Nine stages from application to day ninety, with the biggest unplanned leak traced to an assessment that fails on phones, make up the funnel analysis Halden builds for GB546. Searches like "gb 546 unit 7 assignment example", "gb546 unit 7 sample" and "gb546 unit 7 example" land here.
What a finished GB546 Unit 7 recruiting funnel analysis looks like
Five pages holding a funnel table, a device breakdown and a projection. The table carries each stage with its count, conversion and loss: 2,960 applications, 1,540 past the knockout screen, 910 completing the online assessment, 612 interviewed, 402 offered, 338 accepting, 301 clearing background and drug screens, 262 starting and 214 at day ninety. The knockout screen removes the most people, 1,420, but by design. The largest unintended drop is the assessment, where 630 qualified applicants, 40.9 percent, never finish. The device table explains why: 46.1 percent of those invited on a phone complete it, against 84.6 percent on a desktop. A projection shows that lifting mobile completion to 70 percent would add about 244 completers and roughly 57 more operators still employed at day ninety each quarter.
How a GB546 Unit 7 example is structured
The analysis opens by defining each stage precisely, since a funnel with ambiguous stages cannot be compared across quarters. The table follows, then a classification of every drop as designed, candidate-driven or process-driven, because only the last is directly fixable. The largest process-driven loss gets a full section: the evidence it rests on, device data from the assessment vendor, and the alternative explanations tested and rejected, such as applicants simply losing interest, which would affect desktop users too. The projection is kept conservative and stated as an estimate. Secondary leaks receive a paragraph each, including 39 cleared candidates who never started. Recommendations stay limited to what the evidence supports: a mobile-ready assessment, shortened from fifty-five minutes, with a completion target and a review date in the following quarter.
Nine stages, defined
Each stage given an exact entry rule so the same funnel can be rebuilt next quarter and compared line for line.
Designed, chosen, leaked
Every drop classified as screening, candidate withdrawal or process failure, because only the third belongs to the recruiting team.
Six hundred thirty unfinished
The assessment losing 40.9 percent of qualified applicants, and the device split of 46.1 against 84.6 percent completion.
Rival explanations tested
Waning interest and assessment difficulty considered and rejected, since neither accounts for the gap between phones and desktops.
Fifty-seven more at day ninety
The conservative projection from a mobile-ready assessment, stated as an estimate alongside the conversion rates it assumes.
Where marks go in GB546 Unit 7
Drawing the funnel as a graphic and stopping there earns little in this unit; the prompt asks why candidates leave where they leave. Credit follows a cause supported by evidence. Treating every drop as a problem confuses screening, which is supposed to remove people, with leakage, which is not. Conversion rates reported without counts hide how many people each percentage represents. Analyses naming a cause without testing an alternative explanation read as guesses, and graders often ask what else could produce the same pattern. The day-ninety stage is frequently left off, which ends the funnel at the moment the costliest losses begin. Projections promising large gains from small fixes, with no stated assumption behind them, undermine an otherwise careful analysis.
Get a GB546 Unit 7 example written to your instructions
Counts at each hiring stage are the core input, as the Unit 7 data gives them or as a requisition you can describe without naming anyone would show them, along with the rubric. The analysis returns inside 24-48h with drops classified, the largest leak explained by evidence and a projection stated conservatively. No fee for a first sample.
GB546 Unit 7 questions, answered
Why carry a recruiting funnel all the way to day ninety?
Because a hire who leaves in the first weeks must be recruited again, and the reasons often trace back to how the funnel worked. Ending at the start date hides that loss. The example carries the funnel to day ninety and notes where early departures cluster. If your data stops at hire, say so and explain what the missing stage might show.
How is the largest drop decided?
Define largest before measuring it. The knockout screen removes the most people, but intentionally, so the example separates designed drops from unintended ones and ranks only the second group. Some analyses rank by percentage lost, others by absolute count. State which your paper uses, since the choice can change which stage gets the attention.
Where would device data come from?
Most assessment and applicant tracking vendors record the device or browser used, and some report completion rates by device directly. In the example this data is composite. If your case lacks it, you can propose collecting it as part of the recommendation, which is a legitimate finding when the evidence needed to test a cause does not yet exist.