| Course | AC442 Data Management and Analysis |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 5 |
| Paper type | Query writing problem |
| Length | About 570 words, 5 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Accounting |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for AC442 Unit 5
Six Journal Entry Tests on 52,630 Ledger Lines: A Unit 5 Query Writing Problem With Counts and Dollars
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
AC442: Data Management and Analysis
Unit 5 Query Writing Problem
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Cobble Hill Estate Winery, its ledger and every result are composite; the guide, standard and article cited are real; queries are written in PostgreSQL with equivalents named.
The Table
gl_line: line_id, je_number, post_date, period_end, account_no, amount, source_code (AUTO for system feeds, MAN for manual), entered_by, line_desc. Fiscal year 2025, 52,630 rows.
Problem 1: Manual Entries
Question: how many lines were keyed by hand?
SELECT COUNT(*), SUM(ABS(amount)) FROM gl_line WHERE source_code = 'MAN';
Result: 1,214 lines, $3,962,480 in absolute value. Manual lines are only 2.3 percent of the ledger but carry the judgment, which is why the analytics guide points auditors to them first (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 2017). The fraud standard goes further and requires auditors to examine whether ledger entries were proper, looking hardest at those made outside the ordinary flow of business (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 2023).
Problem 2: Manual Entries on Weekends
SELECT je_number, post_date, entered_by, amount FROM gl_line WHERE source_code = 'MAN' AND EXTRACT(DOW FROM post_date) IN (0, 6);
Result: 38 lines, $186,420. EXTRACT(DOW ...) returns 0 for Sunday and 6 for Saturday in PostgreSQL; SQL Server uses DATEPART(weekday, post_date), whose numbering depends on a server setting. Thirty-one of the lines fall on the two Saturdays after quarter ends, consistent with the controller finishing the close.
Problem 3: Round Amounts
SELECT je_number, account_no, amount FROM gl_line WHERE source_code = 'MAN' AND ABS(amount) >= 5000 AND MOD(ABS(amount), 1000) = 0;
Result: 22 lines, $214,000. A round figure can be a legitimate estimate, such as an accrual for an audit fee, but invented entries also tend to be round.
Problem 4: Blank Descriptions, Twice
First version: WHERE line_desc = '' returns 44 lines. Second version: WHERE line_desc IS NULL OR TRIM(line_desc) = '' returns 61 lines.
The first query missed 17 lines because a null is not equal to anything, even an empty string, and descriptions holding only spaces fail an equality test too, so a blank-field test that ignores both understates the problem it is looking for.
Total of the 61 lines: $97,315.
Problem 5: Late Postings
SELECT je_number, post_date, period_end, amount FROM gl_line WHERE post_date > period_end + INTERVAL '10 days';
Result: 96 lines, $412,760. Most are year-end adjustments posted in January. Late postings matter because they can move results between periods after managers have seen them. The ten-day window is a judgment; the close calendar allows eight working days, and a reviewer could tighten it.
Problem 6: Who Posted to Revenue
SELECT entered_by, COUNT(*), SUM(amount) FROM gl_line WHERE account_no BETWEEN 4000 AND 4999 AND source_code = 'MAN' GROUP BY entered_by;
Result: three users, 41 lines. The bookkeeper posted 33, the controller 6, and the tasting room manager 2, worth negative $612.40. The manager has no reason to post to revenue directly, and her access should be reviewed.
What the Counts Establish
Every result is paired with a dollar total because accounting judgments turn on amounts. None of the flagged lines is evidence of an error by itself; each is a list for follow-up. Research on journal entry data has found that combinations of such attributes, rather than any single test, are most useful in focusing review (Debreceny & Gray, 2010).
References
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2017). Guide to audit data analytics. AICPA.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2023). AU-C section 240: Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. In AICPA professional standards. AICPA.
Debreceny, R. S., & Gray, G. L. (2010). Data mining journal entries for fraud detection: An exploratory study. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 11(3), 157-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2010.08.001
The Purdue Global AC442 Unit 5 instructions
The fifth AC442 unit asks you to write queries against one table and report what each returns. For each problem, state the question in business terms, write the finished SELECT statement, and report the row count and a dollar total, since accounting judgments turn on amounts. Use filters a reviewer would recognize: source codes, posting dates, round amounts, blank fields, late postings and users. Handle nulls and spaces deliberately, because a blank-field test that ignores them undercounts. Where a function differs between database products, such as day of week, name the version you used and its equivalent. After each result, write one sentence on what the rows can establish and what they cannot, since a flag is a reason to look, not a finding. Cite the audit analytics guide, the fraud standard and research on journal entry testing in APA 7.
Inside the AC442 Unit 5 example
The sample describes the gl_line table and its columns. Problem 1 counts 1,214 manual lines worth $3,962,480 and cites the AICPA analytics guide and AU-C 240. Problem 2 finds 38 weekend lines worth $186,420, notes the PostgreSQL and SQL Server day-of-week functions, and explains most as close work. Problem 3 returns 22 round lines worth $214,000. Problem 4 compares an equality test finding 44 blank descriptions with a version adding nulls and trimming spaces that finds 61; the highlighted sentence explains the gap of 17. Problem 5 finds 96 late lines worth $412,760 and defends the ten-day window. Problem 6 groups revenue postings by user and flags the tasting room manager's two lines. A closing paragraph cites Debreceny and Gray on combining tests.
Where the points sit in the AC442 Unit 5 rubric
AC442 query problems are graded on correct syntax, correct results and sound interpretation. Each query must answer the question as asked, and filters should be precise enough that a reviewer could rerun them. Graders reward handling of nulls and whitespace, since tests that miss them produce confident but wrong counts. Pairing every row count with a dollar total shows accounting judgment. Interpretation matters as much as the query: each result should state its reach and its limits, because flagged rows are leads, not errors. Naming database-specific functions and their equivalents shows awareness that SQL varies. Connecting the tests to auditing standards explains why they are run. Readable queries and APA 7 citations to the standards and research finish the marks in this Purdue Global unit.
AC442 Unit 5 help: mistakes that cost points
Many Unit 5 answers report a row count and nothing else, leaving the reader unable to judge whether the finding matters. Blank-field tests use equality alone and miss nulls and spaces. Weekend tests use a function from one product while the course uses another. Round-amount tests check only for zeros at the end of a text field. Flagged entries are described as fraud. Queries return every column, burying the ones that matter. If your section uses a different table or dialect, such as SQL Server or Access, our writers can build the tests and the interpretations on your own data.
Get an AC442 Unit 5 example written to your instructions
Send the Unit 5 problem list, the table definition or database file your instructor supplies, and the rubric. Each query comes back written against those columns with its row count, dollar total and a sentence on what it supports, inside 24-48h, and a first custom sample costs nothing. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More AC442 papers and BS in Accounting samples
- AC442 Unit 1: Accounting Data Map Discussion Post
- AC442 Unit 2: Business Process Description
- AC442 Unit 3: REA Entity Relationship Diagram
- AC442 Unit 4: Normalized Table Design
- AC442 Unit 6: Multi-table Join Exercise
- AC442 Unit 7: Data Quality Worksheet
- AC442 Unit 8: Seminar Reflection
- AC442 Unit 9: Summary Query Set
- AC442 Unit 10: Analysis Brief
- AC430 Unit 5: Corporate Distribution Problem
- AC420 Unit 5: Activity-Based Costing Comparison
- AC410 Unit 5: Audit Program Draft
- AC314 Unit 5: Expenditure Cycle Analysis
AC442 Unit 5 questions, answered
Why pair every row count with a dollar total?
Because accounting judgments turn on amounts. Thirty-eight weekend postings could total a few hundred dollars or several hundred thousand, and the finding changes completely between the two. Reporting both lets a reader weigh the result without rerunning anything, and AC442 rubrics typically expect the count at minimum, so adding the sum costs nothing and strengthens the answer.
Does a flagged entry mean something went wrong?
No, and the sample says so after each result. A manual entry posted on a Saturday may be a controller finishing the close, and a round-thousand amount may be an accrual estimate. The query identifies lines worth examining; supporting documents decide whether any of them is a problem, which is work beyond a single-table filter.
Which SQL dialect does the sample use?
Standard SQL where possible, with any product-specific function noted. The weekend test, for instance, needs a day-of-week function whose name differs between database products, so the sample shows the version for the product your section uses and names the equivalent. Send your section's platform and the queries are written to run on it directly.
Where can I find a free AC442 Unit 5 sample paper?
This page holds a complete AC442 Unit 5 query writing problem with six journal entry tests on a composite winery's ledger, each with a query, row count, dollar total, interpretation and APA 7 references.
Why did the AC442 Unit 5 blank test find 44 and then 61 lines?
An equality test against an empty string misses nulls, which are not equal to anything, and descriptions holding only spaces. Adding IS NULL and trimming spaces found the other 17 lines.