GB513 Unit 2 Data Summary Analysis Example

Reviewed by Chester Goodwin, MBA Business Analytics Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This GB513 Unit 2 data summary analysis compares delivery lead times from three component suppliers for a composite manufacturer choosing a sole-source supplier. Purdue Global GB 513, Business Analytics, asks MBA students to let variation, not only averages, drive a decision. Thirty deliveries each show nearly equal means of 11.77, 11.89 and 12.37 days, but Supplier B's standard deviation of 1.98 days is nearly twice the others'. Coefficients of variation, side-by-side box plots and the empirical rule translate spread into days of risk, a 16.9-day delivery becomes a z-score of about 2.5, and safety stock is sized at about 90 to 100 housings for Supplier A against 160 for B.

CourseGB513 Business Analytics
UnitUnit 2
Paper typeData summary analysis
LengthAbout 860 words, 6 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramMBA
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for GB513 Unit 2

1

Same Average, Twice the Spread: A Unit 2 Data Summary Analysis of Three Suppliers' Lead Times

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

GB513: Business Analytics

Unit 2 Data Summary Analysis

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The manufacturer, its suppliers and every figure are composite and illustrative; the methods cited are real.

What this part is doingNaming variation as the deciding statistic in the lead shows the analysis looks past the averages.
2

The Question

Tallgrass Equipment assembles agricultural sprayers. One purchased part, a cast pump housing, has no substitute: when it arrives late, the line stops. Purchasing wants to move from three suppliers to one, under a two-year sole-source contract, in exchange for a lower price. The question for Dana Ferris, the purchasing manager, is which supplier to choose. All three meet the price target, so the decision turns on delivery.

The data are the last thirty deliveries from each supplier, measured in days from purchase order to arrival at the dock.

How the Data Were Checked

Before summarizing, each supplier's thirty records were checked for errors. Two of Supplier B's records showed arrival dates before their order dates, a data entry problem in the receiving system; both were corrected against the packing slips. Holiday weeks were kept in, since a sole-source supplier must deliver through them. Each record counts calendar days, so a delivery ordered on a Friday and received the next Friday counts as seven days regardless of weekends.

Comparison Table

Supplier A. Mean 11.77 days; median 11.65; standard deviation 1.13; range 4.5 days, from 9.7 to 14.2; coefficient of variation 0.096.

Supplier B. Mean 11.89 days; median 11.65; standard deviation 1.98; range 9.7 days, from 7.2 to 16.9; coefficient of variation 0.166.

Supplier C. Mean 12.37 days; median 12.10; standard deviation 1.11; range 4.5 days, from 10.2 to 14.7; coefficient of variation 0.090.

Expressing spread as a share of the mean, the coefficient of variation, allows suppliers with different averages to be compared on relative spread (Anderson et al., 2020).

Side-by-Side Box Plots

Box plots for the three suppliers, drawn on the same axis, show boxes of similar position for A and C and a much wider box and whiskers for B. B's median is the same as A's, but its deliveries scatter from a week early to five days late.

Supplier B's average is no worse than the others', but its standard deviation is nearly twice theirs, and for a part that stops the line, the spread is the risk.

What this part is doingThe highlighted sentence states why variation, not the mean, drives the decision.
3

Translating Spread Into Days of Risk

The empirical rule says that for roughly bell-shaped data, about 95 percent of values fall within two standard deviations of the mean (Levine et al., 2021). Applied here:

Supplier A: about 95 percent of deliveries between 9.5 and 14.0 days.

Supplier B: about 95 percent between 7.9 and 15.9 days.

Supplier C: about 95 percent between 10.2 and 14.6 days.

If Tallgrass plans for a fourteen-day lead time, A and C would be late only rarely, while B would be late on a meaningful share of orders.

One Unusual Delivery

B's slowest delivery took 16.9 days. Its z-score, the number of standard deviations from B's mean, is (16.9 minus 11.89) divided by 1.98, or about 2.5. A delivery that far above the mean would be expected in well under 5 percent of orders. Under A's spread, the same 16.9 days would be a z-score of about 4.5, effectively impossible. For B, it is unusual but not surprising, which is the problem: a delivery that late will happen again.

Recommendation

Tallgrass should award the sole-source contract to Supplier A. Its average lead time is the shortest, 11.77 days, and its spread is among the smallest, with a coefficient of variation of 0.096. Supplier C is nearly as consistent but about half a day slower on average. Supplier B, despite a competitive average, is too variable for a part that stops the assembly line.

A Note on Safety Stock

Even with Supplier A, Tallgrass should hold safety stock. Sunil Chopra and Peter Meindl show that safety stock must grow with the variability of supply lead time, not only of demand (Chopra & Meindl, 2019); a simple version covers usage during a chosen number of standard deviations of lead time. With A's standard deviation of 1.13 days, two standard deviations is about 2.3 days. If the line uses about 40 housings a day, a safety stock of about 90 to 100 housings would cover A's late deliveries in nearly all cases. Under B, the same protection would need about 160.

What this part is doingConverting each supplier's spread into housings of safety stock gives the purchasing manager a cost she can compare.
4

What Purchasing Should Ask Supplier A

Before signing, purchasing should ask Supplier A three questions. Can it hold its current spread with all of Tallgrass's volume, roughly three times what it ships now? What caused its longest delivery, 14.2 days, and has that cause been fixed? And will it agree to report each shipment's order and arrival dates monthly, so the contract's performance clause can be checked against the same measure used here?

Limits

Thirty deliveries per supplier is a modest sample, and the empirical rule assumes roughly bell-shaped data, which the box plots suggest but do not prove. Lead times may also change once one supplier receives all the volume. The contract should include a delivery performance clause, reviewed every quarter.

5

References

Anderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., Williams, T. A., Camm, J. D., & Cochran, J. J. (2020). Statistics for business and economics (14th ed.). Cengage.

Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2019). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (7th ed.). Pearson.

Levine, D. M., Stephan, D. F., & Szabat, K. A. (2021). Statistics for managers using Microsoft Excel (9th ed.). Pearson.

Reading the GB 513 Unit 2 instructions

In GB513 Unit 2 you compare several groups and explain what their variation means for a decision. State the business question and why delivery reliability matters. Describe the data and any cleaning you did. Build a comparison table with mean, median, standard deviation, range and coefficient of variation for each group. Add side-by-side box plots on the same axis. Use the empirical rule to turn standard deviations into ranges a manager can plan around, and express one unusual observation as a z-score. Recommend an option, and connect variation to a practical measure such as safety stock. State the limits of your sample. Expect a short report of four or five pages addressed to the person who decides, citing statistics and operations sources in APA 7.

Inside the GB513 Unit 2 example

The analysis states Tallgrass Equipment's need to choose one supplier for a pump housing that stops the line when late. A data check corrects two of Supplier B's records with arrivals before orders. The table gives means, medians, standard deviations of 1.13, 1.98 and 1.11 days, ranges and coefficients of variation of 0.096, 0.166 and 0.090, citing Anderson and colleagues. Box plots show B's wide spread, which the highlighted sentence names as the risk. The empirical rule, from Levine, Stephan and Szabat, gives 95 percent ranges, and B's 16.9-day delivery is a z-score of about 2.5 against 4.5 under A's spread. Supplier A is recommended. Chopra and Meindl support sizing safety stock from lead-time variability, about 90 to 100 housings for A and 160 for B, followed by questions for Supplier A and limits.

GB513 Unit 2 rubric: what earns full points

GB513 rubric credit for this analysis rests on recognizing that spread, not only the mean, decides the choice. Instructors check that the comparison table is accurate and includes relative spread. Box plots on a common axis earn credit because they make differences visible. Applying the empirical rule to turn standard deviations into planning ranges shows understanding. A z-score that places an unusual observation in context shows statistical reasoning. A recommendation tied to the evidence, and a link to a practical cost such as safety stock, shows managerial judgment. Data checks and stated limits show care. APA 7 references cover the coefficient of variation, the empirical rule and the link between lead-time spread and safety stock in Chopra and Meindl.

GB513 Unit 2 help from the desk

Many GB513 Unit 2 papers compare averages and recommend the supplier with the lowest mean, overlooking spread. Others report standard deviations without saying what they mean in days of risk. A frequent gap is the practical link: variation matters because it changes how much inventory or slack a business must carry. Some writers skip data checks. State the question, clean the data, compare center and spread, plot the groups together, translate spread into ranges and z-scores, recommend with evidence and connect variation to a cost the reader manages.

Get a GB513 Unit 2 example written to your instructions

Upload the business file GB513 gave you for Unit 2, with its instructions and rubric. Within 24 to 48 hours a custom summary analysis comes back, organized around the comparison your data supports. Your first request is free, and it keeps the tables-then-meaning layout shown here while using your own groups, measures and scenario. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More GB513 papers and MBA samples

GB513 Unit 2 questions, answered

Should I use the sample or population standard deviation for this analysis?

Almost always the sample version, STDEV.S in Excel, because thirty deliveries or a quarter of sales are a sample from a larger process. The sample says so in a table note. Mixing the two across columns is a common slip, and while the numbers differ only slightly, a grader checking the workbook will usually spot the inconsistency.

What is the coefficient of variation adding that standard deviation does not?

It expresses spread relative to the mean, which lets you compare groups whose averages differ. A standard deviation of three days means more against a five-day average than against a twenty-day one. In a GB513 comparison the coefficient is often the single figure that makes the ranking defensible, so the example explains it in a sentence rather than just reporting it.

Can the recommendation disagree with the numbers?

It can weigh them against something the data leave out, as long as it says so. A strong paper might keep the more variable supplier because of a large price advantage, but it quantifies what that choice risks in days and suggests a buffer. What graders mark down is a recommendation that contradicts the analysis without any explanation.

Where can I find a free GB513 Unit 2 sample paper?

This page carries a full GB513 Unit 2 data summary analysis comparing three suppliers' lead times, with a comparison table, box plots, the empirical rule, a z-score and APA 7 references.

Why reject Supplier B if its average is competitive?

Its standard deviation of 1.98 days is nearly twice the others', so its deliveries range from a week early to five days late. For a part that stops the assembly line, that unpredictability is the risk the contract must avoid.