GF520 · Unit 2

GF520 Unit 2 time value problem set example

Corporate Finance Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Valuation mechanics come back quickly in GF520, and the Unit 2 set is often paced for readers who met them in an earlier course. This worked example solves eight time value problems, each placed on a timeline before any equation is chosen, moving from a single discounted sum through an amortizing loan to a share priced as a growing perpetuity.

What this page holds

Each of eight problems in this GF520 Unit 2 time value set sits on its own timeline, worked to the cent with cash flow signs and compounding stated. Searches like "gf 520 unit 2 assignment example", "gf520 unit 2 sample" and "gf520 unit 2 example" land here.

What a finished GF520 Unit 2 time value problem set looks like

Eight numbered problems, grouped by the shape of the cash flows. Single sums come first: 50,000 dollars due in six years at 7 percent is worth 33,317.11 today. Level streams follow, where 12,000 a year for eight years at 6 percent has a present value of 74,517.53 and 400 dollars a month for twenty-five years at 7 percent grows to 324,028.68. A rate conversion restates 8 percent compounded monthly as an effective 8.30 percent. A 250,000-dollar loan over five years at 6.5 percent carries a monthly payment of 4,891.54 and 43,492.22 of total interest. A share paying 2.10 next year and growing 3 percent is worth 35.00 at a 9 percent required return. The last problem prices an uneven four-year stream against a 180,000 outlay and finds a net present value of 3,860.72.

How a GF520 Unit 2 example is structured

Every problem follows the same five lines, so a grader can move through the set quickly. A timeline comes first, with each cash flow placed at its period and signed, outflows negative, so the direction of money is settled before any arithmetic. The problem type is named next, lump sum, ordinary annuity, annuity due or perpetuity, with a clause saying why that type fits. An equation in general form sits beneath, then the same equation carrying the problem's numbers, then the answer to the cent with its unit. Calculator entries or a spreadsheet function appear in a smaller line as a check. Ordering runs from simple to layered, so the uneven stream at the end reuses the discounting from problem one. The set ends by recording the conventions held throughout and flagging the one problem where payments arrive at the start of each period.

A timeline before any equation

Each problem is drawn as periods and signed amounts first, which settles whether a payment falls at time zero or time one before a formula is chosen.

The type named and justified

Lump sum, annuity, annuity due or growing perpetuity is stated for every problem, with a clause tying the choice to the facts in the prompt.

Monthly flows, monthly rates

The loan and the savings stream divide the annual rate by twelve and count periods in months, the conversion most sets are checked on first.

First rows of the loan schedule

Three months of the amortization table show interest shrinking and principal growing inside a fixed 4,891.54 payment, confirming the payment before totals are reported.

Keystrokes kept as a check

Calculator entries sit in a smaller line under each answer, so the equation remains the method on the page and the device only confirms it.

Where marks go in GF520 Unit 2

Time value sets in a graduate course are marked on method as much as on the final figure, and most lost credit traces to a period count or a sign. Monthly payments discounted at an annual rate, or a sixty-month loan treated as five periods, produce answers that look plausible and miss by thousands. Annuity due problems solved as ordinary annuities lose a full period of interest. A growing perpetuity priced with the current dividend instead of next year's overstates value. Bare answers without a timeline or equation earn little method credit, because a grader cannot see where a slip occurred. Later units assume these mechanics, so a set that states its conventions once and then holds them reads as ready for the cost of capital work ahead.

Get a GF520 Unit 2 example written to your instructions

Attach the GF520 Unit 2 problems exactly as assigned, plus the rubric and any instruction about showing work by hand or by spreadsheet. Each one is solved on its own timeline with the equation, the substituted values and a check line beneath. There is no fee for the first custom sample, which normally returns within 24-48h.

GF520 Unit 2 questions, answered

What separates an ordinary annuity from an annuity due?

Timing. An ordinary annuity pays at the end of each period and an annuity due pays at the start, so every payment in the due version earns one extra period of interest. Rent and lease payments usually fall at the start, loan payments at the end. The sample marks each problem's convention on its timeline, and the annuity due answer equals the ordinary result multiplied by one plus the rate.

Why draw a timeline for a simple problem?

Because most time value errors are counting errors, not arithmetic ones. Placing each cash flow at its period shows whether a payment falls at time zero or time one and how many periods separate it from today. Graders can also follow a timeline in seconds, so when a figure is off they can often award method credit, which a bare answer cannot receive.

My problems use different numbers. Does that matter?

Not to the method. The rate, amount and number of periods change, but the sample's sequence does not: flows placed, type named, equation written, values substituted, answer checked. The custom version is solved on the numbers your instructor assigned rather than the illustrative figures shown here, and it follows whatever convention your section specifies for compounding, payment timing and rounding.