The daily override review at Rookwood's three yards fails on three of forty yard-days in this AC557 Unit 6 testing workpaper, its source report tested first. Searches like "ac 557 unit 6 assignment example", "ac557 unit 6 sample" and "ac557 unit 6 example" land here.
What a finished AC557 Unit 6 testing workpaper looks like
Five indexed pages under a header naming entity, period, workpaper reference, control reference and objective, with a sign-off strip whose reviewer half is left open. Page one quotes control C-07 from the design matrix and lists three attributes: timely sign-off, investigation documented for every override above 150 dollars, and use of a complete, correctly run override report, with a system sign-off no later than 10 a.m. on the following business day. Page two tests the report: parameters reperformed for four selected days and ticket counts agreed to the ticket register. Page three is the results grid, forty rows with a tickmark per attribute. Three exceptions appear: two Harbor Road days signed the following Monday, and a Kiln Street override of 1,872 dollars marked reviewed with no reason recorded. Page four concludes.
How a AC557 Unit 6 example is structured
The workpaper is built to be re-performed rather than trusted, so every tickmark is defined in a legend and every exception is described with the ticket numbers, dates and screens involved. The source report is tested before the sample, because an override review conducted on an incomplete report proves nothing about the overrides missing from it; the reperformed parameters and agreed counts sit on their own page. Results are recorded attribute by attribute, never as a single pass or fail per day. Each exception is investigated for cause: the two late sign-offs trace to a controller who works Monday to Friday while the yard opens Saturdays, and the unexplained override traces to a yard manager's PIN. The conclusion states the deviation count against the zero tolerated, declines to extend the sample, and refers the result onward by reference.
Control C-07, quoted
The design matrix wording reproduced exactly, with its three attributes listed beneath so each tickmark answers to one sentence of the control.
The report tested first
Parameters reperformed for four days and ticket counts agreed to the register, showing that the override report the controller used was complete and correctly run.
Forty rows, three tickmarks each
Sign-off timing, investigation of overrides above 150 dollars, and report integrity, recorded separately for every sampled yard-day.
Three exceptions, three causes
A Friday and a Saturday signed on Monday by a weekday-only controller; a 1,872-dollar copper upgrade closed without any reason under a yard manager's PIN.
Not effective, and why no extension
Three deviations against zero tolerated cannot be rescued by a larger sample, so the workpaper concludes and passes the matter to the deficiency memo.
Where marks go in AC557 Unit 6
Workpapers recording a single pass or fail per item, with no attribute detail, are marked down early because nobody reviewing them can tell what was examined. Graders look next for the report behind the review: skipping its completeness and accuracy leaves every clean result open to doubt. Exceptions listed without cause, or explained away as isolated, attract comment, since cause decides whether a problem is timing or intent. Extending a sample after three deviations, hoping to dilute them, misreads how deviation tolerance works. Tickmarks without a legend, and results that cannot be traced to ticket numbers, fail the reviewability the unit is about. A preparer who fills in the reviewer's sign-off loses documentation credit almost everywhere, and so does a conclusion that never refers the finding onward.
Get a AC557 Unit 6 example written to your instructions
Supply the control your Unit 6 prompt tests, the results or population data the case gives, any workpaper format the section expects, and the rubric. Attributes are recorded item by item and exceptions traced to cause, with the reviewer line left for someone else. Turnaround is 24-48h, free for a first custom workpaper.
AC557 Unit 6 questions, answered
Why test the override report before the sample?
Because the controller's review can only be as complete as the report being reviewed. If the report dropped some overrides, a perfect review of it would still miss them. Testing the report's parameters and agreeing its counts to the ticket register gives the sample something solid to stand on, and the workpaper keeps that evidence on its own page.
Could a bigger sample have rescued the control?
Not with three deviations. Plans that tolerate zero deviations sometimes allow a single deviation to be reconsidered with an extended sample, but three indicate the control is not operating as designed. The workpaper says so directly instead of drawing more days in the hope of diluting the rate, and it explains that reasoning in two sentences.
Who should sign the reviewer line?
Someone other than the preparer, after reviewing the work. The sample leaves the reviewer half of the sign-off strip empty, because a reviewer's initials entered by the preparer would misrepresent what happened. In a course setting, the instructor or a named classmate may play that role, and the workpaper shows where their sign-off would go.