| Course | AC444 Accounting Visualization and Business Intelligence |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 10 |
| Paper type | Executive briefing deck |
| Length | About 590 words, 5 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Accounting |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for AC444 Unit 10
Seven Slides, No New Charts: A Unit 10 Executive Briefing Deck to Move $180,000 From Mosquito to Commercial Selling
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
AC444: Accounting Visualization and Business Intelligence
Unit 10 Executive Briefing Deck
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Ashgrove Pest Control, its owners and every figure are composite; the books cited are real.
Slide 1: The Recommendation
Headline: "Move $180,000 of spring promotion to commercial selling at Harbor and Midland." Two figures beneath: about $121,000 of added gross margin a year, against about $61,000 from the same spend on mosquito promotion.
Speaker notes: Open with the ask and the payoff, then say that every chart that follows has already been reconciled to the books. Name the decision: approve the shift for one season, with a test at June 30.
Slide 2: Revenue Grows on Price While Accounts Fall
The Unit 5 trend view: trailing-twelve revenue rising to $9.32 million while residential accounts fall to 13,980.
Speaker notes: Growth is real but depends on price increases. Residential volume has fallen for three years, so adding mosquito customers, who come and go each season, does not fix the base.
Slide 3: Commercial Margin Differs by Branch
The Unit 6 branch view: commercial margin of 58 percent at Harbor and 55 at Midland, against 33 at Summit.
Speaker notes: The company average of 47.7 percent hides a 25-point spread. The recommendation targets the two branches where commercial work already earns the most.
Slide 4: Per Technician Hour, Those Segments Lead
The Unit 6 dot plot: commercial at Harbor $87.90 and Midland $81.00 per route hour, mosquito $26.90.
Speaker notes: Technician time is the constraint. An hour of commercial work at these two branches earns more than three hours of mosquito work.
The case for the shift is that it moves scarce technician hours from Ashgrove's least productive segment to its two most productive, which the owners can verify on a chart they have already seen reconciled to the ledger.
Slide 5: The Capacity Objection
The Unit 7 utilization chart: Harbor at 96 percent and Midland at 93 percent of available hours.
Speaker notes: Owners will ask where the hours come from. Forgoing the mosquito promotion frees about 730 summer route hours at these two branches. The commercial contracts need about 1,440 hours a year, spread evenly, about 120 a month across both branches; one technician hired at Harbor in March covers the rest.
Slide 6: Two Uses of the Same Money
A two-row table from the Unit 6 and Unit 9 figures. Mosquito promotion: about $210,000 of revenue at 29 percent, $61,000 of gross margin, 2,270 route hours concentrated in summer. Commercial selling: 46 contracts, about $215,000 of revenue at 56 percent, $121,000 of gross margin, 1,440 route hours through the year.
Speaker notes: The revenue is similar; the margin and the timing are not.
Slide 7: Risk and the Test
The risk is that commercial contracts sign more slowly than projected. The test: if fewer than twenty contracts are signed by June 30, the remaining budget returns to mosquito promotion for the late season.
Speaker notes: Ask the owners to agree now on what would prove the shift wrong.
Appendix
Three slides: the Unit 9 reconciliation of revenue to the ledger, the measure definitions from Unit 4, and the contract projection's assumptions. A deck that adds no new charts lets the audience trust each view because it has already been tested (Knaflic, 2015), and one claim per slide keeps an executive audience on the decision (Few, 2012).
References
Few, S. (2012). Show me the numbers: Designing tables and graphs to enlighten (2nd ed.). Analytics Press.
Knaflic, C. N. (2015). Storytelling with data: A data visualization guide for business professionals. Wiley.
Reading the AC 444 Unit 10 instructions
The final AC444 unit asks you to present a recommendation to executives using only views you built and reconciled earlier. Open with the recommendation and its payoff on the first slide. Give each following slide one claim and one existing view that supports it, and order the slides as an argument: the problem, the opportunity, the evidence, the objection and the comparison. Anticipate the strongest objection and answer it with a view. Compare the alternative uses of the resource directly. Close with the main risk and a measurable condition that would reverse the decision, agreed in advance. Write speaker notes for each slide: the claim, the chart feature that supports it and the question an executive is likely to ask. Put reconciliations and definitions in an appendix. Add no new analysis. Cite visualization and presentation sources in APA 7.
Inside the AC444 Unit 10 example
The sample's first slide asks to move $180,000 to commercial selling at two branches and gives the $121,000 and $61,000 comparison. Slide 2 reuses the trend view, slide 3 the branch margin split, slide 4 the margin-per-hour dot plot. The highlighted sentence states the deck's argument: moving scarce technician hours from the least productive segment to the two most productive. Slide 5 answers the capacity objection with 96 and 93 percent utilization, 730 freed summer hours and one hire. Slide 6 compares revenue, margin and hours for both uses. Slide 7 sets the June 30 test of twenty contracts. Speaker notes sit under each slide. The appendix holds the revenue reconciliation, measure definitions and projection assumptions, citing Knaflic and Few.
AC444 Unit 10 rubric: what earns full points
AC444 briefing decks are graded on whether the term's views carry the recommendation without new analysis, and on how well the deck anticipates its audience. The recommendation and payoff should appear first. Each slide should make one claim supported by one view, in an order that builds an argument. Graders look for the strongest objection answered with evidence rather than assertion. A direct comparison of alternatives helps executives decide. A reversal condition agreed in advance turns approval into a test and shows the presenter expects scrutiny. Speaker notes should be brief and specific. The appendix should let a reviewer trace every figure to its reconciliation. A consistent visual style and APA 7 citations finish the Purdue Global grade for the term's closing unit.
AC444 Unit 10 help: mistakes that cost points
Many Unit 10 decks introduce a new chart on a late slide that has never been checked against the ledger. Others put the recommendation at the end. Slides carry several charts and several claims each. The capacity or cost objection is ignored until an executive raises it. Alternatives are not compared. The risk slide is generic and offers no measure that would reverse the decision. Speaker notes repeat the slide text. If your term's views concern a hospital department, a retailer or a nonprofit, our writers can build the deck and notes from your own reconciled work.
Get an AC444 Unit 10 example written to your instructions
The views you built this term, the audience named in the Unit 10 instructions, the decision on the table and the rubric are what this deck needs. Slides with claim headlines and speaker notes are assembled from those views and returned within 24-48h. A first custom sample carries no charge. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More AC444 papers and BS in Accounting samples
- AC444 Unit 1: Misleading Chart Discussion Post
- AC444 Unit 2: Investor Chart Critique
- AC444 Unit 3: Single View Build
- AC444 Unit 4: Star Schema Data Model
- AC444 Unit 5: Seasonal Trend Visualization
- AC444 Unit 6: Segment Comparison View Set
- AC444 Unit 7: Operations Dashboard Build
- AC444 Unit 8: Stacked Chart Seminar Reflection
- AC444 Unit 9: Dashboard Reconciliation Worksheet
- AC442 Unit 10: Data Analysis Brief
- AC430 Unit 10: Corporate Liquidation Problem
- AC420 Unit 10: Transfer Pricing Analysis
- AC410 Unit 10: Qualified Audit Report
AC444 Unit 10 questions, answered
Why can the deck not include new analysis?
Because the closing unit tests whether the term's views can carry a decision on their own. A new chart on slide six has not been reconciled or critiqued the way earlier views were, so it weakens the case rather than adding to it. The sample reuses four earlier views and puts the proof of their figures in the appendix.
How are the speaker notes written?
As what the presenter would say in about thirty seconds per slide: the claim, the one feature of the chart that supports it, and the question an owner is likely to ask. Notes run near 80 words each in the sample. Sections requiring a recorded presentation usually treat the notes as the script, so they are written to be spoken aloud.
What makes the reversal condition useful?
It turns approval into a test. Owners agreeing to redirect the budget also agree on what would prove the shift wrong, fewer than twenty contracts signed by June 30, and what happens then. That lowers the risk of approving and shows the presenter expects to be checked, which strengthens a recommendation in front of an executive audience.
Where can I find a free AC444 Unit 10 sample paper?
This page holds a complete AC444 Unit 10 executive briefing deck for a composite pest control company, with seven slides built from earlier views, speaker notes, an appendix and APA 7 references.
How does the AC444 Unit 10 deck answer the capacity objection?
With the utilization view: Harbor and Midland are at 96 and 93 percent, but dropping the mosquito promotion frees about 730 summer route hours there, and one technician hired at Harbor covers the rest of the 1,440 hours.