GB520 Unit 4 Recruiting Strategy and Decision Matrix Example

Reviewed by Chester Goodwin, MBA Strategic Human Resource Management Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This GB520 Unit 4 recruiting strategy sets out how a composite refrigeration contractor can add about 36 licensed journeyman technicians and five experienced lead technicians over two years in a tight regional market. Purdue Global GB 520, Strategic Human Resource Management, asks MBA students to compare sourcing options against the strategy they serve. Kestrel Refrigeration Services' decision matrix scores an expanded apprenticeship, lateral hiring with retention terms, acquiring a twelve-person Illinois contractor and subcontracting on time, cost, risk and fit. Lateral hiring scores highest at 3.85, but no option wins every criterion, so the strategy combines them by role and timing, with messages matched to recruiting stages.

CourseGB520 Strategic Human Resource Management
UnitUnit 4
Paper typeRecruiting strategy
LengthAbout 1,010 words, 6 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramMBA
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for GB520 Unit 4

1

Thirty-Six Licensed Technicians in Two Years: A Unit 4 Recruiting Strategy With a Decision Matrix

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

GB520: Strategic Human Resource Management

Unit 4 Recruiting Strategy

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The contractor, the acquisition target and every figure are composite and illustrative; the sources cited are real.

What this part is doingStating the target and the four options in the lead frames the matrix as a choice among real alternatives.
2

The Target

The workforce plan from Unit 3 found that Kestrel Refrigeration Services needs about 18 new journeyman technicians a year for two years, plus two or three experienced CO2 lead technicians a year, to staff its tripled installation plan and the Illinois branch. Kestrel's current recruiting brings about eight journeymen a year, mostly through employee referrals. The regional market is tight: equipment manufacturers, supermarket chains' own maintenance teams and other contractors are all hiring refrigeration technicians.

The Four Options

1. Expanded registered apprenticeship. Kestrel would run a registered apprenticeship with a community college's refrigeration program, raising intake from 8 to 22 apprentices a year. Apprentices work on crews under journeymen and attend classes two evenings a week for about four years.

2. Lateral hiring with retention terms. Kestrel would recruit licensed journeymen from other contractors and from manufacturers' service teams, offering a $10,000 sign-on bonus repayable in part if the technician leaves within 18 months, plus pay near the top of the market for CO2 experience.

3. Acquiring a small contractor. A twelve-person refrigeration contractor near Chicago, whose owner is retiring, has nine licensed technicians, one lead and about 40 supermarket service accounts. Its price would be about $2.4 million.

4. Subcontracting. Kestrel would hire a mechanical subcontractor's pipefitting crews to work on installations under Kestrel's leads during the busy season.

Exhibit 1: The Decision Matrix

Each option gets a score on four weighted criteria, where 5 is the best and 1 the worst:

Time to productive capacity (30 percent): apprenticeship 1, since an apprentice takes about four years to complete; lateral hiring 5, about two months; acquisition 4, about six months to close; subcontracting 5, available within weeks.

Cost per productive technician (25 percent): apprenticeship 3, about $52,000 per completed journeyman after tuition, supervision and non-completers; lateral hiring 4, about $20,000 over two years in recruiting, sign-on and pay premium; acquisition 2, about $240,000 per licensed technician, though the price also buys customers; subcontracting 2, about $50,000 a year in markup per full-time equivalent, with nothing retained.

Risk (20 percent): apprenticeship 4, mainly completion risk; lateral hiring 3, since hires may leave for the next offer and their skill is uneven; acquisition 2, with integration and flight risk; subcontracting 2, with quality and schedule control held by another firm.

Fit with the strategy (25 percent): apprenticeship 5, since apprentices learn Kestrel's CO2 standards from the start; lateral hiring 3; acquisition 3, bringing a branch and local customers but different work habits; subcontracting 1, building no lasting capability.

Weighted scores: lateral hiring 3.85; apprenticeship 3.10; acquisition 2.85; subcontracting 2.65.

No single option wins on every criterion: lateral hiring is fastest at a good cost, the apprenticeship fits best, and only the acquisition brings a ready-made Illinois branch.

What this part is doingThe highlighted sentence explains why the strategy combines options instead of choosing the top score.
3

The Strategy: A Portfolio by Role and Timing

Cappelli (2008) argues that firms facing uncertain demand should combine developing talent internally with buying it from outside, so that each covers the other's weakness. Kestrel's strategy does that.

Lateral hiring carries the first two years. It should supply about 20 of the 36 journeymen and most of the five experienced leads. Recruiting will target technicians at manufacturers' service teams and smaller contractors, where CO2 experience exists but advancement is limited.

The apprenticeship supplies the following years. Apprentices hired now complete in about four years. Kestrel should expand intake this year so that the pipeline is in place when lateral hiring becomes expensive. Some apprentices complete early with prior experience, which will add a few journeymen within the two years.

The acquisition is evaluated as the Illinois entry, not as a hiring tool. At about $240,000 per technician it is expensive as recruiting, but it would bring nine licensed technicians, a lead and customers to a market where Kestrel has none. The decision belongs with the growth plan, with retention agreements for the acquired technicians if it proceeds.

Subcontracting fills the remaining installation-season gap. It should cover about 6 to 9 journeyman equivalents during the peak months, shrinking as hires and apprentices arrive.

Recruiting Messages and Channels

Uggerslev et al. (2012) found that what attracts applicants changes across the recruiting process: early on, job and organization features matter most, while later, how recruiters treat applicants and how the process feels gain weight. For Kestrel, early messages should feature what scarce technicians value, CO2 training, a route to lead and mostly local work, and later stages should be quick, with offers within a week of the interview.

Channels should match the source. For lateral hires: referrals with a bonus, trade association job boards and direct outreach to technicians at manufacturers. For apprentices: high school career programs, veterans' transition programs and community college refrigeration classes.

What this part is doingMatching messages to recruiting stages shows the plan rests on evidence about how applicants decide.
4

Costs

Over two years, the recruiting strategy would cost about $400,000 for 20 lateral hires, about $280,000 a year for the expanded apprenticeship's tuition and supervision, and about $450,000 a year in subcontracting markup at the peak. The acquisition is outside this budget.

Risks and Safeguards

Repayment clauses for sign-on bonuses are restricted or regulated in some states, so the terms should be reviewed before use in each state where Kestrel hires. Aggressive lateral hiring invites competitors to respond, and Kestrel should expect to lose some of its own technicians to counteroffers, a risk the retention work in Unit 9 addresses. Apprentice completion should be tracked by cohort, with mentors assigned in the first year, when most departures happen.

Measures

The strategy should be tracked by time to fill, acceptance rate, cost per hire by source, first-year retention by source and apprentice completion. Cascio et al. (2019) recommend estimating the cost of each source together with the quality and tenure of its hires, since a cheap source that produces short-tenure hires is expensive.

5

References

Cappelli, P. (2008). Talent on demand: Managing talent in an age of uncertainty. Harvard Business Press.

Cascio, W. F., Boudreau, J. W., & Fink, A. A. (2019). Investing in people: Financial impact of human resource initiatives (3rd ed.). Society for Human Resource Management.

Uggerslev, K. L., Fassina, N. E., & Kraichy, D. (2012). Recruiting through the stages: A meta-analytic test of predictors of applicant attraction at different stages of the recruiting process. Personnel Psychology, 65(3), 597-660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01254.x

What the GB520 Unit 4 assignment asks for

GB520 Unit 4 asks you to design a recruiting strategy that supports an organization's workforce plan. State the hiring target and the market conditions. Compare several sourcing options, including at least one that builds talent internally and one that buys it, using a weighted decision matrix with criteria such as time to productive capacity, cost per hire, risk and fit with the strategy. Recommend a strategy, which may combine options, and explain how each serves a role or time period. Describe recruiting messages and channels supported by research. Close with costs, risks and the measures you would track. Cite recruiting and human resource sources in APA 7.

Inside the GB520 Unit 4 example

The strategy restates the target from the workforce plan and the competing employers. Four options are described, from a 22-apprentice intake to a $2.4 million acquisition. Exhibit 1 scores each on four weighted criteria, with costs per productive technician from about $20,000 for lateral hires to about $240,000 through the acquisition, and the highlighted sentence explains why no option wins outright. The portfolio, following Cappelli, uses lateral hiring for the first two years, the apprenticeship for later years, the acquisition as the Illinois entry and subcontracting for peaks. Messages follow Uggerslev and colleagues. Costs, repayment-clause risk and measures follow, citing Cascio and colleagues on source quality. Measures by source include time to fill, acceptance rate, cost per hire and first-year retention, so cheap sources that produce short-tenure hires are visible.

GB520 Unit 4 rubric: what earns full points

GB520 rubric credit for this strategy depends on a clear target, a fair comparison of options and a recommendation tied to roles and timing. Each option should be described concretely and scored on stated, weighted criteria. Costs per productive hire earn credit when their basis is shown. Recognizing that options can be combined carries significant weight. Recruiting messages and channels grounded in research about applicant decisions show depth. Legal risks such as repayment clauses and measures by source complete it. The strategy's APA 7 list pairs Cappelli on talent supply with Uggerslev's meta-analysis of applicant attraction and Cascio on costing sources.

GB520 Unit 4 help: mistakes that cost points

Many GB520 Unit 4 strategies pick the option with the highest matrix score and stop. Others list job boards without explaining why each suits the people sought. A frequent gap is timing: an apprenticeship cannot fill a two-year gap, but it can fill the years after, and the strategy should say so. Some writers ignore the legal limits on sign-on repayment terms. State the target, compare options on weighted criteria, combine them by role and timing, match messages to applicant stages and track cost and retention by source. Treating an acquisition as a growth decision rather than a hiring tool also shows sound judgment.

Get a GB520 Unit 4 example written to your instructions

Recruiting strategies turn on the gap being filled, which makes the Unit 4 scenario the key input; forward it, or the talent shortage at an employer you can describe in general terms, together with the rubric. The strategy returns within 24-48h, options scored against stated criteria and sequenced by quarter. The first one carries no fee. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More GB520 papers and MBA samples

GB520 Unit 4 questions, answered

Do sign-on bonuses with repayment clauses create legal problems?

They can. Some states restrict repayment agreements, and a deduction that pushes pay below minimum wage may be unlawful. The example includes the bonus with a prorated repayment term and flags the question for employment counsel in each state the firm operates in. Graduate sections usually expect that kind of risk flag rather than a legal opinion.

Where can I find a free GB520 Unit 4 sample paper?

This page carries a full GB520 Unit 4 recruiting strategy for a refrigeration contractor, with four sourcing options, a weighted decision matrix, a combined strategy, messages and channels, and APA 7 references.

Why not simply choose lateral hiring, the highest score?

Lateral hiring is fast but expensive to sustain and invites competitors to respond. The apprenticeship fits the strategy best for later years, and only the acquisition brings a ready Illinois branch, so the strategy uses each where it is strongest.

Why treat the acquisition as a growth decision rather than a hiring tool?

At about $240,000 per licensed technician it is costly as recruiting, but it also brings customers and a branch in a new state. That value belongs in the growth plan's decision, with retention agreements if it proceeds.

How do recruiting messages change across the process?

Early messages should feature what scarce technicians value, such as CO2 training, a route to lead and mostly local work. Later stages should be quick and respectful, since recruiters' treatment and the process itself weigh more as candidates near a decision.