Ordered before drafting begins, the Unit 3 essay outline example for CM107 sets three reasons, one objection and a conclusion under a thesis about children's library fines. Searches like "cm 107 unit 3 assignment example", "cm107 unit 3 sample" and "cm107 unit 3 example" land here.
What a finished CM107 Unit 3 essay outline looks like
The outline fills about a page and a half, set in whichever Roman numeral or decimal format the section specifies, and every entry is a complete sentence. Section I holds the introduction: a one-line opening image of a child turned away at the checkout desk, a line of context and the thesis word for word. Sections II through IV each open with a topic sentence followed by lettered support: the [$10] block threshold and what it prevents, fine revenue as a sliver of the county budget, and return rates at systems that dropped fines. Section V states the objection that fines teach responsibility and answers it with the replacement charge that remains for lost books. Section VI restates without adding. A working reference list of [four] sources closes the document, each keyed to the points it supports.
How a CM107 Unit 3 example is structured
Order inside the outline is itself an argument, and the example makes that visible. The strongest reason, what a blocked card costs a child, comes first, so a reader meets the human stake before any numbers. Revenue follows because it is the worry a budget-minded reader raises next, and meeting it early keeps it from hanging over the rest. Evidence from other systems comes third as confirmation. In this version the counterargument sits after all three reasons, just before the conclusion, which is a common placement and one the writer later reconsiders. Under each topic sentence, letters mark evidence and the numbers beneath them mark explanation, so the ratio of proof to comment shows plainly on the page. Transitions are noted in brackets between the numbered sections, a practice some CM107 instructors require at this stage and others leave optional.
Full sentences in every slot
Because each entry is a sentence, a reader can check whether section III argues something or merely names a subject. A two-word label such as fine revenue never reveals which of several paragraphs it might become.
The thesis carried over exactly
Section I repeats the workshop's final version word for word. Any drift between the two documents would surface here, and in this example there is none, so the outline visibly serves the claim already approved.
Evidence keyed to sources
Each lettered point ends with a parenthetical naming the source it will draw on, such as the county budget summary or a newspaper report on a neighboring system. A point with no source beside it stands out immediately as unsupported.
Where the objection sits
The counterargument has its own numeral rather than a line tucked into the conclusion. Its placement is a choice the outline records, and one the final essay changes after peer feedback.
An ending that adds nothing new
Section VI restates the claim and names the one decision the library board would need to make. No fresh evidence or wider proposal appears, which keeps the ending from opening a second argument.
Where marks go in CM107 Unit 3
Topic labels where sentences were requested cost an outline more than anything else: a column reading Introduction, Fines, Money, Other Libraries, Conclusion tells the grader nothing about the argument. Next is the outline whose thesis has quietly widened since the workshop, often by dropping the limit to children's cards without saying so. Missing evidence is common too, with support slots that repeat the topic sentence rather than naming a fact, figure or source. Counterarguments that appear as a single dismissive line cost points in many sections. Some rubrics check parallel formatting, so mixed numbering systems and uneven indentation draw small deductions. A reference list that does not match the sources named in the slots is flagged as inconsistent, since the outline is meant to preview the essay's research exactly.
Get a CM107 Unit 3 example written to your instructions
Share the Unit 3 outline prompt, any template your CM107 instructor posted and the thesis your workshop settled on. An outline built on that thesis, sentence by sentence in the numbering your section uses, returns within 24-48h along with a working reference list. The first custom sample carries no fee.
CM107 Unit 3 questions, answered
Do I need sources in the outline already?
In many sections, yes, at least in working form. The outline is often where an instructor checks that each reason has something behind it before drafting starts. A short list with author, title and year is usually enough at this stage, and some prompts add a sentence under each source saying which point it will support.
Sentence outline or topic outline?
Follow the prompt. Where the choice is open, a sentence outline generally does more work, because each entry already commits to a claim that can be tested against the thesis. Topic outlines are quicker to produce and easier to misread later, since a label like fine revenue could turn into three quite different paragraphs once drafting begins.
Where does the counterargument go in an outline?
Wherever the objection naturally arises, and several placements are defensible. Just before the conclusion is common and safe. Right after the reason it attacks can be stronger, since that is the moment a reader thinks of it. The outline is the cheapest place to try either order before any prose depends on the choice.