Whole rather than polished: a CM107 Unit 5 first draft carrying the children's-fines argument from introduction to references, with its rough edges still showing. Searches like "cm 107 unit 5 assignment example", "cm107 unit 5 sample" and "cm107 unit 5 example" land here.
What a finished CM107 Unit 5 first draft looks like
About 1,200 words in APA format, with a title page, running prose under whatever headings the section allows, and a reference list of [four] sources. The introduction opens on a composite scene, a nine-year-old at the checkout desk whose card has been blocked, gives two sentences of context and ends with the thesis. Three body paragraphs follow the outline: the blocked card and who it keeps out, fine revenue against the county budget, and a neighboring system that dropped fines and still saw books come back. A counterargument paragraph concedes that fines are meant to teach responsibility and replies with the replacement charge still owed for lost items. The conclusion restates the claim. Rough places remain: the revenue paragraph runs nearly twice the length of the others, and the final sentence reaches toward adult cards.
How a CM107 Unit 5 example is structured
A short draft note sits above the title page in many sections, and the example includes one: three sentences naming what the writer already knows is unfinished, chiefly the long revenue paragraph and two sources still missing page numbers. The essay itself runs seven paragraphs. Introduction and conclusion are each about 120 words; the body paragraphs range from 150 to 280, and the imbalance is left visible rather than hidden. In-text citations appear in author-date form wherever a figure or quotation is used, even where the reference entry is incomplete. Topic sentences match the outline closely enough that a reader holding both documents could follow them side by side. Transitions are functional rather than graceful, often a single phrase. Headings, where the section permits them, mark the introduction, the three reasons, the objection and the conclusion, so an instructor can comment on each part separately.
Every part present, none perfected
Introduction, three reasons, objection, conclusion and references all exist. The draft's value to a grader is that the argument can be read end to end, which a polished opening and a missing second half would never allow.
The outline still legible underneath
Each topic sentence can be matched to its numeral in the Unit 3 outline. Where the draft departs, adding a sentence of context to the revenue paragraph, the change is small and the draft note mentions it.
Citations in place, even if unfinished
Author-date citations sit beside every figure and quotation, including two whose page numbers are marked as missing. Evidence without attribution is a larger problem at this stage than formatting that needs one more pass.
A draft note that names its own gaps
Three sentences above the essay list what is known to be rough. Instructors reading dozens of drafts in a unit often aim their comments at whatever the writer has not already noticed.
A conclusion that overreaches slightly
The final sentence suggests the same reasoning might apply to adult cards. It is a late idea with no support anywhere in the essay, left in the draft as exactly the kind of stray claim that later units exist to catch.
Where marks go in CM107 Unit 5
Incompleteness is the expensive fault at this stage. A polished introduction and two careful paragraphs, with the rest promised for later, is the pattern this unit is built to discourage, and many rubrics award most of their points for a draft that reaches its conclusion. Another is a draft abandoning the outline without explanation, especially one whose thesis has widened along the way. Missing citations cost more than messy ones: a figure about fine revenue with no source behind it is flagged as unsupported, while a reference entry lacking a page number draws only a note. Counterargument paragraphs that concede nothing, dismissing the objection in a sentence, lose points in many sections. Length far under the assigned range signals an unfinished argument. Sentence-level errors carry little weight on a first draft, though heavy ones still slow a reader.
Get a CM107 Unit 5 example written to your instructions
Share the CM107 Unit 5 prompt, the rubric, your outline and your thesis, plus any sources collected so far. A complete first draft following that outline, with in-text citations and a reference list, arrives in 24-48h. The first custom sample is free, and a draft note listing its rough places can be added wherever the section requires it.
CM107 Unit 5 questions, answered
How rough can a first draft be?
Rough in its sentences, not in its shape. Most CM107 instructors accept clumsy transitions and uneven paragraph lengths in a first draft, and many say so in the prompt. What they generally will not accept is a missing section, an absent conclusion or a thesis that has not been written yet. A whole draft with rough prose usually outscores half a polished one.
Do the citations need to be perfect in a first draft?
Not perfect, but present. A grader can forgive an APA entry missing its page range; an unattributed statistic is harder to overlook, since it looks like unsupported evidence. Putting an author and year beside every borrowed idea while drafting spares you the much harder job of reconstructing sources from memory the night before the final essay is due.
Will the draft and the final essay be graded separately?
In many sections, yes: the draft earns its own points and the final essay is graded again later, often with attention to what changed between them. That is why a draft that becomes the final with only commas fixed tends to disappoint. Check your rubric for how the two are weighted, since sections differ widely on this.