GB513 Unit 8 Simple Regression Analysis Example

Reviewed by Chester Goodwin, MBA Business Analytics Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This GB513 Unit 8 simple regression analysis models annual maintenance cost against miles driven for a composite fleet of 45 refrigerated delivery trucks. Purdue Global GB 513, Business Analytics, teaches MBA students to read regression output, not only run it. The fitted line, cost of 1,896.9 plus 112.66 dollars per thousand miles, has an R squared of 0.761 and a standard error of about $914. The ANOVA F of 137 and a slope interval of $93 to $132 per thousand miles are read in plain language, residual and normality checks follow, and truck age emerges as the missing variable. A truck planned at 60,000 miles is budgeted near $8,657, with a prediction interval of about $6,780 to $10,540.

CourseGB513 Business Analytics
UnitUnit 8
Paper typeSimple regression analysis
LengthAbout 850 words, 6 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramMBA
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for GB513 Unit 8

1

Miles Explain Most of the Maintenance Bill: A Unit 8 Simple Regression for a Delivery Fleet Budget

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

GB513: Business Analytics

Unit 8 Simple Regression Analysis

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The fleet, its trucks and every figure are composite and illustrative; the methods cited are real.

What this part is doingGiving R squared, the slope and the prediction in the lead shows what the reading of the output will produce.
2

The Business Question

Ridgeway Foodservice runs 45 refrigerated delivery trucks. The fleet manager, Tomas Reyes, must budget maintenance for next year, when planned mileage per truck ranges from about 25,000 to 75,000 miles depending on route. He wants to know how much maintenance cost rises with miles and what to budget for a truck planned at 60,000 miles.

Scatter Plot

A scatter plot of last year's data, miles in thousands on the horizontal axis and maintenance dollars on the vertical, shows a clear upward pattern. The fitted line has the equation predicted cost equals 1,896.9 plus 112.66 times miles in thousands, and the chart shows R squared of 0.761.

Regression Statistics

R Square: 0.7612. Standard error of the regression: $913.8. Observations: 45.

Reading this table: about 76 percent of the variation in maintenance cost across trucks is associated with differences in miles driven. The remaining 24 percent reflects other factors, such as truck age, route terrain and driver habits. The standard error means a typical truck's actual cost differs from the line's prediction by about $914 (Levine et al., 2021).

ANOVA Table

Regression sum of squares: about 114.5 million. Residual sum of squares: about 35.9 million. F statistic: about 137.1, with a significance F far below 0.001.

Reading this table: the F test asks whether the model explains more variation than chance would. An F of 137 with a p-value near zero means miles are clearly related to cost.

Coefficients

Intercept: 1,896.9, standard error 472.0.

Miles (thousands): 112.66, standard error 9.62, t statistic 11.71, p-value about 0.000000000000006. At 95 percent confidence, the slope lies between 93.25 and 132.07.

Reading this table: each additional thousand miles is associated with about $113 more maintenance cost, and we can be fairly sure the true figure lies between about $93 and $132. The intercept, about $1,900, can be read as the fixed annual cost of keeping a truck in service, such as inspections and refrigeration unit checks, although no truck drove zero miles, so it is an extrapolation and should not be pushed hard (Anderson et al., 2020).

The slope is the budget figure that matters: each thousand miles adds about $113, and the interval of $93 to $132 tells the fleet manager how far to trust it.

What this part is doingThe highlighted sentence identifies the coefficient the budget decision rests on.
3

Residual Plot

A plot of residuals against miles shows points scattered evenly above and below zero across the range, with no curve and no widening funnel. A straight line therefore looks adequate for this range and that the spread of errors is similar for low- and high-mileage trucks. Three trucks sit about $1,800 to $2,000 above the line; all three are among the oldest in the fleet, which suggests truck age could improve the model.

Checking the Other Assumptions

Two more checks support the model. A histogram of the residuals is roughly bell shaped, with no long tail, so the t-based intervals are reasonable. And the trucks' costs were recorded independently, one invoice history per truck, so there is no reason to expect one truck's error to affect another's. The data cover about 21,600 to 76,400 miles, which includes the 60,000-mile prediction, so the forecast does not extrapolate beyond what the fleet has experienced.

What the Model Leaves Out

About a quarter of the variation in cost is unexplained. Truck age is the most likely cause, as the residual plot suggests, and Ridgeway's records include each truck's model year. Route type also matters: trucks on stop-and-go city routes wear brakes faster than highway trucks at the same mileage. A multiple regression adding age and a city route indicator would likely raise R squared and narrow the prediction interval, which would let the budget carry less contingency.

Prediction and Budget

For a truck planned at 60,000 miles, the predicted maintenance cost is 1,896.9 plus 112.66 times 60, or about $8,657. A single truck's actual cost is uncertain, so the 95 percent prediction interval for one truck is about $6,780 to $10,540. James Evans distinguishes this prediction interval for a single observation from the narrower confidence interval for the average of many trucks at the same mileage (Evans, 2020); the budget for one truck should respect the wider one.

What this part is doingSeparating the single-truck interval from the fleet total keeps the budget honest about uncertainty.
4

For the budget, the fleet manager should use the predicted cost for each truck's planned miles and add a contingency based on the standard error. Across 45 trucks, individual errors partly cancel, so the fleet total is more certain than any one truck. Budgeting each truck at its prediction and adding about 5 percent fleet-wide contingency would cover most outcomes.

Recommendation

Budget each truck at 1,897 dollars plus 113 dollars per thousand planned miles, plus a 5 percent fleet contingency. Track actual costs quarterly and add truck age to next year's model, since the oldest trucks sit consistently above the line.

5

References

Anderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., Williams, T. A., Camm, J. D., & Cochran, J. J. (2020). Statistics for business and economics (14th ed.). Cengage.

Evans, J. R. (2020). Business analytics: Methods, models, and decisions (3rd ed.). Pearson.

Levine, D. M., Stephan, D. F., & Szabat, K. A. (2021). Statistics for managers using Microsoft Excel (9th ed.). Pearson.

Reading the GB 513 Unit 8 instructions

GB513 Unit 8 asks you to fit and interpret a simple regression for a business decision. Open with a scatter plot showing the fitted line, equation and R squared, and state the question the model answers. Present the Excel regression output in three trimmed tables: regression statistics, ANOVA and coefficients. Under each table, read the key lines in plain language: what R squared and the standard error mean, what the F test shows, what the slope and its interval mean in business terms and how far to trust the intercept. Check the residual plot and other assumptions, and say what the model leaves out. Produce a prediction for a stated value with a prediction interval, and turn it into a budget or decision. About four pages is typical, with sources cited in APA 7.

How this GB513 Unit 8 example is built

The analysis states Ridgeway Foodservice's budgeting question and shows the scatter plot and equation. Regression statistics give R squared of 0.7612 and a standard error of $913.8, read with Levine, Stephan and Szabat. The ANOVA table gives an F near 137. Coefficients give an intercept of 1,896.9 and a slope of 112.66 with a t of 11.71 and an interval of 93.25 to 132.07, citing Anderson and colleagues on the intercept as an extrapolation, and the highlighted sentence identifies the slope as the budget figure. The residual plot shows no curve and three old trucks above the line. A section checks normality, independence and the 21,600 to 76,400-mile range, and another names truck age and route type as missing. The prediction of about $8,657 has a single-truck interval, distinguished by Evans from a confidence interval, and the budget adds 5 percent fleet contingency.

GB513 Unit 8 rubric: what earns full points

GB513 instructors grade this analysis on reading the output correctly and using it carefully. A scatter plot with the fitted line and equation earns early credit. Each output table should be trimmed and interpreted in plain language beneath it. The slope should be explained in business terms with its interval, and the intercept treated cautiously when it lies outside the data. Residual and assumption checks show the model was tested. Naming missing variables shows understanding of the model's limits. A prediction with a prediction interval, rather than a confidence interval, and a budget built from it carry significant weight. APA 7 citations support reading the output, treating the intercept with care and separating prediction from confidence intervals.

GB513 Unit 8 help from the desk

Many GB513 Unit 8 papers paste the regression output and describe R squared without interpreting the slope in dollars. Others treat the intercept as meaningful when no data lie near zero. A common gap is uncertainty: a single prediction without an interval suggests more precision than the model has. Some writers skip the residual plot. Plot the data and line, trim and read each output table, interpret the slope with its interval, treat the intercept carefully, check residuals and assumptions, name what is missing and predict with an interval before setting a budget.

Get a GB513 Unit 8 example written to your instructions

The dataset your GB513 section assigns for Unit 8, together with its prompt and rubric, is what a custom regression analysis is built on, with the variables and the business question your instructor chose. Expect it in 24 to 48 hours. Your first sample is free, and every output line it cites is interpreted rather than pasted. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More GB513 papers and MBA samples

GB513 Unit 8 questions, answered

Should the regression include the full Excel output?

Include what the interpretation uses and trim the rest. Many GB513 examples keep the regression statistics, ANOVA and coefficients tables but move residual listings to an appendix. The key is that every number shown is explained. Full output pasted with no commentary signals that the software did the analysis and the author did not.

What does R squared actually tell a manager?

It tells the share of the variation in the outcome that the predictor accounts for in this data. An R squared of 0.64 means mileage explains about two thirds of why maintenance costs differ between trucks, and the rest comes from factors not in the model. It says nothing about causation and does not guarantee accurate predictions for new cases.

Is a low R squared a failed regression?

Not necessarily. A slope can be significant and useful even when the model explains a modest share of variation, especially with noisy business data. A finished example says what the low value means for prediction accuracy and whether the relationship still supports the decision. Graders reward that honest reading more than an inflated claim of fit.

Where can I find a free GB513 Unit 8 sample paper?

This page carries a full GB513 Unit 8 simple regression analysis of truck maintenance cost against miles, with trimmed Excel output read in plain language, a prediction interval and APA 7 references.

Why use a prediction interval for one truck?

A prediction interval covers the cost of a single truck, which varies around the line, so it is wider than the confidence interval for the average truck at that mileage. Budgeting one truck needs the wider range.