| Course | HA530 Human Resources for Health Care Managers |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 5 |
| Paper type | Training program design |
| Length | About 850 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | Master of Health Administration (MHA) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HA530 Unit 5
Ninety-Six of One Hundred Fifty-One in Two Departments: A Training Program Design for Sharps Injury Prevention at a Composite Health System, Tiered by Exposure, Built With Frontline Input and Evaluated at Four Levels
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
HA530: Human Resources for Health Care Managers
Unit 5 Training Program Design
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The system, the injury counts and the program are composite and bracketed; the design is a course model and does not replace a facility's exposure control plan.
The Need
Of [151] reported sharps injuries: operating rooms [58], emergency departments [38], inpatient units [33], laboratories and phlebotomy [14], other [8]. Most involved suture needles in surgery, hollow-bore needles during intravenous starts in the emergency department and devices whose safety features were not activated. An estimated [30] to [50] percent of injuries go unreported, so the true number is higher.
Requirements
The federal bloodborne pathogens standard requires employers to provide training at initial assignment and at least annually to employees with occupational exposure, to use safer medical devices where appropriate and to involve frontline employees in identifying and evaluating those devices (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1030, 2024). Training must be interactive, with an opportunity for questions answered by a knowledgeable person.
Learning Objectives
By the end of training, participants will be able to:
1. Activate the safety feature on each device used in their unit, every time.
2. Use a neutral zone or hands-free passing technique in the operating room.
3. Dispose of sharps immediately in a container within reach.
4. Report every injury and follow the post-exposure process within [two] hours.
Tier 1: All Clinical Staff
A [20]-minute interactive e-learning module meeting the annual requirement, with unit-specific device videos and a live question session each month. Audience: about [6,800] employees.
Tier 2: High-Exposure Units
A [90]-minute hands-on session for operating room and emergency department staff, using the devices they actually handle, practicing activation, neutral zone passing and safe disposal under time pressure. Audience: about [640] staff. The highest-risk staff need to practice with their own devices under realistic pressure, because knowing the rule is rarely the problem; activating it in a rush is.
Tier 3: Peer Champions
One nurse or technologist per shift in each high-exposure unit trained to coach colleagues, check sharps container placement and collect feedback on devices. Audience: about [40] champions.
Frontline Input on Devices
Champions and staff will evaluate two safety-engineered intravenous catheters and blunt suture needles for selected procedures, as federal rules require and as program guidance recommends (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008).
Why Not Train Everyone the Same Way
A single annual module for all [6,800] staff would meet the minimum requirement but would treat a nurse who rarely uses a needle the same as a scrub technologist who handles dozens of sharps every case. Injury data show where practice under pressure matters. Tiering also respects staff time: most employees spend twenty minutes, and the highest-risk staff spend the time that will actually change their practice.
Teaching Methods
Tier 2 uses short demonstrations followed by timed practice at stations that mimic a busy trauma bay and an operating room setup. Each participant activates every device used on their unit at least five times and practices passing instruments through a neutral zone with a partner. Instructors give immediate feedback, and participants who cannot activate a device correctly repeat the station.
Reporting Culture
Training will also address why injuries go unreported: staff say reporting takes too long and that they fear being blamed. The program will introduce a one-page report and a single phone number answered at all hours, and leaders will thank staff who report rather than question them.
Evaluation at Four Levels
The Kirkpatricks describe four levels of evidence, from how participants felt about training to what it changed in the organization (Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2016).
1. Reaction: a short survey after each session.
2. Learning: a skills check on device activation in Tier 2.
3. Behavior: champion observation of [20] procedures a month for safety feature activation and neutral zone use.
4. Results: sharps injury rate per [100] full-time equivalents in each unit, with a target of [30] percent fewer injuries in high-exposure units within one year.
Who Runs the Program
Employee health owns the program and the injury data; the education department builds the module; surgical services and emergency leaders co-lead Tier 2 sessions in their departments.
Timeline
Months 1 and 2: device evaluation and module build. Month 3: champion training. Months 4 to 6: Tier 2 sessions. Ongoing: Tier 1 annually.
Costs
Module development: [$18,000]. Tier 2 paid time: about [960] hours. Champion time: [two] hours a month each. Devices: incremental cost of safety-engineered alternatives, about [$42,000] a year.
Risks
Underreporting may rise at first as reporting improves; the evaluation will track reported injuries alongside observed behavior. Surgeons may resist neutral zone passing; the surgical services medical director will co-lead Tier 2 in the operating rooms.
Conclusion
Concentrating training where injuries occur, involving frontline staff in device choices and evaluating at every level gives the system a program that meets federal requirements and targets the risk itself.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). Workbook for designing, implementing, and evaluating a sharps injury prevention program. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
29 C.F.R. § 1910.1030 (2024). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/section-1910.1030
Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016). Kirkpatrick's four levels of training evaluation. ATD Press.
Reading the HA 530 Unit 5 instructions
Unit 5 commonly asks students to design a training program for health care employees, based on a needs assessment. Instructions usually require identifying the need with data, stating learning objectives, choosing methods and audiences, meeting any regulatory requirements, planning evaluation and estimating costs. Many courses use Kirkpatrick's four levels for evaluation. Support the design with the governing regulation, training evaluation sources and program guidance cited in APA format; bracket every composite count and name no real hospital. Show how many staff each tier reaches and how long each session runs. Tiering training by exposure or risk, rather than giving everyone the same course, shows that the design follows the data and respects employees' time.
How the HA 530 Unit 5 example is put together
The sample states the need with injury counts by department, with a margin note on starting where injuries occur. Federal bloodborne pathogens requirements are cited. Four learning objectives follow, then three tiers, and the highlighted sentence explains why high-risk staff need to practice with their own devices. Frontline input on devices cites federal program guidance, with a margin note. Sections explain why one course for all would fall short, describe teaching methods and address reporting culture. Evaluation at four levels cites the Kirkpatricks. Program owners in employee health and education, a timeline with a third note, costs in time and devices, risks such as surgeon resistance and a conclusion close the design.
Reading the HA530 Unit 5 grading rubric
Training design rubrics in HA 530 tend to award points for a needs assessment, clear objectives, appropriate methods, targeted audiences, regulatory compliance, an evaluation plan, costs and citations. Needs points depend on data showing where the problem is. Objective points go to observable, measurable outcomes. Method points reward hands-on practice where skills matter. Audience points require tailoring to risk. Compliance points go to meeting specific requirements. Evaluation points need measures at several levels, including results. Cost points require time and money estimates. Designs that address why problems go unreported, not only how to prevent them, often earn the highest marks, because a training program can only be judged if injuries are reported honestly.
HA530 Unit 5 help from the desk
Training designs often lose points by proposing one annual course for everyone without using data to target it. Another gap is objectives like understand sharps safety, which cannot be measured. Some designs evaluate only whether participants liked the training. Others ignore regulatory requirements or frontline involvement. Start with data, write objectives as observable behaviors, tier audiences by risk, practice skills hands-on and evaluate reaction, learning, behavior and results. Then name owners, costs and a timeline, and explain how champions keep the change going after sessions end. Including a plan to improve reporting is important, since better reporting may raise injury counts at first, and leaders should expect that before judging the program.
Get an HA530 Unit 5 example written to your instructions
Training needs differ by setting, so describe the one in your Unit 5 assignment, or a performance problem you have seen firsthand, and add the rubric plus any incident counts in the case. Back within 24-48h: a needs analysis, behavioral objectives, tiers matched to exposure, a costed schedule and a four-level evaluation plan. The first request costs nothing. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More HA530 papers and MHA samples
- HA530 Unit 1: HR Shared Services Discussion Post
- HA530 Unit 2: Accommodation Requests Law Case
- HA530 Unit 3: Virtual Nurse Job Analysis
- HA530 Unit 4: Nurse Residency Recruitment Plan
- HA530 Unit 6: Performance Appraisal Documentation
- HA530 Unit 7: Compensation Analysis
- HA530 Unit 8: Labor Relations Case
- HA530 Unit 9: Retention Strategy Paper
- HA530 Unit 10: Human Resources Capstone Deliverable
- HA520 Unit 5: Hospital Payer Mix Analysis
- HA540 Unit 5:
- HA515 Unit 5: Home Health Strategic Direction Paper
- HA510 Unit 5: Transfer Center Team Development Case
HA530 Unit 5 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HA530 Unit 5 sample paper?
The complete HA530 Unit 5 training program design is shown on this page, tiering sharps injury prevention training by exposure at a composite health system, with three sources. Your own training need can be designed the same way.
What does the bloodborne pathogens standard require for training?
Training at initial assignment and at least annually for employees with occupational exposure, with an opportunity for questions.
How is the HA530 Unit 5 program evaluated?
Through participant surveys, a hands-on skills check, monthly observation of device use and the change in injury rates by unit.
Why tier training by exposure?
To focus hands-on practice on the staff most likely to be injured while meeting basic requirements for everyone efficiently.
How long is the HA530 Unit 5 design?
About five pages with objectives, three tiers, evaluation and costs.