CM214 · Unit 7

CM214 Unit 7 persuasive speech materials example

Public Speaking for the Professional Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Persuasion enters CM214 as a separate form, and around Unit 7 many sections want the full planning set for a speech that asks an audience to act. The same composite coordinator now faces a harder room, the city council's utilities committee, and argues in these finished materials that the city should pay the homeowner's share of lead line replacement for owner-occupied houses.

What this page holds

Built on Monroe's motivated sequence, this Unit 7 persuasive speech set for CM214 asks a council committee to fund the homeowner's share of lead pipe replacement. Searches like "cm 214 unit 7 assignment example", "cm214 unit 7 sample" and "cm214 unit 7 example" land here.

What a finished CM214 Unit 7 persuasive speech materials looks like

Three documents, one with no counterpart in the Unit 5 set: an attitude analysis precedes the outline, placing each of five committee members on a scale from opposed to supportive by their public votes and naming the objection each is likeliest to raise. The preparation outline follows, about four pages, organized in the five steps of the motivated sequence. Attention opens on a Linden Street homeowner who received a [$4,800] estimate for her side of the line and declined it. Need shows that partial replacement leaves lead pipe in the ground and can briefly raise lead levels. Satisfaction proposes covering the homeowner's portion through a state low-interest loan. Visualization pictures one block in [2030] with and without the program. Action asks for a vote directing staff to apply. APA 7 references close the set.

How a CM214 Unit 7 example is structured

Persuasive prompts in CM214 generally ask for an organizational pattern named in the textbook, and the example labels every section by its step so the pattern can be checked. The attention step is short, one story and one sentence connecting it to the committee's agenda. Need carries the most evidence: the department's tally of lead service lines, a state health department statement on partial replacement, and a cost comparison showing that returning to dig twice costs more than digging once. Satisfaction answers the practical questions a committee asks, source of funds, eligibility and administration, before anyone raises them. Visualization is brief and concrete. Action names one vote and one date. Anticipated objections sit in a separate box after the outline, each paired with the evidence that answers it, and oral citations are written into the outline wherever a source is named aloud.

Where each listener starts

The attitude analysis places five committee members by their recorded votes, from firmly opposed to new spending to already supportive. Two in the middle become the speech's real audience, and the outline says so in a margin note.

One homeowner, then the numbers

Attention uses a single composite resident and her estimate. Need moves quickly to figures: lead lines by block, the cost of a second excavation, the state guidance on partial replacement. The story earns attention; the evidence carries the case.

Funding answered before it is asked

The satisfaction step names the state loan program, the repayment terms in brackets and which homes qualify. A committee's first question is the budget line, and the outline answers it inside the argument rather than in questions afterward.

An objection box

Three likely objections appear after the outline: fairness to renters, landlords benefiting, and future rate increases. Each carries a two-sentence response and its source, ready for the discussion that follows most committee presentations.

An action with a date

The speech ends by asking the committee to direct staff to submit the loan application before the state's [spring] deadline. A request for general support would have been easier to grant and easier to forget.

Where marks go in CM214 Unit 7

Rubrics for persuasion punish hardest the speech that is really an explanation with a recommendation tacked on. A talk that explains lead pipes for five minutes and closes with a sentence saying the city ought to help has argued nothing, and rubrics for this form look for a claim, reasons and a requested action. Ignoring where the audience starts costs nearly as much: evidence aimed at people who already agree, with no response to the cost objection every committee member will hold. Emotional appeal without evidence costs points, as does evidence without any reason for this audience to care. An action step asking for general support rather than a specific decision reads as weak. Reference errors and missing oral citations account for the smaller deductions, as in Unit 5.

Get a CM214 Unit 7 example written to your instructions

For a Unit 7 persuasive set, name the proposal you want to argue, who will hear it and where they stand, then add how long you have and the CM214 prompt with its rubric. Expect an attitude analysis, a full outline in the pattern your section names, and APA 7 references within 24-48h. The first custom sample is on the house.

CM214 Unit 7 questions, answered

Do I have to use Monroe's motivated sequence?

Only if your prompt names it. CM214 textbooks commonly present several persuasive patterns, among them problem-solution, problem-cause-solution and comparative advantages, and many sections let you choose. The motivated sequence suits a request for action, while comparative advantages can fit listeners who already accept the problem. Labeling the steps in the outline lets the grader see which pattern is in use.

Can my persuasive speech use the same topic as my informative one?

Some sections allow it and others require a new topic, so check the instructions. Where the same subject is permitted, the persuasive version needs a genuine question of policy or value, one where informed people disagree. Explaining the same process again with a recommendation attached would repeat the informative speech rather than create a persuasive one.

How much emotional appeal is acceptable?

Most rubrics expect emotion, logic and credibility together, and an appeal to feeling is legitimate when it is accurate and proportionate. A single real or composite example that illustrates a documented problem is common. What costs points is emotion standing in for evidence, or a story that exaggerates what the data show, since graders check whether the pathos matches the logos.