Tested against the proposal's own question, the Unit 6 analysis draft for AC599 classifies every Hollis Creek project cost and computes 186,455 of 2026 amortization. Searches like "ac 599 unit 6 assignment example", "ac599 unit 6 sample" and "ac599 unit 6 example" land here.
What a finished AC599 Unit 6 analysis draft looks like
Seven pages and four exhibits. Exhibit A reports the script's first pass: 574 invoice lines and all time entries classified automatically, 23 lines totaling 131,000 sent to review, and the two uncoded invoices resolved from partner detail that arrived within the plan's deadline. Exhibit B is the classified schedule. Partner fees contribute 1,203,000 to the asset, including 108,000 of project management allocated by hours between development and post-go-live work; internal payroll adds 238,000 for 3,480 development hours; a data conversion utility adds 24,000. Training, data cleansing, post-implementation time and 65,000 of misposted subscription fees stay in expense. Exhibit C computes amortization over the 55 months from June 1, 2026 to the end of the term, 26,636 a month. Exhibit D reports the retracing results and one sensitivity.
How a AC599 Unit 6 example is structured
Exhibits follow the method memo's order, so the two documents can be laid side by side to confirm nothing was improvised. The first-pass results come before any judgment, making clear how much the rules settled alone. The review queue follows line by line, each ambiguous item given the statement-of-work deliverable that decided it; nine lines mixing workshop training with configuration were split by the partner's hours. The classified schedule then totals by cost type and ties to 2,310,000. Amortization is computed next, with the start date justified by module readiness rather than by the contract date. Retracing results appear after the schedule so that the two reclassifications they caused, 9,400 moved to training, are visible as corrections. The sensitivity closes the draft: treating one renewal as reasonably certain would stretch the term to 91 months and cut 2026 amortization to 112,692.
What the rules settled alone
574 of 612 invoice lines and every time entry classified on the first pass. The remainder went to review, and the draft reports that share before any judgment enters.
Twenty-three lines argued one by one
Each ambiguous line is matched to a deliverable. Workshop invoices mixing training with configuration are split by the partner's recorded hours instead of assigned whole.
A schedule that ties to the ledger
Capitalized 1,465,000 and expensed 845,000 sum to the 2,310,000 the proposal started from, with each cost type traceable to its source export.
Amortization from readiness, not signing
The asset begins amortizing on June 1, when the modules went live, over 55 remaining months. Seven months of 2026 give 186,455.
Two errors found and kept visible
Retracing forty lines found two training charges coded as configuration, 9,400 in all. The draft shows the correction rather than folding it silently into totals.
Where marks go in AC599 Unit 6
Analysis drafts that report a capitalized total without the classified schedule behind it ask a reader to trust the script, which graders decline to do. Answering a different question from the proposal's, such as whether the ERP project was worth its cost, is the capstone error most visible here, since the analysis is where a question most easily changes unannounced. Starting amortization at the contract date instead of module readiness misstates 2026 by five months of expense. Treating the misposted subscription fees as implementation costs confuses the hosting service with the work of putting it into use. Corrections applied without comment weaken confidence in every figure nearby. Missing sensitivity on the term, where renewal is a live judgment, and schedules that fail to tie to the ledger draw smaller deductions.
Get a AC599 Unit 6 example written to your instructions
Attach the data your evidence plan confirmed, the method memo you submitted and the Unit 6 prompt with its rubric. Your analysis comes back tested against the question your proposal approved, every classification traceable, the total tied to the ledger and corrections shown where testing found them. First custom sample free; 24-48h is typical.
AC599 Unit 6 questions, answered
Why start amortization in June rather than January, when the subscription began?
Because the guidance begins amortization once a module is ready to be used as planned. At Hollis Creek every phase-one module went live on June 1, so amortization begins then and runs over the 55 months left in the noncancelable term. If your modules went live at different dates, each one starts its own schedule on its own date.
Can internal payroll really be capitalized?
Yes, for staff whose time goes straight into development work. This sample capitalizes 238,000 for 3,480 hours of configuration and testing time, using loaded rates that include benefits and employer taxes but exclude overhead. Time spent attending training, cleaning data or supporting users after go-live stays in expense, since those activities fall outside what the standard allows.
What happens to the 65,000 of subscription fees coded to the project?
They stay in expense but move out of the implementation total. Fees for the hosting service itself are a period cost of the service contract, recognized as incurred, and they belong in the same technology expense line as later subscription payments. The draft reclassifies them so the implementation schedule contains only the work of making the software usable.