will go to political campaigns.

Measures of Progress

What this part is doingProgress is measured at each decision point in the budget calendar, so the plan shows early whether it is working.
4

The Medicaid director's request includes GME payments; the governor's budget includes them; the subcommittee adopts them; the final budget funds them; the agency issues payment rules by [date].

Risks

Budget pressure could push the payment out of the final budget. Fallback: a one-time start-up grant for the program's first [two] years, with a study of permanent funding.

Conclusion

A narrow goal, targeted at the officials who control one budget line and carried by people they trust, gives the system its best chance to open the program on time.

5

References

42 C.F.R. § 413.79 (2024). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-42/section-413.79

Seifer, S. D., Vranizan, K., & Grumbach, K. (1995). Graduate medical education and physician practice location: Implications for physician workforce policy. JAMA, 274(9), 685-691. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530090017015

26 U.S.C. § 501 (2024). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/501

Reading the HA 545 Unit 9 instructions

Unit 9 in HA 545 usually asks students to write an advocacy plan for a health care administrator seeking a specific policy change. Instructions commonly require a goal statement, policy background, targets with what each controls, supporting evidence, messengers, channels, a schedule and a note on the rules that restrict lobbying by nonprofits. State a narrow, operational goal, since every later choice is tested against it. Name officials by role and say what each one decides and when. Use the organization's own data as evidence, because it shows what officials rarely see. Choose messengers for credibility with each target rather than by rank. Tie the timeline to the decision calendar. Cite federal rules on lobbying by nonprofits in APA style, and plan a fallback if the main ask fails.

How the HA 545 Unit 9 example is put together

The sample states its goal first, flagged by a margin note. Background explains Medicare residency caps, the cap-building window for new teaching hospitals and Medicaid's optional role, with research linking training location to practice location. The system's evidence shows the funding gap, and a highlighted line says the ask is small for the state but decisive for the program. Four targets are named with their timing. Messengers are matched to targets, with a margin note on why. Channels, answers to four likely objections and a month-by-month timeline follow. A section on lobbying limits explains the rules for a 501(c)(3) system. Measures of progress, flagged by a third note, a fallback and a conclusion complete the plan.

Where the points sit in the HA545 Unit 9 rubric

HA 545 advocacy plan rubrics generally award points for a clear goal, accurate background, well-chosen targets, persuasive evidence, credible messengers, appropriate channels, a realistic timeline, attention to legal limits, sources and presentation. Goal points go to a specific, achievable change. Target points reward naming who decides and when. Evidence points depend on data that speak to the target's concerns. Messenger points go to choices based on credibility. Timeline points require alignment with the decision calendar. Legal points reward accurate treatment of lobbying limits. Plans that anticipate objections and prepare answers before meetings tend to receive the highest grades, because officials almost always raise them.

HA545 Unit 9 help: mistakes that cost points

Advocacy plans often lose points by stating a broad goal, such as improving rural health, that no official can grant. Others name targets without saying what each controls, or send the chief executive to every meeting. Many ignore the budget calendar or the limits on nonprofit lobbying. Write a goal an official can say yes to. Name each target, what they decide and when. Use your organization's own figures to show the problem. Match each messenger to one target. Plan channels and a timeline around real deadlines. Prepare answers to the objections you will hear. Explain the lobbying rules that apply and how you will stay within them, and set a fallback ask in case the budget cannot carry the main one.

Get an HA545 Unit 9 example written to your instructions

Advocacy prompts in Unit 9 often range from a legislative bill to an agency rule to an internal board decision. Whatever yours targets, forward it with the rubric and your role, and the plan will set one winnable goal, name who decides, and stay inside the limits that apply to your organization. First sample free; 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More HA545 papers and MHA samples

HA545 Unit 9 questions, answered

Where can I find a free HA545 Unit 9 sample paper?

The complete HA545 Unit 9 administrator advocacy plan is here, seeking state Medicaid payments for a composite system's new rural family medicine residency.

Why does Medicare not fully fund new residencies?

Most hospitals' Medicare-funded positions were capped at 1996 levels, and new slots are limited.

Can a nonprofit hospital lobby?

Yes, but under Section 501(c)(3) only as an insubstantial part of its activities.

Why match messengers to targets?

Officials listen most to people they find credible, such as constituents or clinicians, not necessarily executives.

How long is the HA545 Unit 9 plan?

About five pages in plan format with a timeline.