AC450 · Unit 6

AC450 Unit 6 fixed asset transfer entries example

Advanced Accounting Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

A five-axis milling machine that cost the parent 500,000 and carried 260,000 of book value moved to the glassworks on January 1, 2027 for 360,000. AC450's Unit 6 problem is usually built around a transfer of this kind. The fixed asset transfer entries remove the 100,000 gain, restore the machine's original cost and accumulated depreciation, and then unwind the gain 20,000 a year across five years.

What this page holds

For 2027 and 2028, the AC450 Unit 6 fixed asset transfer entries take a 100,000 downstream gain on a milling machine out of group income and release it through depreciation. Searches like "ac 450 unit 6 assignment example", "ac450 unit 6 sample" and "ac450 unit 6 example" land here.

What a finished AC450 Unit 6 fixed asset transfer entries looks like

Two years of entries, a five-row schedule of the unrealized gain, and a paragraph on what changes if the machine had gone the other way. The 2027 set has two entries. TA debits the 100,000 gain and debits equipment 140,000, lifting the machine from the glassworks' 360,000 back to the group's 500,000 cost, and credits accumulated depreciation 240,000 so the group shows the machine as it always stood. ED credits depreciation expense 20,000, the gap between the glassworks' 72,000 a year and the 52,000 the group would have charged on 260,000. The 2028 set repeats both, except that the gain is gone from the income statement and 80,000 of it is charged to the parent's opening retained earnings instead. The schedule shows the remaining deferral falling to zero by the end of 2031.

How a AC450 Unit 6 example is structured

Year of transfer first, following year second, remaining life last. A short paragraph first establishes that the parent sold and the glassworks bought, so the gain sits in the parent's income and the family's interest is untouched. The 2027 entries come next, each with its purpose written beside it: TA makes the machine look as if it never moved, and ED corrects the extra depreciation the glassworks charges on a cost the group never paid. The 2028 entries follow and are introduced by the question this kind of problem turns on, where last year's gain went. The answer is retained earnings, reduced by the one year of excess depreciation already reversed, which is why *TA debits 80,000 rather than 100,000. The schedule then runs to 2031, and the closing paragraph reruns 2027 upstream, where 16,000 of the 80,000 year-end deferral would fall on the family.

A downstream sale, stated once

The parent sold, so the 100,000 gain was recorded in the parent's books. The family's 20 percent interest in the glassworks is unaffected, and the paragraph says why in two sentences.

Putting the machine back at cost

Entry TA removes the gain, raises equipment from 360,000 to 500,000 and restores 240,000 of accumulated depreciation, so the consolidated asset matches what the group has carried since the machine was bought.

Depreciation on a price the group never paid

The glassworks charges 72,000 a year on 360,000 over five years. The group basis of 260,000 supports 52,000, so entry ED reverses 20,000 annually.

The second year, through retained earnings

In 2028 the gain is no longer in income. Entry *TA debits the parent's opening retained earnings 80,000, the gain less one year of reversed depreciation, and credits accumulated depreciation 220,000.

Five rows to zero

Deferred gain at each year end: 80,000, 60,000, 40,000, 20,000, none. The schedule proves that the reversal is complete by the end of 2031, when the machine's remaining life runs out.

Where marks go in AC450 Unit 6

Second-year entries separate strong submissions from the rest. Debiting the full 100,000 to retained earnings in 2028, forgetting that 20,000 was already reversed through depreciation, leaves consolidated equity 20,000 low and accumulated depreciation 20,000 high. Charging that debit to the glassworks' retained earnings, as if the sale had run upstream, pulls the family into a transaction it had no part in. Removing the gain against equipment alone, with nothing restored to cost or accumulated depreciation, shows the machine at a net 260,000 that is right in total and wrong in both of its lines. Omitting ED is common and costs the depreciation line. The reason beside each entry is read too, and TA and ED written as bare debits and credits usually earn less than the same entries explained.

Get a AC450 Unit 6 example written to your instructions

Which company sold, and when? Those two answers set the direction and the first year, so put them at the top, followed by the seller's cost, accumulated depreciation, price and remaining life, then the rubric. Every requested year returns entered and explained within 24-48h, deferral schedule included, and a first custom set is free.

AC450 Unit 6 questions, answered

Why restore accumulated depreciation instead of just removing the gain?

Because the consolidated balance sheet should show the machine exactly as the group has always held it: 500,000 of cost and the depreciation built up on that cost. Removing the gain against equipment alone gets the net figure right but misstates both lines, and anyone checking the property note would see the machine carried at a cost nobody in the group paid.

What if the transferred asset is land?

Land is not depreciated, so no part of the gain is released through depreciation. The deferral stays on the worksheet every year until the buyer sells the land to someone outside the group, when the gain is finally realized. The entries are simpler, but they repeat unchanged for as long as the land stays inside the group, which some problems test over several years.

Can the entries be built on my own problem's transfer?

Yes. Send the asset's cost, accumulated depreciation and transfer price, the remaining life, the date, which company sold, and what share of the subsidiary the parent owns, with the rubric. The sample returns entries for every year the problem asks about, a deferral schedule, and a noncontrolling interest computation whenever the sale ran upstream.