GB527 Unit 9 Demand Forecast Example

Reviewed by Chester Goodwin, MBA Global Operations Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This GB527 Unit 9 demand forecast tests three methods on two years of a composite irrigation valve maker's aftermarket sales to dealers. Purdue Global GB 527, Global Operations, asks MBA students to compare forecasting methods on data they were not built on. Platte Valve Works sold 5,239 valves in year one and 5,606 in year two, with peaks in March and April and again in September. A three-month moving average errs by a MAD of about 168 valves and exponential smoothing by about 134, missing March by 373. A seasonal index model cuts MAD to about 30, but a tracking signal reaching 5.3 shows it drifting low after six new dealers joined.

CourseGB527 Global Operations
UnitUnit 9
Paper typeDemand forecast
LengthAbout 1,100 words, 7 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramMBA
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for GB527 Unit 9

1

Three Forecasts Tested on a Year They Never Saw: A Unit 9 Demand Forecast for Aftermarket Irrigation Valves

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

GB527: Global Operations

Unit 9 Demand Forecast

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The manufacturer, its dealers and every sales figure are composite and illustrative; the methods and sources cited are real.

What this part is doingNaming both failures in the lead tells the reader the paper will judge the best method as well as the worst.
2

The Data

Platte Valve Works sells replacement valves and regulators to irrigation dealers, separate from the valves it ships to pivot manufacturers. Monthly aftermarket sales over two years were:

Year one: 265, 395, 734, 732, 460, 345, 314, 390, 581, 440, 312 and 271, for 5,239 valves.

Year two: 276, 406, 735, 712, 472, 387, 338, 396, 607, 530, 395 and 352, for 5,606 valves.

Plotted, the series has two peaks each year. The larger, in March and April, comes as dealers repair systems before the irrigation season. The smaller, in September, comes as farmers order retrofits after harvest. Demand grew about 7 percent from year one to year two.

The Test

Year one was used to set up each method. Each method then forecast year two one month ahead, using actual sales up to the month before. Accuracy was measured by mean absolute deviation (MAD), the average size of the error in valves, and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), the average error as a share of actual sales. Hyndman and Athanasopoulos (2021) recommend testing forecasting methods on data not used to build them, because a method that fits its own history well may forecast poorly.

Exhibit 1: The Error Table

Three-month moving average: MAD about 168 valves; MAPE about 35.3 percent.

Simple exponential smoothing, alpha 0.3: MAD about 134 valves; MAPE about 27.9 percent.

Seasonal index model: MAD about 30 valves; MAPE about 6.5 percent.

Why the First Two Methods Fail

The moving average and exponential smoothing both forecast the next month from recent months. Neither has any way to know that March is different from February. In March of year two, exponential smoothing forecast about 362 valves; dealers bought 735. The forecast missed by 373 valves, more than the whole of a typical January. The moving average missed the same peak by even more, then forecast high in summer because the spring peak was still in its average.

Both simple methods chase the season instead of anticipating it, so they are lowest just before the peak and highest just after it.

What this part is doingThe highlighted sentence explains the pattern behind the large errors so the reader understands why the seasonal model wins.
3

The Seasonal Index Model

The seasonal model divides each month of year one by year one's monthly average of about 437 to obtain an index. March and April each have an index of about 1.68, meaning they run 68 percent above an average month; January's is about 0.61. The model forecasts each month of year two as a level, set at year one's average raised by an assumed 4 percent growth, about 454 valves, multiplied by that month's index.

This model forecast March of year two at about 763 valves against actual sales of 735, an error of 28. Across the year its MAD of about 30 valves is less than a quarter of exponential smoothing's.

Exhibit 2: Catching the Seasonal Model Drifting

A low average error can hide a bias. A tracking signal shows whether the misses keep leaning one way: it is the cumulative signed error expressed in units of the MAD measured up to that month. Values beyond about plus or minus four are a common warning limit.

Errors by month (actual minus forecast): 0, minus 5, minus 28, minus 49, minus 6, 28, 11, minus 10, 3, 72, 71 and 70.

Tracking signal: it fell to about minus 4.0 in April and minus 5.0 in May, then recovered, and rose to about 3.4 in November and 5.3 in December.

Two biases appear. In spring, the model forecast too high: the 4 percent growth assumption overstated demand in a season when dealers bought about the same as the year before. From October, the model forecast too low by about 70 valves a month, three months running. The cause was in the business, not the data: Platte signed six new dealers in Mato Grosso and Kansas over the summer, and their autumn orders added demand the model had no way to know about.

What this part is doingLinking the tracking signal's swing to the new dealers shows how a statistical warning leads to a business explanation.
4

What the Errors Cost

Forecast error is not only a statistic. Heizer et al. (2020) point out that forecasts drive scheduling, purchasing and staffing, so the cost of an error depends on what it causes. Under exponential smoothing, the March miss of 373 valves would have left dealers waiting in the busiest weeks of their year, and the summer over-forecasts would have built stock that sat until the next spring. Under the seasonal model, the autumn under-forecast of about 70 valves a month meant three months of tight stock and some expedited orders for the new dealers. At Platte's margins, an expedited shipment costs about $45 more than a planned one, so the autumn bias cost roughly $9,000 in freight alone, small next to what the simple methods would have cost but large enough to justify watching the tracking signal.

Recommendations

Use a seasonal method with updating. Move from fixed indices to a method that updates its level, trend and seasonal indices each month, such as Holt-Winters exponential smoothing, which Hyndman and Athanasopoulos (2021) describe for data with trend and seasonality.

Watch the tracking signal monthly. Treat a value beyond plus or minus four as a prompt to look for a cause, not only to adjust the numbers.

Add business information. Ask the sales team each month for changes in the dealer network and large known orders, and adjust the forecast for them. Chopra and Meindl (2019) recommend combining statistical forecasts with market intelligence, because a model can only project patterns already in its data.

Forecast in ranges. Report each month's forecast with a range based on recent errors, so that inventory and production planning can allow for uncertainty.

Use in Planning

A better aftermarket forecast feeds the seasonal reorder point from Unit 5 and the capacity planning from Unit 3. The March and April peak, now forecast within about 30 valves, should set the start of Saturday shifts and the timing of the higher reorder point for solenoid coils.

Limits

Two years of data provide only two observations of each month's seasonal pattern, so the indices are imprecise. A drought year or a sharp change in crop prices could shift the pattern in ways the history does not show. The forecast should be rebuilt each year with the added data, and the seasonal indices compared with the year before to see whether the pattern itself is shifting.

5

References

Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2019). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (7th ed.). Pearson.

Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2020). Operations management: Sustainability and supply chain management (13th ed.). Pearson.

Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2021). Forecasting: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). OTexts.

GB527 Unit 9 instructions, in plain terms

In GB527 Unit 9 you develop and test demand forecasts for a product. Plot or describe the history and its pattern, including trend and seasonality. Build each method on the earlier part of the data and test it one period ahead on the later part. Report accuracy with measures such as MAD and MAPE, and explain why each method succeeds or fails. Check the best method for bias with a tracking signal and look for a business cause behind any warning. Recommend a forecasting approach, including how business information will be added, and explain how the forecast feeds planning. Close with limits. Expect about five pages with charts and an error table, citing forecasting sources in APA 7.

How this GB527 Unit 9 example is built

The forecast lists both years' monthly sales and explains the spring and autumn peaks. The test method builds each model on year one and forecasts year two a month ahead, citing Hyndman and Athanasopoulos on out-of-sample testing. Exhibit 1 reports MAD and MAPE for all three methods, and the highlighted sentence explains why simple methods chase the season. The seasonal model's indices, such as 1.68 for March and April, are explained. Exhibit 2 lists monthly errors and the tracking signal, which shows spring over-forecasts and autumn under-forecasts tied to new dealers. A section prices the errors, citing Heizer and colleagues. Recommendations add Holt-Winters updating and sales input, citing Chopra and Meindl.

GB527 Unit 9 rubric: what earns full points

GB527 instructors look for methods tested on data they did not see and errors explained rather than only reported. Describing the pattern before choosing methods earns early credit. Testing one period ahead on held-out data shows sound practice. Reporting MAD and MAPE for every method allows comparison. Explaining why simple methods miss a seasonal peak carries significant weight. Checking the best method for bias with a tracking signal, and tracing a warning to a business cause, shows depth. Recommendations that combine an updating method with market information complete it. The forecast's APA 7 sources are Hyndman and Athanasopoulos, Chopra and Meindl and the Heizer operations text.

GB527 Unit 9 help from the desk

Many GB527 Unit 9 forecasts fit methods to the whole history and report how well they fit, which says little about how they will forecast. Others choose the method with the lowest average error and never check whether its errors lean one way. A common gap is the business cause: a tracking signal warning is a prompt to ask what changed, such as new dealers or a lost customer. Some writers ignore seasonality entirely. Describe the pattern, build on one period and test on the next, report MAD and MAPE, explain each failure, check bias with a tracking signal and add business information to the method you recommend. Reporting each month's forecast as a range helps planners allow for the error that remains.

Get a GB527 Unit 9 example written to your instructions

Provide the demand history, ideally two years or more by month or week, what the item is, and the Unit 9 prompt with its rubric. Methods are tested on data they did not see, with MAD, MAPE and bias reported; the first custom sample is free, turned around in 24-48h. Sensitive series can be scaled first. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More GB527 papers and MBA samples

GB527 Unit 9 questions, answered

Which error measure should I report?

Report at least two, one for size and one for direction. MAD gives error in units, MAPE in percent, which helps when comparing items of different volume, and a tracking signal or cumulative bias shows whether the forecast leans high or low. If your course names a specific measure, lead with that one and add the others briefly.

How much history do I need for a seasonal forecast?

Ideally two or more full seasonal cycles: one to estimate the indices and at least one to test them. With a single year, indices can still be estimated, but the test must use a shorter holdout, and the paper ought to admit that each month's index rests on a single observation.

What does a tracking signal above 4 mean?

That errors are piling up in one direction faster than random variation would explain. Many texts use limits around plus or minus 4. A positive signal means demand keeps exceeding the forecast. The response is to find the cause, such as growth the method ignores, and adjust the model rather than simply widening the limits.

Where can I find a free GB527 Unit 9 sample paper?

This page carries a full GB527 Unit 9 demand forecast comparing three methods on two years of aftermarket valve sales, with an error table, a tracking signal, recommendations and APA 7 references.

What does the tracking signal show that MAD does not?

MAD measures the average size of errors but not their direction. The tracking signal adds up signed errors relative to MAD, so a value beyond plus or minus four shows the forecast is consistently too high or too low.