In the CM107 Unit 2 thesis workshop shown, one claim passes through four versions, each narrower, with notes on where scope was cut and what the last version commits to proving. Searches like "cm 107 unit 2 assignment example", "cm107 unit 2 sample" and "cm107 unit 2 example" land here.
What a finished CM107 Unit 2 thesis workshop looks like
A finished workshop is short, often two pages, and most of it is a ladder. Version one reads as a topic: public libraries are important. Version two makes a claim, that library fines are unfair, and the annotation beside it asks unfair to whom, and at which library. Version three names the place, the Alder County system, a composite, and proposes ending overdue fines there. Version four limits the proposal to children's cards and adds its reason: a card blocked at [$10] keeps a young reader away far longer than one late picture book is missing from the shelf. Beneath the ladder sit the strongest counterclaim in one sentence, three reasons that later become body paragraphs, and a scope note listing what the essay will leave alone.
How a CM107 Unit 2 example is structured
Most workshop prompts ask for the same parts in roughly this order, and the example follows it. A brief paragraph names the starting topic and why it interested the writer, one sentence of personal connection at most. The ladder follows, formatted as numbered versions with a line or two of annotation under each, so a reader can see the reason for every cut. Next comes the working thesis on its own line, set apart and in bold where the section allows formatting. The counterclaim and the reasons are listed rather than argued, since arguing them belongs to later units. An evidence column pairs each reason with the kind of source that could support it: the county budget for the revenue point, a library association statement for the policy point. The scope note closes the document, followed by a response to the instructor's question wherever the prompt includes one.
A ladder instead of a single answer
The rejected versions are what the workshop grades. A thesis that appears fully formed tells the instructor nothing about whether the writer can narrow a claim, and narrowing is the skill this unit exists to check.
Annotations that name the cut
Each step says what was removed: first every library but one, then adult cards, then any reason the essay could not support in its assigned length. The notes are specific enough that each rung could be rebuilt from the one below it.
A reason carried by because
The final version holds its own reason inside it. A thesis that only proposes leaves the essay with nowhere to go, while one with a because clause already predicts the first body paragraph.
The counterclaim at full strength
Fines build the habit of bringing books back on time, the example concedes, phrased as a parent on the library board might put it rather than as a figure set up to fall. Its presence confirms the thesis is disputable.
A scope note that limits promises
Adult cards, lost-item charges and branch hours are listed as outside the essay. Naming them in advance closes off objections the draft would otherwise have to answer in passing, one sentence at a time.
Where marks go in CM107 Unit 2
A final rung that is still a topic dressed as a claim is where workshops shed the most credit. A sentence such as libraries play a vital role in communities cannot be opposed, so any essay built on it has no argument to make, and graders mark the ladder unfinished. Next is the ladder that narrows by adding words rather than giving up ground: a longer sentence that still covers every library in the country. A counterclaim so weak nobody holds it costs points, since it hides whether the thesis can survive a real objection. Reasons that repeat the thesis in new words get flagged, and a missing scope note, in sections that ask for one, reads as an incomplete submission. Formatting is lightly weighted, though a working thesis buried mid-paragraph usually draws a comment asking where it went.
Get a CM107 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Name the starting topic for your Unit 2 workshop, or the broad claim you already hold, and attach the CM107 prompt with its rubric. The ladder, annotations, counterclaim and scope note are built around that claim and returned in 24-48h. There is no charge for a first custom sample, and your own subject replaces the library entirely.
CM107 Unit 2 questions, answered
How many versions should the ladder have?
Whatever the prompt specifies, and three to five is common. The number matters less than what changes between rungs: each one gives up ground rather than adding adjectives. A ladder that reaches a defensible claim in three honest steps usually scores above one that takes six and ends roughly where it started, still covering too much to prove.
Can I change my thesis after the workshop?
Yes, and most CM107 instructors expect some movement. The workshop fixes a working claim so the outline has something to organize, not a permanent one. When research or drafting shows the claim is still too wide, narrowing it further in a later unit is ordinary, and the revision memo near the end of the term is where that change gets explained.
What if my topic is personal rather than public?
A personal topic can still yield an arguable claim, provided the thesis proposes something another person could reject. A sentence about what a hard year taught you is a reflection; a sentence arguing that employers should offer flexible schedules to parents enrolled in college is a claim. Some sections allow only one of the two, so the prompt settles that before any narrowing begins.