| Course | GB701 Business Statistics |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 2 |
| Paper type | Descriptive summary exercise |
| Length | About 880 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | MBA |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for GB701 Unit 2
Two Populations in One Histogram: A Unit 2 Descriptive Summary of Quote-to-Order Time
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
GB701: Business Statistics
Unit 2 Descriptive Summary Exercise
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The distributor, its accounts and every figure are composite and illustrative; the methods and sources cited are real.
The Variable
Quote-to-order time is each account's average number of days from the date a quote is issued to the date the customer's purchase order is received, across all quotes that converted to orders in the twelve months ending in June. Quotes that never converted are excluded, since they have no order date; their count is recorded separately. The data come from the quoting system's conversion report, matched to the customer master file for order type. An account is classed as special-order if more than half of its quoted lines in the year were items not held in stock.
Defining the variable this precisely matters because "days to order" could mean several things: days from the first quote in a revision series or from the last, days to the first order or to the final one, calendar days or business days. This summary uses calendar days from the final revised quote to the purchase order. Tukey (1977) urged analysts to settle what a number measures before computing anything from it, and every figure below inherits these choices.
Table 1: Summary for All Accounts
Count, 1,240. Mean, 8.55 days. Five percent trimmed mean, 8.1. Median, 7.5. Standard deviation, 5.01. Interquartile range, 5.6, from a first quartile of 5.0 to a third quartile of 10.6. Skewness, 1.62. Excess kurtosis, 3.89. Minimum, 1.5. Maximum, 35.9.
Why the Median Leads
The distribution is right-skewed: most accounts convert within about two weeks, and a long tail stretches past a month. Skewness of 1.62 and excess kurtosis of 3.89 confirm what the histogram shows. In a skewed distribution the mean is pulled toward the tail, here about a day above the median, so the median better represents the typical account. The interquartile range, which ignores the tails, describes the spread of the middle half more honestly than the standard deviation, which the tail inflates. The summary therefore reports the median and interquartile range first, with the mean and standard deviation alongside for readers who need them for later calculations.
What the Trimmed Mean Adds
The 5 percent trimmed mean, 8.1 days, removes the fastest and slowest 5 percent of accounts before averaging. It sits between the mean and the median, which suggests the tail explains much of the distance between them, though not all of it. Wilcox (2017) recommends trimmed means for skewed business and behavioral data because they are less sensitive to extreme values while using more of the data than the median does.
Figure 1: Panels Instead of a Pooled Chart
The sales team's standard chart is a single histogram of all accounts in five-day bins. It shows one lump with a long right tail, and readers tend to see one population with some slow outliers.
Figure 1 replaces it with two histograms stacked on a shared axis, one for the 891 stock-order accounts and one for the 349 special-order accounts, both in two-day bins. The stock panel peaks around five to seven days and falls off quickly. The special-order panel is flatter and centered near ten days, with most of the long tail. Shown separately, the "slow outliers" turn out to be the bulk of a different population.
The slow accounts were not outliers from one distribution; they were the middle of a second one.
Figure 2: Box Plots Side by Side
Figure 2 places box plots for the two groups next to each other. The boxes barely overlap: the stock group's third quartile, 9.2 days, sits close to the special-order group's first quartile, 7.7 days. Cleveland (1993) argues that displays should be chosen so that the comparisons a reader needs to make are easy to see, and the side-by-side box plots make the difference between the groups visible in seconds.
Table 2: Summary by Order Type
Stock-order accounts, 891. Mean 7.28 days, standard deviation 3.84, median 6.4, interquartile range 4.7 (4.5 to 9.2), maximum 28.6, skewness 1.34.
Special-order accounts, 349. Mean 11.80 days, standard deviation 6.06, median 10.5, interquartile range 7.2 (7.7 to 14.9), maximum 35.9, skewness 1.28.
The special-order group is both slower and more variable. Its interquartile range is about half again as wide as the stock group's.
What the Display Changes for Readers
The split display changes what the sales team will discuss. With the pooled chart, conversations about slow accounts focused on individual customers who seemed unusually hesitant. With the panels, the conversation shifts to why special-order quotes take longer as a group, which points toward lead times from manufacturers, engineering approvals at the customer's site and the number of revisions a special-order quote goes through.
Limits Stated Plainly
Three limits apply. Averaging each account's quotes hides variation within accounts, and an account with many quotes counts the same as one with few. The special-order classification uses a 50 percent threshold, and accounts near the line could fall either way. And excluding unconverted quotes means the summary describes how fast customers order when they do, not how often they order at all.
References
Cleveland, W. S. (1993). Visualizing data. Hobart Press.
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.
Wilcox, R. R. (2017). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing (4th ed.). Academic Press.
Reading the GB 701 Unit 2 instructions
The second GB701 assignment asks you to summarize one variable from a business dataset and defend how you display it. Define the variable precisely, including its source, time period and any choices about what is counted. Report a full set of descriptive statistics, including center, spread and shape. Explain which statistics should lead given the distribution's shape. Produce figures that reveal the data's structure, and defend your choice against the display your organization usually uses. If subgroups behave differently, summarize them separately. State the limits of the summary. Rebuild software output into clear tables rather than pasting it. About four pages with two figures and a workbook, cited in APA 7, is common.
How this GB701 Unit 2 example is built
The exercise opens by defining quote-to-order time as days from the final revised quote to the purchase order, with Tukey on settling what a number measures. Table 1 reports ten statistics for all accounts. A section explains why the median leads, using the skewness and kurtosis, and another explains what the 5 percent trimmed mean adds, citing Wilcox. Figure 1 replaces the pooled histogram with stacked panels for 891 stock and 349 special-order accounts, and the highlighted sentence says the slow accounts were the middle of a second distribution. Figure 2 places box plots side by side, following Cleveland. Table 2 summarizes each group, a section describes what the display changes, and limits close the exercise.
Where the points sit in the GB701 Unit 2 rubric
GB701 instructors award points in this exercise for matching statistics to the data. A precise definition of the variable earns credit because every later number depends on it. A full set of descriptive statistics, with the leading ones chosen and justified by the distribution's shape, demonstrates judgment. Figures that reveal structure, especially subgroups, carry heavy weight, and defending the choice against a familiar display shows the writer thought about the reader. Separate summaries for groups that behave differently show insight. Clear rebuilt tables rather than software output, honest limits and APA 7 citations complete the rubric. GB701 graders also check that the summary and the figures tell the same story, so a reader who looks only at the panels reaches the conclusion the text states.
GB701 Unit 2 help: mistakes that cost points
In GB701 Unit 2 the usual slip is leading with the mean and standard deviation for a strongly skewed variable and never saying why they can mislead. Another is defining the variable loosely, so readers cannot tell what was measured. Many papers paste software output into the body. Figures are often chosen by default, such as one histogram for everything, when a split display would show the structure. Writers frequently describe subgroups only in the text without separate statistics. Define the variable exactly, choose leading statistics by shape, rebuild tables, pick displays that show the structure, summarize subgroups separately and state limits. Our writers can prepare a free custom descriptive summary for your dataset.
Get a GB701 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Attach the dataset or a description of it, along with the Unit 2 instructions and your rubric. Statistics chosen for the variable's actual shape, displays defended in writing and tables laid out to your section's formatting rules come back in a custom summary within 24-48h. There is no charge for a first sample. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More GB701 papers and MBA samples
- GB701 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- GB701 Unit 3: Probability Problem Set
- GB701 Unit 4: Sampling and Power Memo
- GB701 Unit 5: Confidence Interval Exercise
- GB701 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- GB701 Unit 7: Hypothesis Test Writeup
- GB701 Unit 8: Regression Model Report
- GB701 Unit 9: Assumption Diagnostics Memo
- GB701 Unit 10: Results Section Draft
- GB700 Unit 2: Article Critique
- GB601 Unit 2: Research Plan
- GB600 Unit 2: Environmental Scan Memo
- GB590 Unit 2: Ethical Framework Application
GB701 Unit 2 questions, answered
Should software output appear in the body?
Usually it goes in an appendix. Raw output from Excel, SPSS or R carries labels a reader does not need and omits ones they do. The body presents rebuilt tables with clear titles and notes, while the appendix lets an instructor confirm the numbers were produced by the software rather than typed by hand.
How many figures are enough?
Enough to show what the text claims, and seldom more than two or three. Each figure should earn its place by revealing something a table cannot, such as the shift between two groups in this sample. A figure that repeats a table's content adds length without adding evidence, and doctoral readers notice that kind of padding quickly.
Where can I find a free GB701 Unit 2 sample paper?
A complete GB701 Unit 2 descriptive summary exercise is on this page, defining quote-to-order time, reporting ten statistics, and replacing a pooled histogram with displays split by order type.
What does a trimmed mean show?
The average after removing a small share of the most extreme values at each end. Comparing it with the mean and median shows how much the tails pull the average.
Why use stacked histograms instead of one chart?
When groups behave differently, a single chart blends them into one shape. Stacked panels on a shared axis show each group's distribution and make the difference between them visible.