| Course | AC314 Accounting Information Systems and Enterprise Risk Management |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 10 |
| Paper type | Systems recommendation report |
| Length | About 770 words, 5 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Accounting |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for AC314 Unit 10
Twenty-Two Tablets and What They Buy: A Unit 10 Systems Recommendation Report for a Wholesale Nursery
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
AC314: Accounting Information Systems and Enterprise Risk Management
Unit 10 Systems Recommendation Report
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Stillbrook Nursery, its owners, vendors and every figure are composite; the textbook, framework and criteria cited are real.
Header
To: Owners, Stillbrook Nursery From: Accounting systems team Date: January 20 Subject: Recommendation on delivery capture before the spring shipping season
Summary
We recommend equipping each delivery truck with a tablet running a proof-of-delivery app integrated with the enterprise system. First-year cost is $70,680 and recurring cost $15,880 a year. Measurable benefits of about $93,300 a year repay the first-year cost in roughly nine months, and the system also supplies the store-level delivery counts needed to explain plants that disappear at the chain's stores.
The Problem
Earlier analysis found three weaknesses at the point of delivery. Signed delivery tickets worth $41,300 were never invoiced last year because nothing marked them delivered in the system. Dead-plant credits in May and June ran $130,000 above the prior year, most with no photograph or returned plants behind them. And $450,000 of plants delivered to chain stores were never scanned or explained, because delivery counts by store never reached a file that could be matched to the chain's scans.
Alternatives
1. A second billing clerk. Cost: about $52,000 a year in wages and benefits. Fixes: unbilled tickets, through manual follow-up. Does not fix: unsupported credits or chain matching.
2. Tablets with a proof-of-delivery app. First year: 22 tablets at $640, $14,080; rugged cases and mounts, $2,420; app licenses at $45 a month each, $11,880; integration build, $34,000; training, $5,300; contingency, $3,000; total $70,680. Recurring: licenses, $11,880; device management, $2,112; support, $1,888; total $15,880. Fixes: all three weaknesses, by capturing signature, photo, time and location at delivery and marking the ticket delivered instantly.
3. An enterprise system upgrade with its own mobile module. First year: about $238,000; recurring about $41,000. Fixes: all three, plus warehouse functions Stillbrook does not need yet.
Recommendation
Alternative 2 fixes every weakness the cycle analyses found, at less than a third of the upgrade's cost, and unlike a second clerk it captures the delivery at the moment it happens, which is the control the problem was missing all along.
Benefits counted: $41,300 of tickets no longer missed, and a reduction of at least 40 percent in unsupported credits, $52,000, for $93,300 a year. Not counted: any recovery of the $450,000 chain shrink, which depends on negotiating with the chain once Stillbrook has the evidence.
Controls the New System Needs
1. Device management with remote wipe, so a lost tablet exposes no customer data.
2. Role-based access: drivers capture deliveries but cannot edit prices or issue credits.
3. Proof-of-delivery records that cannot be edited after submission, stamped with time and location.
4. An offline mode that stores deliveries when there is no signal, with a count on each sync of records captured against records received, the lesson of December's outage.
5. A daily exception report of tickets printed but not marked delivered.
6. Change management for the integration: tested changes, approved by the controller, with a rollback plan.
7. A report from the app vendor on its controls over processing integrity and security (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 2017).
These follow the framework's principle that technology used in controls needs general controls of its own (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, 2013).
How Success Will Be Measured
The controller will report three figures to the owners each month from April: tickets printed but not marked delivered after 48 hours, which should fall to zero; dead-plant credits with photographic evidence, which should reach 100 percent; and the share of chain deliveries matched to scans by store, which should exceed 95 percent by June. If any measure misses its target for two months running, the team will review the app's configuration and the drivers' training before the next season.
Timeline
Order tablets by February 1; build and test the integration in February; train drivers in early March; go live March 15, before the first spring loads. Running the old paper tickets in parallel for the first two weeks lets the billing clerk confirm that every delivery reaches the system before the paper process is retired.
Risks of the Recommendation
Drivers may resist an extra step at each stop, and the integration may slip. Training and a simple app screen address the first; the contingency line and a paper fallback with numbered forms address the second (Romney & Steinbart, 2018).
References
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2017). 2017 trust services criteria for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. AICPA.
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2013). Internal control: Integrated framework. https://www.coso.org
Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2018). Accounting information systems (14th ed.). Pearson.
The Purdue Global AC314 Unit 10 instructions
The final AC314 unit asks for a recommendation report on a system change for a named reader. Head the report To, From, Date and Subject, then give the owners the recommendation, its cost and its payback in the first paragraph. State the problem from earlier findings with figures. Compare at least three alternatives on cost and on which weaknesses each fixes, itemizing costs so each can be traced. Recommend one and explain why it beats the others. Count benefits conservatively and say what is left out. Name the controls the new system itself needs, including access, data integrity, offline capture, exception reporting, change management and vendor assurance. Add measures of success, a timeline and the recommendation's own risks. Write for owners, not technicians. Cite the textbook, COSO and the trust services criteria in APA 7.
How this AC314 Unit 10 example is built
The sample's header addresses the owners, and the summary gives $70,680 of first-year cost, $15,880 recurring and a payback of about nine months. The problem section restates $41,300 of unbilled tickets, $130,000 of excess credits and $450,000 of unexplained chain shrink. Three alternatives follow, with the tablet option itemized line by line from tablets to contingency. The highlighted sentence explains why the tablet option wins. A benefits paragraph counts $93,300 a year and leaves chain recovery out. Seven controls follow, from remote wipe and role-based access to an offline mode with sync counts and a vendor controls report under the 2017 trust services criteria, tied to COSO's principle on technology controls. Sections on success measures, the March 15 go-live with parallel paper tickets, and risks close the report.
Reading the AC314 Unit 10 grading rubric
The AC314 grader asks first whether the choice of system grows out of the findings already on record. The problem must come from earlier findings with figures. At least three alternatives should be compared on the same terms. Itemized costs, traceable to quotes or assumptions, earn credit; a single total does not. Benefits must be realistic, with excluded benefits named. The controls the new system needs are a distinct scoring area, and reports that recommend technology without controls lose points. Success measures, a timeline and the recommendation's own risks show professional judgment. Writing for owners rather than technicians is assessed. The payback calculation must be correct. Purdue Global's AC314 instructors expect the textbook, COSO and the trust services criteria cited in APA 7.
AC314 Unit 10 help from the desk
Systems recommendation reports often pick the most advanced option without comparing alternatives. Costs appear as one number with no breakdown. Benefits are inflated, counting one-time cash as yearly savings. The problem is described in general terms rather than from the earlier findings. Controls over the new system are left out, as if technology removed risk. Reports skip implementation timing, measures of success and the risks of the recommendation itself. Technical detail crowds out the decision the owners must make. If your case asks you to recommend accounting software, a cloud migration or a new point-of-sale system, a writer can cost the alternatives and prepare the report from your facts.
Get an AC314 Unit 10 example written to your instructions
Share your organization's case from the Unit 10 prompt, whatever costs or vendor figures it provides, and the rubric. The report comes back within 24-48h with alternatives costed, a recommendation made and the new system's own controls addressed. A first custom sample costs nothing and follows your instructions exactly. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More AC314 papers and BS in Accounting samples
- AC314 Unit 1: What an AIS Owes Its Users Post
- AC314 Unit 2: Order-to-Invoice System Flowchart
- AC314 Unit 3: Data Flow Diagram Set
- AC314 Unit 4: Revenue Cycle Analysis
- AC314 Unit 5: Expenditure Cycle Analysis
- AC314 Unit 6: Internal Control Matrix
- AC314 Unit 7: Fraud Triangle Scenario Analysis
- AC314 Unit 8: Enterprise Risk Register
- AC314 Unit 9: System Outage Seminar Reflection
- AC312 Unit 10: Analytics Summary Report
- AC302 Unit 10: Financial Statement Disclosure Notes
- AC301 Unit 10: Earnings Per Share Problem
- AC300 Unit 10: Five-Step Revenue Analysis
AC314 Unit 10 questions, answered
How precise do the costs need to be?
Precise enough that each line can be traced to a source, such as a vendor quote, a published price or a stated assumption. The AC314 sample itemizes tablets, subscriptions, integration and training rather than giving one total, and labels which figures are quotes and which are estimates. Graders tend to accept reasonable assumptions when they are stated and to mark down round totals with no build.
What if my prompt asks me to recommend new accounting software?
Then the report compares the packages your case allows on the same basis: cost, the weaknesses each closes, fit with the organization's size and disruption during implementation. Send the case, any vendor information supplied and the rubric. The recommendation and its costs are built on your organization, and the report still addresses the controls the new software will require.
Where can I find a free AC314 Unit 10 sample paper?
This page gives a complete AC314 Unit 10 systems recommendation report for a composite wholesale nursery, with three costed alternatives, a payback, controls for the new system and APA 7 references.
How is the nine-month payback worked out in AC314 Unit 10?
Counted benefits are $41,300 of tickets no longer missed and $52,000 of avoided credits, $93,300 a year. Dividing the $70,680 first-year cost by that figure gives about nine months.
What controls does the AC314 Unit 10 report require of the new system?
Seven, including remote wipe for lost tablets, drivers who cannot edit prices, delivery records that cannot be changed, an offline mode with sync counts and a daily report of tickets not marked delivered.