Imaging through write blockers, hash values that agree at acquisition and verification, and a logged clock offset make up this AC468 Unit 2 acquisition record for three evidence items. Searches like "ac 468 unit 2 assignment example", "ac468 unit 2 sample" and "ac468 unit 2 example" land here.
What a finished AC468 Unit 2 acquisition record looks like
Four pages in a fixed format, one section per item. Item 1 is the accounts payable lead's laptop, received powered off with a custody form signed by the IT manager on April 3; the record gives make, model and serial numbers, photographs and the BitLocker status. Its NVMe drive was removed, connected through a hardware write blocker and imaged in its encrypted state to E01 format, with the escrowed recovery key recorded for use during analysis. SHA-256 and MD5 values computed during acquisition match those computed from the finished image. Item 2, a 32 GB flash drive from the desk drawer, follows the same pattern through a USB write blocker. Item 3, the mailbox, is a logical export from the company's eDiscovery console, hashed on download. The laptop's firmware clock ran 2 minutes 14 seconds slow.
How a AC468 Unit 2 example is structured
Items are recorded in the order acquired, and each section follows the same sequence so a reader can compare them: receipt and custody, description and photographs, condition, method, tool and version, hash values, and verification. The laptop section explains why the drive was removed rather than imaged through the running system: booting Windows would write to the disk and move timestamps the later units depend on. BitLocker is handled plainly, with the recovery key's source and the time it was retrieved, and the image is taken in its encrypted state so that nothing on the original was unlocked in place. The clock check is recorded with its reference source, since every timeline built later inherits that offset. The mailbox section states what a logical export cannot capture, such as items purged before the hold. A final page lists deviations from the lab's written procedure, of which there is one.
Received powered off, and recorded so
The IT manager's custody form states the laptop was shut down on April 3 and not opened since. The record attaches that form and notes that the claim rests on his word alone.
A drive removed, not booted
Starting Windows would write logs and update timestamps on the original. The NVMe drive was taken out and read through a hardware write blocker that passes no write commands to the device.
Encrypted when imaged
The drive was imaged in its BitLocker-encrypted state. The recovery key, retrieved from directory escrow by IT with the examiner present, is recorded by identifier for decryption during analysis.
Two values, twice
SHA-256 and MD5 hashes computed as the drive was read match those computed from the completed image. The record prints both pairs and the time each was taken.
A clock two minutes slow
Checked in firmware setup with the drive removed, the laptop's clock read 2 minutes 14 seconds behind a network time reference. Later timelines inherit this figure.
Where marks go in AC468 Unit 2
Graders read an acquisition record as a court would, looking for the step that cannot be proved. A record with no write blocker, or with a live examination of the original, undoes everything after it, and that omission tends to cost more than any other. Hash values reported once, with no verification value beside them, prove where the image started and nothing about whether it survived. Encryption mishandled is a newer source of deductions: unlocking the original drive in place, or omitting where the recovery key came from, leaves a gap opposing counsel would use. Missing tool names and versions make the process impossible to repeat. The clock check is often skipped, and its absence surfaces later when a timeline cannot explain an offset. Hiding a deviation from procedure costs more than stating and explaining it.
Get a AC468 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Device details, the tools a section names and any required custody or imaging form shape a Unit 2 record more than anything else; send them with the lab scenario and the rubric. Each item is documented from receipt to verification, with hashes paired and deviations stated. First custom record at no charge, returned inside 24-48h.
AC468 Unit 2 questions, answered
What does a write blocker actually do?
It sits between the evidence drive and the examiner's computer and allows read commands through while blocking any command that would change the drive. Without one, simply connecting a drive to a Windows machine can write to it. The record names the blocker used and states that it was tested before use, which most rubrics expect.
Why image an encrypted drive without unlocking it first?
Because unlocking the original in place means interacting with it in ways that are harder to document and could alter it. Imaging the encrypted drive preserves it exactly, and the recovery key is applied to the image during examination. The record states where the key came from and who retrieved it, since that step is part of custody.
Can the record follow my section's lab exercise?
Yes. Include the lab scenario, the details of any practice image, the tools your section uses and the rubric. The record documents each item in the order your facts give, pairs acquisition and verification hashes, and states every deviation from procedure, with places left for values that only your own lab run will produce.