| Course | GB570 Managing the Value Chain |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 7 |
| Paper type | Integration case analysis |
| Length | About 1,140 words, 7 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | MBA |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for GB570 Unit 7
Owning the Mill: A Unit 7 Integration Case Analysis of an Olive Oil Brand's Upstream Stake
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
GB570: Managing the Value Chain
Unit 7 Integration Case Analysis
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The company, the mill, the cooperative and every figure are composite and illustrative; the frameworks and sources cited are real.
Background
Alder Quay bottles single-origin Alentejo olive oil in Chicago and sells it to grocery chains. Its oil comes from mills in southern Portugal through a Lisbon exporter that stores, tests and ships it. Before the purchase, Alder Quay had no direct relationship with any mill. Its tasting panel chose among lots the exporter offered, and in the two harvests before the purchase, 9.4 percent of the lots reserved for Alder Quay were later downgraded from extra virgin to virgin grade after failing chemistry or sensory tests, forcing substitutions and twice delaying shipments.
The mill, which this paper calls Lagar da Ribeira, crushed olives for the growers' cooperative near Serpa, about 1,400 tonnes of oil in a typical year. It was profitable but short of capital, and at peak harvest its single processing line left fruit waiting up to thirty hours in the yard. Alder Quay bought 55 percent of it for about €1.3 million, roughly $1.42 million at the time, and the cooperative kept 45 percent.
The Rationale at the Time of Purchase
The board memo of three years ago gave three reasons, which this analysis reconstructs in the language of transaction cost economics.
A timing requirement specific to Alder Quay. Williamson (1985) argued that when an investment is specific to one trading relationship, contracting becomes costly because each side fears the other will exploit the dependence. Alder Quay's profile required olives crushed within about eight hours of picking during the first three weeks of harvest, when fruit is greenest. Meeting that requirement meant a second processing line that would sit underused once the early weeks passed. No mill would build it on a one-year contract.
Few mills able to do it. Of the mills supplying the exporter, only two could run separate early-harvest batches at controlled temperature, and both sold their best lots to other buyers.
Repeated dealings. Alder Quay buys every year, and each harvest would require a new negotiation over timing, batch separation and price. Williamson (1985) treats frequent, specific transactions as the case where ownership most often beats the market.
Outcomes
Each of the stated reasons can be tested against three harvests.
Supply. The mill now supplies about 520 tonnes of oil a year in lots nominated for Alder Quay, about 60 percent of its needs. The oil still passes through the exporter, which stores and ships it, but the lots are fixed at the mill.
Quality. Alder Quay financed a second processing line as part of the purchase. Fruit waiting time at peak harvest fell from up to thirty hours to under eight, and the share of Alder Quay's lots downgraded from extra virgin fell from 9.4 percent to 2.6 percent across the three harvests. Clodoveo (2012) shows that the time and temperature of malaxation, the mixing of olive paste before separation, strongly affect the compounds that give fresh oil its bitterness and pungency, and the mill's new temperature logs show that its early-harvest batches now stay within the range Alder Quay specified.
Return. Alder Quay's share of the mill's profit has averaged about $88,000 a year in dividends. In addition, the exporter passes on a nominated-lot discount of $0.25 a kilogram on the mill's oil, because Alder Quay now arranges supply that the exporter once had to find, worth about $130,000 a year. Together these come to about $218,000 a year, roughly 15.4 percent on the $1.42 million stake.
The stake paid for itself in quality before it paid for itself in money: downgraded lots fell by more than two-thirds in the first harvest.
Costs Acquired
Ownership brought costs the board memo did not list.
Harvest weather. The second harvest after the purchase followed a dry summer, and the mill's output fell by about a fifth. Alder Quay's dividends fell with it, and its nominated lots were cut by about 90 tonnes, which the exporter covered from other mills at full price.
A partner with different priorities. The cooperative's members are also the mill's suppliers, and they want the highest possible price for their olives. Alder Quay, as majority owner, wants the mill to earn a profit. The two sides have argued at each annual meeting over the price the mill pays growers, and the compromise reached in the third year ties part of the grower price to the share of early-harvest fruit delivered.
Management time and travel. A quality manager from Chicago spends about seven weeks in Serpa each harvest, and Alder Quay's chief executive sits on the mill's board. Alder Quay puts the combined salary share and travel for that time at roughly $60,000 annually.
Currency. The stake is valued in euros and its dividends are paid in euros, so Alder Quay now carries a currency exposure it did not have before. Over three years, a weaker euro reduced the dollar value of dividends by about 4 percent.
The Stage Still Out of Reach
The purchase gave Alder Quay control over the mill, but the oil still travels through the exporter's tanks, where it is stored alongside oil from ten other mills, filtered and shipped. Alder Quay's single-origin claim therefore still depends on the exporter's records of which oil went into which tank. Harrigan (1984) describes this as a form of tapered integration, in which a firm owns part of a stage and buys the rest, and notes that it combines some benefits of ownership with some dependence on outside suppliers. For Alder Quay, the remaining dependence sits at precisely the point where its label claims are hardest to verify.
Verdict
Measured against the reasons given at the time, the integration succeeded on quality and on supply, and it succeeded modestly on return. A 15.4 percent annual return is acceptable but not exceptional, and after management time and currency losses it falls to about 11 percent. The integration is incomplete on control, because the step between the mill and Alder Quay's dock is still owned by someone else. The partnership with the cooperative has also worked better than the board feared. Linking part of the grower price to early-harvest deliveries gave members a reason to pick green fruit, and the share of early-harvest olives reaching the mill rose from about a quarter to more than a third of the crop. That change came from the contract, not the steel, which suggests the stake bought influence as much as capacity. The next question, examined in Unit 8, is how much of what the label claims Alder Quay can actually prove through that step.
References
Clodoveo, M. L. (2012). Malaxation: Influence on virgin olive oil quality. Past, present and future: An overview. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 25(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2011.11.004
Harrigan, K. R. (1984). Formulating vertical integration strategies. Academy of Management Review, 9(4), 638-652. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277387
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press.
The Purdue Global GB570 Unit 7 instructions
In the seventh GB570 unit you analyze a case in which a firm bought a stage of its value chain. Describe the firm and the stage before the purchase, including the problem the purchase was meant to solve. Reconstruct the rationale given at the time and express it in the terms of a course framework, usually transaction cost economics. Test each stated reason against results, with figures where the case provides them. Then list the costs and risks that ownership brought, including any the firm did not anticipate. Identify any control the purchase did not deliver. Close with a verdict that separates success on each reason. Graders expect rationale, outcomes and verdict in separate sections. Six pages with exhibits and APA 7 references is common.
How this GB570 Unit 7 example is built
The background section describes Alder Quay before the stake, when 9.4 percent of its reserved lots failed the extra virgin grade. The rationale section restates the board's three reasons in Williamson's terms, an investment in a second line specific to Alder Quay's early-harvest timing, few capable mills and frequent dealings. Outcomes are tested reason by reason: supply of 520 tonnes, downgrades cut to 2.6 percent with Clodoveo on malaxation temperature, and a return of 15.4 percent. The highlighted sentence observes that quality paid back before money did. Four acquired costs follow, from a dry harvest to a weaker euro. Harrigan's tapered integration frames the exporter's tanks as the stage still beyond reach, and the verdict separates quality, return and control.
Where the points sit in the GB570 Unit 7 rubric
Most points in this GB570 case analysis follow from whether the verdict rests on evidence. A rationale reconstructed from the firm's stated reasons, not invented in hindsight, earns credit because the outcomes can then be tested against it. Expressing that rationale in a course framework such as transaction cost economics shows conceptual command. Outcomes measured with figures, one stated reason at a time, carry heavy weight. A balanced section on costs and risks acquired, including unexpected ones, shows the writer is not simply defending the purchase. Naming the control the integration did not deliver demonstrates insight into where the chain still depends on others. A verdict that grades each reason separately completes the argument, and clear exhibits with APA 7 citations finish the rubric.
GB570 Unit 7 help from the desk
Integration papers in GB570 often judge the purchase against goals the writer invents rather than the reasons the firm gave, which makes any verdict easy to reach. Some merge rationale, outcomes and verdict into one narrative, so the instructor cannot see which evidence supports which conclusion. Return figures are frequently reported without subtracting management time, currency effects or partner costs. Another gap is ignoring what the purchase did not control, such as a downstream stage still owned by a supplier. Theory sometimes appears only in the introduction instead of shaping the rationale. Keep the three parts separate, measure each reason against results, count the costs fully, name the remaining dependence and give a graded verdict. A free custom case analysis can be prepared by our writers.
Get a GB570 Unit 7 example written to your instructions
If your prompt assigns a named company, include it; if it asks you to choose, say which industry interests you. Add the Unit 7 case instructions and the rubric. Every figure in the sample is sourced or labeled as an estimate, the first custom sample is free, and turnaround runs 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More GB570 papers and MBA samples
- GB570 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- GB570 Unit 2: Value Chain Map
- GB570 Unit 3: Margin Analysis
- GB570 Unit 4: Make or Buy Analysis
- GB570 Unit 5: Supplier Dependence Review
- GB570 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- GB570 Unit 8: Traceability Audit
- GB570 Unit 9: Chain Redesign Proposal
- GB570 Unit 10: Value Chain Report
- GB560 Unit 7: Process Design Proposal
- GB550 Unit 7: Capital Budgeting Analysis
- GB546 Unit 7: Recruiting Funnel Analysis
- GB545 Unit 7: Incentive Plan Proposal
GB570 Unit 7 questions, answered
What theories fit a vertical integration case?
Transaction cost economics is the usual anchor: asset specificity, uncertainty and frequency explain when owning a stage beats contracting for it. The resource-based view adds whether the stage holds a capability rivals cannot copy. Your course text may favor one; use that one, and apply it to the specific stage rather than defining it in general terms.
Can the case be a real company?
Often it must be. Well-documented integrations include automakers buying stakes in battery material suppliers, streaming services producing their own content, and retailers acquiring logistics firms. Public filings, earnings calls and business press give the before-and-after evidence a verdict needs. Choosing a case at least a few years old means outcomes exist to measure.
How is an integration judged a success?
Against the reasons the firm gave at the time, not against goals invented in hindsight. If the stated aim was supply security, measure supply; if it was quality, measure rejections or complaints. Then add what the firm did not expect, good or bad. A verdict built that way can say an integration succeeded on one aim and failed on another.
Where can I find a free GB570 Unit 7 sample paper?
The complete GB570 Unit 7 integration case analysis on this page examines a composite olive oil brand's majority stake in a Portuguese mill, with the rationale, three harvests of outcomes, acquired costs and a graded verdict.
What is tapered integration?
A firm owns part of a stage and buys the rest from outside suppliers. It keeps some benefits of ownership, such as quality control, while staying flexible, but it also keeps some dependence on the suppliers it still uses.