Studies set against each other inside single paragraphs, each paragraph opening and closing on the author's own point, mark the CM220 Unit 8 source integration draft on math placement. Searches like "cm 220 unit 8 assignment example", "cm220 unit 8 sample" and "cm220 unit 8 example" land here.
What a finished CM220 Unit 8 source integration draft looks like
The draft runs about 1,700 words with introduction, three body sections, the counterargument from Unit 7 and a brief conclusion, plus a reference list of [eight] entries. Its distinguishing feature is synthesis. The first body section places the randomized study, one state report and the college's institutional data in the same paragraph, noting that all three found higher credit-math completion while differing in population and size of gain, and the writer states what the agreement means before any figure appears. The placement-accuracy section sets a research center's finding about misclassified students against the faculty statement's defense of testing and explains which to weigh more and why. Margin comments label each sentence as the writer's reasoning or a source's material, and a closing tally shows reasoning outnumbering borrowed material in every paragraph.
How a CM220 Unit 8 example is structured
Paragraphs follow a pattern that keeps the writer in charge throughout: a claim in the writer's words, sources brought in together where they bear on the same point, a sentence weighing them, and a closing sentence returning to the claim. Sources rarely appear one per paragraph; the draft groups them by what they show rather than by who wrote them. Where sources disagree, the draft names the disagreement and gives a reason for its judgment, such as sample size or independence from the policy's advocates. Quotation is rare, used twice, once for a faculty statement's phrase and once for a student in the news feature. Everything else is paraphrase or summary with APA 7 citations, including narrative citations that put an organization's name in the sentence. A short note to the instructor above the draft lists two places where integration still feels thin.
Three sources, one paragraph
The completion paragraph draws the randomized study, a state report and campus data together. The writer's opening sentence says what they share; the next sentences note how they differ in scale; the last says what that means for the claim.
A disagreement decided with a reason
The research center finds placement tests misclassify many students; the faculty statement defends them. The draft weighs the research more heavily because of its sample size and explains that choice in a sentence.
The writer's sentence first and last
Every body paragraph opens and closes with the writer's reasoning. The margin tally makes that visible: borrowed material never outnumbers the writer's own sentences in any paragraph.
Organized by finding, not by author
No section is built around a single source. Sources appear where their evidence bears on a point, several of them more than once, which is what separates synthesis from sequence.
Thin places named in advance
A short note above the draft flags two paragraphs where integration still leans on one source. Naming them directs the instructor's comments toward the revision the final essay needs.
Where marks go in CM220 Unit 8
Sources taking turns, one per paragraph with the writer silent between them, is the pattern graders mark down hardest. It reports research instead of using it, and rubrics that assess integration directly score it low even when every citation is correct. Synthesis claimed but not performed follows: two sources cited in one sentence with no statement of how they relate. Disagreements between sources left unresolved, or resolved without a reason, draw comment. Paragraphs that end on a source's figure rather than the writer's point lose credit for ownership. Overreliance on one source across several sections weakens the argument's base. Citation errors carry weight at the draft stage in many sections, especially in-text citations that do not match reference entries. A draft that omits the counterargument written earlier is treated as incomplete in most sections.
Get a CM220 Unit 8 example written to your instructions
Your outline, notes on each source and the counterargument drafted earlier give the Unit 8 draft its material; add the CM220 prompt and rubric. A full draft that synthesizes those sources under your claim, with margin comments if they are part of the assignment, comes back in 24-48h. The first custom sample is free.
CM220 Unit 8 questions, answered
What is synthesis, and how is it different from summary?
Summary reports what one source says. Synthesis combines several sources to show a pattern, a disagreement or a gap, and then says what that means for your argument. In CM220, synthesis is usually what separates a researched argument from a report. A paragraph that cites two or more sources and explains their relationship is the typical sign of it.
How much of each paragraph should be my own writing?
There is no fixed ratio, but graders usually expect your reasoning to frame and outweigh the borrowed material. A paragraph that begins and ends with your claim, with sources in between, tends to read as integrated. If a paragraph could be removed without losing any of your reasoning, it is probably summarizing, not arguing.
Will the draft be graded on citations?
In many CM220 sections, yes, though often less heavily than in the final essay. In-text citations need to match reference entries even in draft, since mismatches are easier to fix now than later. Your prompt may describe the draft as graded mainly on integration and argument, with documentation checked more strictly in the following unit.