GF591 Unit 7 Long Term Care Cost and Policy Analysis Example

Reviewed by Chester Goodwin, MBA Individual Insurance Planning Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This GF591 Unit 7 long-term care analysis prices care in the dollars of the year it begins and measures a policy against that cost. Purdue Global GF 591, Individual Insurance Planning, asks MS in Finance students to project both cost and benefit to the same future year. For a composite couple aged 58 and 61, a three-year episode for her starting at 83, a year of home care then two of assisted living, is projected at $578,764 with care costs rising 4 percent a year. A policy paying $5,000 a month today, growing 3 percent, would pay about $345,473 after a 90-day wait, leaving $233,291 to income, a reserve and home equity.

CourseGF591 Individual Insurance Planning
UnitUnit 7
Paper typeLong-term care analysis
LengthAbout 910 words, 6 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramMS in Finance
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for GF591 Unit 7

1

Priced in the Year It Happens: A Unit 7 Long-Term Care Analysis for a Couple in Their Late Fifties

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

GF591: Individual Insurance Planning

Unit 7 Long-Term Care Analysis

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The couple, the care episode, the policy and the premiums are composite and illustrative; cost data and research cited are real.

What this part is doingStating the projected cost, the policy's share and the remainder in the lead frames the analysis around the gap.
2

Assumptions

1. Today's costs. Assisted living at $5,900 a month and home care at $33 an hour, both close to recent national medians (Genworth Financial, 2024). Forty-four hours of home care a week costs about $6,292 a month.

2. Care inflation. 4 percent a year, set above general inflation because care costs have tended to rise faster than prices overall.

3. Timing. She is 58 now. The episode modeled begins at her 83rd birthday, 25 years from now.

4. Episode. One year of home care followed by two years in assisted living, a common path when needs grow gradually.

5. Medicare. The federal program for retirees covers short skilled stays after a hospital admission but not years of personal assistance, so it contributes nothing here (Brown & Finkelstein, 2011).

Cost Projection

At 4 percent a year for 25 years, each dollar of today's cost becomes about $2.67.

1. Home care rises from $6,292 a month to about $16,773.

2. Assisted living rises from $5,900 a month to about $15,728.

The episode, priced at those age-83 rates:

1. Twelve months of home care: about $201,276.

2. Twenty-four months of assisted living: about $377,472.

3. Total: about $578,764.

The projection holds these rates flat across the three years for simplicity; with costs still rising during the episode, the total would be somewhat higher.

The Policy Schedule

The proposed policy pays up to $5,000 a month today, from a total benefit pool of $180,000, a waiting period of ninety days before benefits begin, and benefits that grow 3 percent a year, compounded.

Converting the policy to the same future year is the step where most analyses go wrong. At 3 percent compounded for 25 years, each dollar of benefit grows to about $2.09.

1. The monthly maximum grows from $5,000 to about $10,469.

2. The pool grows from $180,000 to about $376,880.

The policy's benefit grows at 3 percent while care costs are assumed to grow at 4 percent, so a policy that covers about 79 percent of a month's home care today would cover only about 62 percent of it at 83.

What this part is doingThe highlighted sentence shows why both sides must be projected to the same year, which is the key insight of the analysis.
3

Applying the Policy to the Episode

1. Elimination period. The first three months are paid by the family: three months of home care at about $16,773, or about $50,320.

2. Covered months. For the remaining 33 months, the policy pays its maximum of $10,469 a month, since actual costs exceed it throughout. That totals about $345,473.

3. Pool check. $345,473 is within the $376,880 pool, so the pool is not exhausted during this episode.

4. Remaining cost. About $233,291, including the elimination period.

Who Pays the Remainder

Payers are listed in the order they would be drawn.

1. Income. By 83, the couple's pensions and Social Security will continue. Some of that income can go to care, but the healthy spouse still needs to live on it.

2. A dedicated reserve. The plan sets aside a care reserve within their investment accounts, targeting about $150,000 in today's terms by the time she is 80.

3. Home equity. If she moves to assisted living and he stays at home, equity is less accessible. If both move, the house can be sold.

4. Medicaid as a last resort. Medicaid pays for long-term care only after most assets have been spent down. Research shows that Medicaid's role as a secondary payer reduces the value of private policies for many households, since part of what a policy pays would otherwise have been paid by Medicaid (Brown & Finkelstein, 2008). For this couple, with substantial assets, that effect is smaller.

Why Model Her Care and Not His

The analysis models her care because she is younger and, as a woman, more likely to live long enough to need extended care, and because when he needs care first she is likely to provide much of it at home. His episode, if it came, would probably be shorter and partly covered by her help. Both spouses would be insured under the proposal, and a shared pool rider was considered, which lets either spouse draw on the other's unused benefits. It adds cost but protects against the case in which one spouse needs far more than the other.

Premium Risk

The illustrative premium is about $6,200 a year for both spouses. That premium is not guaranteed. Long-term care contracts allow the insurer to raise premiums for a whole class of policyholders with state approval, and many have done so. If the premium rose 50 percent at age 70, the couple would face a choice between paying more, reducing benefits or letting the policy lapse after paying for years.

What this part is doingTreating premium increases as a risk in their own right shows the analysis looks at the contract over its whole life.
4

Conclusion

The policy would pay about 60 percent of the modeled episode. That makes it valuable protection against a long, expensive care need, but not a complete solution. The couple should decide whether a reserve and home equity can carry the rest, and whether they are comfortable with the risk of future premium increases. A policy with 5 percent inflation protection would close more of the gap at a higher premium and should be quoted before they decide.

5

References

Brown, J. R., & Finkelstein, A. (2008). The interaction of public and private insurance: Medicaid and the long-term care insurance market. American Economic Review, 98(3), 1083-1102. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.3.1083

Brown, J. R., & Finkelstein, A. (2011). Insuring long-term care in the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 119-142. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.4.119

Genworth Financial. (2024). Cost of care survey 2024.

The Purdue Global GF591 Unit 7 instructions

GF591's seventh unit asks whether a long-term care policy fits a household's likely costs. Start with assumptions and their sources: today's costs by type of care, a care inflation rate set separately from general inflation, the age when care begins and the shape of the episode. Note what public programs do not pay. Project costs to the year care begins and assemble the episode month by month by type of care. Convert the policy's monthly benefit and pool to the same future year using its inflation option, then apply the elimination period in months of actual cost. Check whether the pool lasts. List who pays the remainder in the order they would be drawn. Discuss premium risk, since many contracts allow class-wide increases. Close with what the policy does and does not achieve. Cite cost surveys and research in APA 7.

How this GF591 Unit 7 example is built

Five assumptions open the analysis, with today's assisted living and home care costs drawn from the Genworth survey and Medicare's limits noted from Brown and Finkelstein. Projections lift home care to about $16,773 a month and assisted living to $15,728 at age 83, and the episode totals $578,764. The policy schedule grows the $5,000 benefit to $10,469 and the $180,000 pool to $376,880, and the highlighted sentence shows coverage falling from 79 to 62 percent of a month's home care. The policy is applied: $50,320 during the wait and $345,473 over 33 months. Payers are listed from income to reserve, home equity and Medicaid, citing Brown and Finkelstein on Medicaid's effect. A section explains modeling her care, and premium risk closes before a conclusion.

Where the points sit in the GF591 Unit 7 rubric

The GF591 long-term care rubric awards its first points for sourced assumptions, especially a care inflation rate set apart from general inflation. Graders then reward projecting both the cost and the policy benefit to the same future year, which is where most errors are caught. Applying the elimination period in months of actual cost and checking whether the pool lasts show careful use of the contract. Instructors in the MS in Finance program value a payer list in the order money would be drawn, with the at-home spouse's needs respected and Medicaid treated as a last resort. Premium increase risk deserves its own discussion. The Genworth survey for costs and the two Brown and Finkelstein studies for public and private coverage give the analysis its evidence.

Common GF591 Unit 7 mistakes, and how to avoid them

GF591 Unit 7 analyses often compare today's policy benefit with today's care cost, which hides the gap that inflation opens over decades. Others grow costs and benefits at the same rate without checking the policy's actual inflation option. Elimination periods are converted to days but never priced. The pool is assumed to last without checking. Medicare is counted as paying for custodial care. The at-home spouse disappears from the budget. Premium increases are ignored. If your case gives different ages, care settings or policy designs, such as a hybrid life policy, keep the order: sourced assumptions, projected costs by care type, the episode month by month, policy converted to the same year, waiting period priced, pool checked, payers in order and premium risk.

Get a GF591 Unit 7 example written to your instructions

Share the ages, assets, income sources and any policy illustration from the GF591 Unit 7 case, along with the rubric. A custom analysis projects care costs to the year care is likely, converts the benefit and pool to that same year, applies the waiting period and names who pays the remainder. First custom sample free, within 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More GF591 papers and MS in Finance samples

GF591 Unit 7 questions, answered

Should a hybrid life and long-term care policy be compared?

If the prompt allows it, a paragraph on a hybrid policy is useful, since it trades a higher upfront cost for protection against premium increases and a death benefit if care is never needed. The sample keeps the traditional policy as its main case and mentions the hybrid only as an alternative worth pricing later in the term.

How is the spouse at home treated?

As a claimant on the same income. When one spouse enters care, the other still needs housing and living expenses, so the analysis cannot send all household income to care. The sample protects the at-home spouse's budget first and draws on income only above it, which is why the reserve and home equity carry so much of the remainder.

Where can I find a free GF591 Unit 7 sample paper?

This page carries a full GF591 Unit 7 long-term care analysis projecting a three-year care episode to age 83, applying a policy with 3 percent inflation growth, listing payers for the remainder and citing APA 7 references.

Why does the policy cover less of the cost over time?

Its benefits grow 3 percent a year while care costs are assumed to grow 4 percent. A benefit that covers about 79 percent of a month's home care today covers only about 62 percent of it by age 83.

Where do the current care costs come from?

From a national cost of care survey published by Genworth for 2024, which reports assisted living near $5,900 a month and home care near $33 an hour. Regional costs can differ widely, so a case's own figures should replace them.