Written so another researcher could repeat it, the GB700 Unit 3 literature search log records sources, strings, dates, yields and inclusion decisions for a review of hybrid work and turnover. Searches like "gb 700 unit 3 assignment example", "gb700 unit 3 sample" and "gb700 unit 3 example" land here.
What a finished GB700 Unit 3 literature search log looks like
Seven pages: a one-page protocol, four tables and a closing note. The protocol states the question, how hybrid and remote arrangements relate to voluntary turnover among salaried professionals, and the inclusion rules: empirical or review articles, English, turnover measured as recorded quits or as stated intention to leave. Table 1 lists each source with the date searched, the exact string and the yield in brackets. Table 2 is the vocabulary map, showing which terms each discipline and database uses for the same arrangement. Table 3 is the decision ledger, dated, recording each change to the rules and why, including the population term dropped after it removed relevant studies. Table 4 counts records at each stage. The closing note reports the classmate's rerun and the difference found.
How a GB700 Unit 3 example is structured
Repeatability organizes every choice, and the log treats the vocabulary problem as the main threat to it. A search using only remote work would miss much of the psychology literature, and one using only telecommuting would miss nearly all recent economics, so strings combine an arrangement block and an outcome block, each with synonyms from all three fields and each database's own subject heading where one exists. The outcome block deliberately includes turnover intention alongside quits and attrition, because excluding intention studies would have removed most of the literature; instead, the ledger codes the two separately so later synthesis can keep them apart. Working papers are searched but flagged, never mixed with refereed work. Yields sit in brackets throughout because the counts will change when the search is rerun, and the log says what a rerun should expect to differ.
A question with its terms defined
Hybrid means a set schedule split between home and office; fully remote and occasional home work are coded separately. Voluntary turnover excludes layoffs and retirements. Defining both before searching lets every later inclusion call point back to a written rule.
Three fields, three vocabularies
The vocabulary map lines up work from home, remote work, telework, telecommuting, distributed work and flexible work arrangement against each database's subject terms. Seeing them side by side explains why earlier searches by the candidate returned so little from psychology.
Strings exactly as entered
Each string appears verbatim with truncation, field codes and limits, and the date it ran. Two strings that returned thousands of loosely related records are shown too, with the change that narrowed them, so the path to the final version is visible.
A ledger of decisions
Dropping the population term, keeping intention studies, excluding student samples, and flagging working papers are each dated and justified. The ledger is short, and every entry says what the change added or removed from the yield.
A rerun by someone else
A classmate ran two of the strings a few days later and matched the counts within [4] records, a gap traced to new database entries. The log reports this as evidence that the documentation is sufficient, and as a warning that counts drift.
Where marks go in GB700 Unit 3
Searches that cannot be repeated from the log alone are what this unit penalizes most, so database names without strings, or strings without dates and limits, leave the assignment's central requirement unmet. Missing synonyms draw sharp comments at doctoral level, since a review that never searched telecommuting cannot claim to have found the psychology evidence. Logs that record final strings but none of the decisions that produced them hide the judgment the instructor wants to see. Mixing working papers and practitioner reports into the yield without flags confuses the evidence base before synthesis starts. Inclusion rules stated vaguely, relevant studies only, cannot be applied by anyone else. Counts that do not add up across stages draw immediate correction. The upper range goes to a log a stranger could rerun, understanding each call made along the way.
Get a GB700 Unit 3 example written to your instructions
Give the desk your research area, any databases your section names, and the Unit 3 instructions with the rubric. Earlier search attempts help too, even failed ones. Back within 24-48h, the custom search log shows strings as entered, a vocabulary map for your topic and a dated ledger of inclusion decisions. No charge applies to the first.
GB700 Unit 3 questions, answered
Which databases suit a GB700 literature search?
Business Source Complete and ABI/INFORM cover most management journals, and many business topics also need a discipline database such as APA PsycInfo for organizational behavior or EconLit for economics. Working paper series are worth searching for recent evidence if they are flagged. The instructions and the library's holdings decide the final list, and the log should name each one.
Why record searches that did not work?
Because the path to a good string is part of what makes the search defensible. A committee member who wonders why a known study is missing can see which terms were tried and dropped. Recording failed or overly broad searches, briefly, also stops the same dead end being explored twice later in the program.
Should turnover intention studies be included with actual turnover?
Usually yes, but coded separately. Intention to leave is far more often measured than actual quits, so excluding it would shrink many literatures to a handful of studies. Intentions and departures are related but not the same, and a log that keeps them apart lets the synthesis show where conclusions rest on one kind of evidence only.